Methods for Optimizing Evidence Syntheses of Complex Interventions: Case Study of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diabetes Quality Improvement Trials
Healthcare decision-makers need high quality evidence to inform policy and practice decisions. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including meta- analyses of study effects, are considered one of the highest forms of evidence to inform such decisions. Most applications of syst...
Main Author: | Danko, Kristin Julianna |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Grimshaw, Jeremy |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10393/38225 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-22479 |
Similar Items
-
Synthesizing a proper meta-analysis: Are we almost there?
by: Mahmoud A. Abdel-Aleem, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01) -
A comparison of meta-analytic methods for synthesizing evidence from explanatory and pragmatic trials
by: Tolulope T. Sajobi, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in evidence-based clinical practice
by: Erin R McNamara, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
Effectiveness of interventions to improve rates of intravenous thrombolysis using behaviour change wheel functions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Md Golam Hasnain, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey
by: Reint Meursinge Reynders, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)