Mobilizing Victimhood: Blaming and Claiming the Victim in Conservative Discourse in Canada

When it comes to the politics of victimhood, existing academic accounts contend that conservative politics and ideology have largely been defined by a backlash against discourses of victimization. In this respect, North American conservatism is seen as embodying an anti-victimist approach – one wher...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gordon, Kelly
Other Authors: Saurette, Paul
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10393/37800
http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-22062
id ndltd-uottawa.ca-oai-ruor.uottawa.ca-10393-37800
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-uottawa.ca-oai-ruor.uottawa.ca-10393-378002018-06-24T05:51:24Z Mobilizing Victimhood: Blaming and Claiming the Victim in Conservative Discourse in Canada Gordon, Kelly Saurette, Paul conservative politics and ideology Canadian politics politics of victimhood gender and politics critical discourse analysis abortion politics men's rights activism Conservative Party of Canada When it comes to the politics of victimhood, existing academic accounts contend that conservative politics and ideology have largely been defined by a backlash against discourses of victimization. In this respect, North American conservatism is seen as embodying an anti-victimist approach – one where progressive claims of victimhood are represented as the result of an impaired character rather than as the result of systemic cultural and legal discrimination. However, while this literature accurately captures many characteristics of conservative ideology, it risks overlooking the ways that conservative proactively engage with the politics of victimhood and victim arguments. This dissertation offers an examination of the discursive significance of the “victim” in contemporary conservative politics and ideology through an analysis of three realms of conservative politics in Canada: (1) the men’s rights movement, (2) the anti-abortion movement, and (3) the Conservative Party of Canada. Drawing on the results of a large-scale critical discourse analysis and the participant observation of over a dozen conservative events in Canada, this dissertation contends that the debate over the politics of victimhood is not a battle between anti-victim conservative and pro-victim progressives. Rather, contemporary Canadian conservatives are increasingly makers of victim politics – rather than its critics – challenging many academic assumptions made about both conservative ideology and discourse in Canada, as well as the larger politics of victimhood in North America. 2018-06-22T20:32:12Z 2018-06-22T20:32:12Z 2018-06-22 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10393/37800 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-22062 en application/pdf Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic conservative politics and ideology
Canadian politics
politics of victimhood
gender and politics
critical discourse analysis
abortion politics
men's rights activism
Conservative Party of Canada
spellingShingle conservative politics and ideology
Canadian politics
politics of victimhood
gender and politics
critical discourse analysis
abortion politics
men's rights activism
Conservative Party of Canada
Gordon, Kelly
Mobilizing Victimhood: Blaming and Claiming the Victim in Conservative Discourse in Canada
description When it comes to the politics of victimhood, existing academic accounts contend that conservative politics and ideology have largely been defined by a backlash against discourses of victimization. In this respect, North American conservatism is seen as embodying an anti-victimist approach – one where progressive claims of victimhood are represented as the result of an impaired character rather than as the result of systemic cultural and legal discrimination. However, while this literature accurately captures many characteristics of conservative ideology, it risks overlooking the ways that conservative proactively engage with the politics of victimhood and victim arguments. This dissertation offers an examination of the discursive significance of the “victim” in contemporary conservative politics and ideology through an analysis of three realms of conservative politics in Canada: (1) the men’s rights movement, (2) the anti-abortion movement, and (3) the Conservative Party of Canada. Drawing on the results of a large-scale critical discourse analysis and the participant observation of over a dozen conservative events in Canada, this dissertation contends that the debate over the politics of victimhood is not a battle between anti-victim conservative and pro-victim progressives. Rather, contemporary Canadian conservatives are increasingly makers of victim politics – rather than its critics – challenging many academic assumptions made about both conservative ideology and discourse in Canada, as well as the larger politics of victimhood in North America.
author2 Saurette, Paul
author_facet Saurette, Paul
Gordon, Kelly
author Gordon, Kelly
author_sort Gordon, Kelly
title Mobilizing Victimhood: Blaming and Claiming the Victim in Conservative Discourse in Canada
title_short Mobilizing Victimhood: Blaming and Claiming the Victim in Conservative Discourse in Canada
title_full Mobilizing Victimhood: Blaming and Claiming the Victim in Conservative Discourse in Canada
title_fullStr Mobilizing Victimhood: Blaming and Claiming the Victim in Conservative Discourse in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Mobilizing Victimhood: Blaming and Claiming the Victim in Conservative Discourse in Canada
title_sort mobilizing victimhood: blaming and claiming the victim in conservative discourse in canada
publisher Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10393/37800
http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-22062
work_keys_str_mv AT gordonkelly mobilizingvictimhoodblamingandclaimingthevictiminconservativediscourseincanada
_version_ 1718703681692499968