Deconstructing Rapid Reviews: An Exploration of Knowledge, Traits and Attitudes

Deconstructing Rapid Reviews: An Exploration of Knowledge, Traits and Attitudes

‘Rapid review’ is an accelerated evidence synthesis approach that has emerged to meet the needs of knowledge users in healthcare settings who require timely input to support evidence-informed policy and practice questions. Although use of rapid reviews continues to expand, there is a paucity of rese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Kelly, Shannon E.
Other Authors:	Clifford, Tammy J.
Language:	en
Published:	Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa 2015
Subjects:	rapid review evidence synthesis time factors decision-making research methodology
Online Access:	http://hdl.handle.net/10393/33021 http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-4100

Similar Items

Combining abbreviated literature searches with single-reviewer screening: three case studies of rapid reviews
by: Lisa Affengruber, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Expediting evidence synthesis for healthcare decision-making: exploring attitudes and perceptions towards rapid reviews using Q methodology
by: Shannon E. Kelly, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01)

Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study
by: Chantelle Garritty, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Deconstructing knowledge brokering for commissioned rapid reviews: an observational study
by: G. Moore, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses
by: Chantelle Garritty, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01)

Choose your shortcuts wisely: COVID-19 rapid reviews of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine
by: Jennifer Hunter, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Beyond the Law: A Review of Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions in ADA Employment Research
by: Robert Gould, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01)

Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey
by: Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application
by: Micah D. J. Peters, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic
by: Linda Biesty, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools
by: Christian Kohl, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)

Discrete choice experiment to determine preferences of decision-makers in healthcare for different formats of rapid reviews
by: Christian Speckemeier, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations
by: Heather Munthe-Kaas, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings–paper 7: understanding the potential impacts of dissemination bias
by: Andrew Booth, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data
by: Claire Glenton, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series
by: Simon Lewin, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings–paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data
by: Jane Noyes, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
by: Christopher J. Colvin, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table
by: Simon Lewin, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Do policy-makers find commissioned rapid reviews useful?
by: Gabriel Moore, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)

Trading certainty for speed - how much uncertainty are decisionmakers and guideline developers willing to accept when using rapid reviews: an international survey
by: Gernot Wagner, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01)

Health Planning for Indigenous Populations: A Rapid Evidence Review
by: David Loutfi, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

What are the mechanisms that support healthcare professionals to adopt assisted decision-making practice? A rapid realist review
by: Carmel Davies, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Facilitating evidence uptake: development and user testing of a systematic review summary format to inform public health decision-making in German-speaking countries
by: Laura K. Busert, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01)

Das Cochrane COVID-19 Studienregister – eine studienbasierte, strukturierte Datenbank zur effizienten Identifizierung wissenschaftlicher Evidenz
by: Metzendorf, Maria-Inti
Published: (2021-09-01)

In pursuit of certainty: can the systematic review process deliver?
by: Saltman Deborah, et al.
Published: (2013-02-01)

What Synthesis Methodology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Approaches to Research Synthesis.
by: Kara Schick-Makaroff, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01)

A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools
by: Tatiana Person, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Every ROSE has its thorns
by: Melissa K. Sharp, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Rapid review of five years of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research in Australia – persisting under‐representation of urban populations
by: Warren Jennings, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Identifying evidence informed psychological interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Rapid review of the literature
by: Suzanne Fredericks, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Integrative review: what is it? How to do it?
by: Marcela Tavares de Souza, et al.

Integrative review: what is it? How to do it?
by: Marcela Tavares de Souza, et al.
Published: (2010-03-01)

Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise
by: William T Riley, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)

Evidence maps and evidence gaps: evidence review mapping as a method for collating and appraising evidence reviews to inform research and policy
by: Bethan C. O’Leary, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01)

Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation
by: Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

Palliative Care Evidence Review Service (PaCERS): a knowledge transfer partnership
by: Mala Mann, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012–2016: protocol for a systematic review
by: Dawid Pieper, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)

What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary
by: Michelle Pollock, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)

Updating Systematic Reviews: The Policies and Practices of Health Care Organizations Involved in Evidence Synthesis
by: Garritty, Chantelle
Published: (2009)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_s5jck4a34b9cei63t2rl2ae6t3