A Cinematographic Comparison of Two Long-Hang Kip Techniques on the Horizontal Bar

This study used cinematography to determine differences in velocity, acceleration, moments of force, and body centers of gravity in four different positions of two techniques of the long-hang kip. Three female gymnasts performed five attempts of each technique: the traditional method, with an arch i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cox, Pamela S.
Other Authors: Patton, Robert W.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: North Texas State University 1978
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc504509/
Description
Summary:This study used cinematography to determine differences in velocity, acceleration, moments of force, and body centers of gravity in four different positions of two techniques of the long-hang kip. Three female gymnasts performed five attempts of each technique: the traditional method, with an arch in the lower back at the end of the forward swing, and approximate shoulder angle of 180 degrees or more; and the newer method, with no arch in the lower back and approximate shoulder angle of 90 degrees or less. Three. USGF-rated judges scored the kips, and due to inability to distinguish between the two techniques, two subjects were eliminated. Major differences occurred in the swing extension, with the newer technique producing more velocity and a higher center of gravity throughout the movement.