A Comparison of Sight Word and Phonics Contingencies in the Remediation of Oral Reading and Comprehension

A comparison of contingent word and phonics drilling exercises on oral reading errors was made and the effects of a work skipping contingency on reading comprehension were examined. Five learning disabled elementary school children served as subjects. Reading comprehension increased from 30 to 50% o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Huffine, John Harold
Other Authors: Martin, Sander, 1939-
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: North Texas State University 1983
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc504350/
Description
Summary:A comparison of contingent word and phonics drilling exercises on oral reading errors was made and the effects of a work skipping contingency on reading comprehension were examined. Five learning disabled elementary school children served as subjects. Reading comprehension increased from 30 to 50% over baseline, while subjects progressed an average of two years through a reading series. Subjects responded differentially to the two drills on oral reading errors, but the combined effects of the drills produced a 50% average reduction in errors. Pre- and post-tests of reading achievement showed increases in reading grade levels ranging from .8 to 1.5 years during the 10 week, 30 session study. Results supported the efficacy of a behavioral approach to reading remediation.