Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders
Risk assessments for offenders often combine past records with current clinical findings from observations, interviews, and test data. Conclusions based on these risk assessments are highly consequential, sometimes resulting in increased criminal sentences or prolonged hospitalization. Offenders are...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of North Texas
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc500221/ |
id |
ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc500221 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc5002212020-07-15T07:09:31Z Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders Gillard, Nathan D. Risk assessment psychopathy deception impression management Risk assessments for offenders often combine past records with current clinical findings from observations, interviews, and test data. Conclusions based on these risk assessments are highly consequential, sometimes resulting in increased criminal sentences or prolonged hospitalization. Offenders are therefore motivated to intentionally minimize their risk scores. Intentional minimization is especially likely to occur in offenders with high psychopathic traits because goal-directed deception is reflected in many of the core traits of the disorder, such as manipulativeness, glibness, and superficial charm. However, this connection appears to be based on the conceptual understanding of psychopathy, and it has rarely been examined empirically for either frequency or success. The current study examined the connection between psychopathic traits and the intentional minimization of risk factors using a sentenced jail sample. In general, offenders were able to effectively minimize risk on the HCR-20 and SAQ, while the PICTS, as a measure of cognitive styles, was more resistant to such minimization. Psychopathic traits, especially high interpersonal facet scores, led to greater minimization using a repeated measure, simulation design. Important differences in the willingness and ability to use deception were found based on (a) the content of subscales, and (b) the mode of administration (i.e., interview vs. self-report). The important implications of this research are discussed for risk assessment procedures regarding likely areas of deception and its detection. It also informs the growing literature on the connection between psychopathic traits and deception. University of North Texas Rogers, Richard, 1950- Boals, Adriel, 1973- Callahan, Jennifer 2013-08 Thesis or Dissertation Text https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc500221/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc500221 English Public Gillard, Nathan D. Copyright Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights Reserved. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Risk assessment psychopathy deception impression management |
spellingShingle |
Risk assessment psychopathy deception impression management Gillard, Nathan D. Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders |
description |
Risk assessments for offenders often combine past records with current clinical findings from observations, interviews, and test data. Conclusions based on these risk assessments are highly consequential, sometimes resulting in increased criminal sentences or prolonged hospitalization. Offenders are therefore motivated to intentionally minimize their risk scores. Intentional minimization is especially likely to occur in offenders with high psychopathic traits because goal-directed deception is reflected in many of the core traits of the disorder, such as manipulativeness, glibness, and superficial charm. However, this connection appears to be based on the conceptual understanding of psychopathy, and it has rarely been examined empirically for either frequency or success. The current study examined the connection between psychopathic traits and the intentional minimization of risk factors using a sentenced jail sample. In general, offenders were able to effectively minimize risk on the HCR-20 and SAQ, while the PICTS, as a measure of cognitive styles, was more resistant to such minimization. Psychopathic traits, especially high interpersonal facet scores, led to greater minimization using a repeated measure, simulation design. Important differences in the willingness and ability to use deception were found based on (a) the content of subscales, and (b) the mode of administration (i.e., interview vs. self-report). The important implications of this research are discussed for risk assessment procedures regarding likely areas of deception and its detection. It also informs the growing literature on the connection between psychopathic traits and deception. |
author2 |
Rogers, Richard, 1950- |
author_facet |
Rogers, Richard, 1950- Gillard, Nathan D. |
author |
Gillard, Nathan D. |
author_sort |
Gillard, Nathan D. |
title |
Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders |
title_short |
Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders |
title_full |
Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders |
title_fullStr |
Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders |
title_full_unstemmed |
Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders |
title_sort |
denial of risk: the effects of intentional minimization on risk assessments for psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders |
publisher |
University of North Texas |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc500221/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gillardnathand denialofrisktheeffectsofintentionalminimizationonriskassessmentsforpsychopathicandnonpsychopathicoffenders |
_version_ |
1719328811652218880 |