Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders

Risk assessments for offenders often combine past records with current clinical findings from observations, interviews, and test data. Conclusions based on these risk assessments are highly consequential, sometimes resulting in increased criminal sentences or prolonged hospitalization. Offenders are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gillard, Nathan D.
Other Authors: Rogers, Richard, 1950-
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: University of North Texas 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc500221/
id ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc500221
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc5002212020-07-15T07:09:31Z Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders Gillard, Nathan D. Risk assessment psychopathy deception impression management Risk assessments for offenders often combine past records with current clinical findings from observations, interviews, and test data. Conclusions based on these risk assessments are highly consequential, sometimes resulting in increased criminal sentences or prolonged hospitalization. Offenders are therefore motivated to intentionally minimize their risk scores. Intentional minimization is especially likely to occur in offenders with high psychopathic traits because goal-directed deception is reflected in many of the core traits of the disorder, such as manipulativeness, glibness, and superficial charm. However, this connection appears to be based on the conceptual understanding of psychopathy, and it has rarely been examined empirically for either frequency or success. The current study examined the connection between psychopathic traits and the intentional minimization of risk factors using a sentenced jail sample. In general, offenders were able to effectively minimize risk on the HCR-20 and SAQ, while the PICTS, as a measure of cognitive styles, was more resistant to such minimization. Psychopathic traits, especially high interpersonal facet scores, led to greater minimization using a repeated measure, simulation design. Important differences in the willingness and ability to use deception were found based on (a) the content of subscales, and (b) the mode of administration (i.e., interview vs. self-report). The important implications of this research are discussed for risk assessment procedures regarding likely areas of deception and its detection. It also informs the growing literature on the connection between psychopathic traits and deception. University of North Texas Rogers, Richard, 1950- Boals, Adriel, 1973- Callahan, Jennifer 2013-08 Thesis or Dissertation Text https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc500221/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc500221 English Public Gillard, Nathan D. Copyright Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights Reserved.
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Risk assessment
psychopathy
deception
impression management
spellingShingle Risk assessment
psychopathy
deception
impression management
Gillard, Nathan D.
Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders
description Risk assessments for offenders often combine past records with current clinical findings from observations, interviews, and test data. Conclusions based on these risk assessments are highly consequential, sometimes resulting in increased criminal sentences or prolonged hospitalization. Offenders are therefore motivated to intentionally minimize their risk scores. Intentional minimization is especially likely to occur in offenders with high psychopathic traits because goal-directed deception is reflected in many of the core traits of the disorder, such as manipulativeness, glibness, and superficial charm. However, this connection appears to be based on the conceptual understanding of psychopathy, and it has rarely been examined empirically for either frequency or success. The current study examined the connection between psychopathic traits and the intentional minimization of risk factors using a sentenced jail sample. In general, offenders were able to effectively minimize risk on the HCR-20 and SAQ, while the PICTS, as a measure of cognitive styles, was more resistant to such minimization. Psychopathic traits, especially high interpersonal facet scores, led to greater minimization using a repeated measure, simulation design. Important differences in the willingness and ability to use deception were found based on (a) the content of subscales, and (b) the mode of administration (i.e., interview vs. self-report). The important implications of this research are discussed for risk assessment procedures regarding likely areas of deception and its detection. It also informs the growing literature on the connection between psychopathic traits and deception.
author2 Rogers, Richard, 1950-
author_facet Rogers, Richard, 1950-
Gillard, Nathan D.
author Gillard, Nathan D.
author_sort Gillard, Nathan D.
title Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders
title_short Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders
title_full Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders
title_fullStr Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders
title_full_unstemmed Denial of Risk: the Effects of Intentional Minimization on Risk Assessments for Psychopathic and Nonpsychopathic Offenders
title_sort denial of risk: the effects of intentional minimization on risk assessments for psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders
publisher University of North Texas
publishDate 2013
url https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc500221/
work_keys_str_mv AT gillardnathand denialofrisktheeffectsofintentionalminimizationonriskassessmentsforpsychopathicandnonpsychopathicoffenders
_version_ 1719328811652218880