Effortless Control Processing: A Heuristic Strategy for Reducing Cognitive Bias in Judgments of Control

The present investigation tested the prediction that effortless control processing, the deliberate activation of innate automatic encoding mechanisms, will enable nondepressed persons to accurately judge degree of control. Subjective judgment of control in nondepressed students was examined by a mod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Evans, Harry Monroe
Other Authors: Wenrich, W. W., 1932-
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: North Texas State University 1984
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc331210/
id ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc331210
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc3312102018-01-18T05:37:07Z Effortless Control Processing: A Heuristic Strategy for Reducing Cognitive Bias in Judgments of Control Evans, Harry Monroe subjective judgment objective contingencies cognitive bias control processing Control (Psychology) The present investigation tested the prediction that effortless control processing, the deliberate activation of innate automatic encoding mechanisms, will enable nondepressed persons to accurately judge degree of control. Subjective judgment of control in nondepressed students was examined by a modification of the method developed by Jenkins and Ward (1965). The modification was based on Hasher and Zacks' (1979) version of the method. Several measures were used to assess students' representations of control. Students were asked to judge the degree of control their responses had over outcomes rather than the degree of contingency between responses and outcomes. To facilitate comparison of prior studies on the judgment of contingency with the present study, Jenkins and Ward's (1965) index of the actual degree of control was used. Their index used the magnitude of the difference between the conditional probability of an outcome given the occurrence of one response versus the conditional probability of the outcome given the occurrence of another response as representing degree of control or contingency. In this experiment, students instructed in effortful control processing and effortless control processing were presented with a series of problems in which there was no contingency between their responses and outcomes. The problems differed in the degree of favorable outcome frequency. Students' abilities to detect noncontingency between responses and outcomes under different conditions of outcome frequency was examined. North Texas State University Wenrich, W. W., 1932- Peek, Leon A. Sininger, Rollin Albert Lawlis, G. Frank 1984-12 Thesis or Dissertation v, 46 leaves: ill. Text local-cont-no: 1002779532-Evans call-no: 379 N81d no. 2270 untcat: b1870824 oclc: 12308184 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc331210/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc331210 English Public Evans, Harry Monroe Copyright Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic subjective judgment
objective contingencies
cognitive bias
control processing
Control (Psychology)
spellingShingle subjective judgment
objective contingencies
cognitive bias
control processing
Control (Psychology)
Evans, Harry Monroe
Effortless Control Processing: A Heuristic Strategy for Reducing Cognitive Bias in Judgments of Control
description The present investigation tested the prediction that effortless control processing, the deliberate activation of innate automatic encoding mechanisms, will enable nondepressed persons to accurately judge degree of control. Subjective judgment of control in nondepressed students was examined by a modification of the method developed by Jenkins and Ward (1965). The modification was based on Hasher and Zacks' (1979) version of the method. Several measures were used to assess students' representations of control. Students were asked to judge the degree of control their responses had over outcomes rather than the degree of contingency between responses and outcomes. To facilitate comparison of prior studies on the judgment of contingency with the present study, Jenkins and Ward's (1965) index of the actual degree of control was used. Their index used the magnitude of the difference between the conditional probability of an outcome given the occurrence of one response versus the conditional probability of the outcome given the occurrence of another response as representing degree of control or contingency. In this experiment, students instructed in effortful control processing and effortless control processing were presented with a series of problems in which there was no contingency between their responses and outcomes. The problems differed in the degree of favorable outcome frequency. Students' abilities to detect noncontingency between responses and outcomes under different conditions of outcome frequency was examined.
author2 Wenrich, W. W., 1932-
author_facet Wenrich, W. W., 1932-
Evans, Harry Monroe
author Evans, Harry Monroe
author_sort Evans, Harry Monroe
title Effortless Control Processing: A Heuristic Strategy for Reducing Cognitive Bias in Judgments of Control
title_short Effortless Control Processing: A Heuristic Strategy for Reducing Cognitive Bias in Judgments of Control
title_full Effortless Control Processing: A Heuristic Strategy for Reducing Cognitive Bias in Judgments of Control
title_fullStr Effortless Control Processing: A Heuristic Strategy for Reducing Cognitive Bias in Judgments of Control
title_full_unstemmed Effortless Control Processing: A Heuristic Strategy for Reducing Cognitive Bias in Judgments of Control
title_sort effortless control processing: a heuristic strategy for reducing cognitive bias in judgments of control
publisher North Texas State University
publishDate 1984
url https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc331210/
work_keys_str_mv AT evansharrymonroe effortlesscontrolprocessingaheuristicstrategyforreducingcognitivebiasinjudgmentsofcontrol
_version_ 1718611579074772992