Effect of Task Appropriateness, Social Comparison, and Feedback on Female Goals, Performance, and Self-Confidence with a Motor Task

Lenney (1977) concluded that achievement gender differences were predicted by females' lower self confidence and expectancies in competitive situations, identifying three variables that mediated female self confidence in achievement situations, (1) task appropriateness. (2) social comparison,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adler, William P.
Other Authors: Weinberg, Robert S. (Robert Stephen)
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: University of North Texas 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc330697/
id ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc330697
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc3306972017-03-17T08:41:07Z Effect of Task Appropriateness, Social Comparison, and Feedback on Female Goals, Performance, and Self-Confidence with a Motor Task Adler, William P. task appropriateness Women|xPsychology. Perceptual-motor learning. Goal (Psychology) Performance. Self-confidence. gender achievement differences self-confidence Lenney (1977) concluded that achievement gender differences were predicted by females' lower self confidence and expectancies in competitive situations, identifying three variables that mediated female self confidence in achievement situations, (1) task appropriateness. (2) social comparison, and (3) feedback. The present study manipulated all three mediating variables with 240 undergraduate 18-25 year old female subjects with the pursuit rotor task that requires tracking a moving (40 rpm's) white light with a hand-held stylus for 60 seconds. Response measurement was based upon time on target. Subjects were tested over five trials while setting goals for each trial. Females were randomly assigned to a male appropriate, female appropriate, or gender neutral task condition, a competition or alone condition, and to one of four feedback conditions (no feedback, feedback about own performance only, feedback about own performance that provided the perception that subject was performing better than an opponent and/or average on each trial, or feedback about own performance that provided the perception that subject was performing poorer than an opponent and/or average on each of the five trials). Results from the 2 (social comparison) X 3 (task appropriateness) X 4 (feedback) ANOVA were contradictory to previous findings (Corbin, 1981; Petruzzello & Corbin, 1988) as females performed significantly better in competition than alone. Data support the conclusion that presentation of clear and unambiguous feedback enhanced female self-confidence (Corbin, 1981; Petruzzello & Corbin, 1988; Lenney, 1977). Data also provide null findings for the task appropriateness condition which contradicts the previous research (Corbin, 1981; Lenney, 1977) in that females perceiving the task as male appropriate did not exhibit less self-confidence and perform poorer than when the task was perceived as either female appropriate or gender neutral. Conclusions reflect methodological differences from previous research and changes in gender role identification that have significantly impacted on female self-confidence and performance in competitive situations. University of North Texas Weinberg, Robert S. (Robert Stephen) Richardson, Peggy A., 1938- Kennelly, Kevin J. Harrell, Ernest H. Bodenhamer-Davis, Eugenia 1990-05 Thesis or Dissertation v, 127 leaves Text local-cont-no: 1002719168-Adler call-no: 379 N81d no.3145 untcat: b1453147 oclc: 23136893 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc330697/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc330697 English Public Adler, William P. Copyright Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic task appropriateness
Women|xPsychology.
Perceptual-motor learning.
Goal (Psychology)
Performance.
Self-confidence.
gender achievement differences
self-confidence
spellingShingle task appropriateness
Women|xPsychology.
Perceptual-motor learning.
Goal (Psychology)
Performance.
Self-confidence.
gender achievement differences
self-confidence
Adler, William P.
Effect of Task Appropriateness, Social Comparison, and Feedback on Female Goals, Performance, and Self-Confidence with a Motor Task
description Lenney (1977) concluded that achievement gender differences were predicted by females' lower self confidence and expectancies in competitive situations, identifying three variables that mediated female self confidence in achievement situations, (1) task appropriateness. (2) social comparison, and (3) feedback. The present study manipulated all three mediating variables with 240 undergraduate 18-25 year old female subjects with the pursuit rotor task that requires tracking a moving (40 rpm's) white light with a hand-held stylus for 60 seconds. Response measurement was based upon time on target. Subjects were tested over five trials while setting goals for each trial. Females were randomly assigned to a male appropriate, female appropriate, or gender neutral task condition, a competition or alone condition, and to one of four feedback conditions (no feedback, feedback about own performance only, feedback about own performance that provided the perception that subject was performing better than an opponent and/or average on each trial, or feedback about own performance that provided the perception that subject was performing poorer than an opponent and/or average on each of the five trials). Results from the 2 (social comparison) X 3 (task appropriateness) X 4 (feedback) ANOVA were contradictory to previous findings (Corbin, 1981; Petruzzello & Corbin, 1988) as females performed significantly better in competition than alone. Data support the conclusion that presentation of clear and unambiguous feedback enhanced female self-confidence (Corbin, 1981; Petruzzello & Corbin, 1988; Lenney, 1977). Data also provide null findings for the task appropriateness condition which contradicts the previous research (Corbin, 1981; Lenney, 1977) in that females perceiving the task as male appropriate did not exhibit less self-confidence and perform poorer than when the task was perceived as either female appropriate or gender neutral. Conclusions reflect methodological differences from previous research and changes in gender role identification that have significantly impacted on female self-confidence and performance in competitive situations.
author2 Weinberg, Robert S. (Robert Stephen)
author_facet Weinberg, Robert S. (Robert Stephen)
Adler, William P.
author Adler, William P.
author_sort Adler, William P.
title Effect of Task Appropriateness, Social Comparison, and Feedback on Female Goals, Performance, and Self-Confidence with a Motor Task
title_short Effect of Task Appropriateness, Social Comparison, and Feedback on Female Goals, Performance, and Self-Confidence with a Motor Task
title_full Effect of Task Appropriateness, Social Comparison, and Feedback on Female Goals, Performance, and Self-Confidence with a Motor Task
title_fullStr Effect of Task Appropriateness, Social Comparison, and Feedback on Female Goals, Performance, and Self-Confidence with a Motor Task
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Task Appropriateness, Social Comparison, and Feedback on Female Goals, Performance, and Self-Confidence with a Motor Task
title_sort effect of task appropriateness, social comparison, and feedback on female goals, performance, and self-confidence with a motor task
publisher University of North Texas
publishDate 1990
url https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc330697/
work_keys_str_mv AT adlerwilliamp effectoftaskappropriatenesssocialcomparisonandfeedbackonfemalegoalsperformanceandselfconfidencewithamotortask
_version_ 1718432044975915008