An Analysis of Interrater Agreement Between the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS), Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), and Analog Assessment Outcomes

An analysis of interrater agreement across multiple respondents on anecdotal assessments was compared with experimental functional analysis outcomes for correspondence. Experiment 1 evaluated the agreement of multiple respondents on the function of problem behavior for 22 individuals across 42 targe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Smith, Carla Michelle
Other Authors: Smith, Richard G. (Richard Gordon), 1956-
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: University of North Texas 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc28477/
id ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc28477
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc284772017-03-18T05:33:04Z An Analysis of Interrater Agreement Between the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS), Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), and Analog Assessment Outcomes Smith, Carla Michelle High school principal turnover high school principal tenure high school principal retention Behavioral assessment. Motivation Assessment Scale. Motivation (Psychology) -- Testing. An analysis of interrater agreement across multiple respondents on anecdotal assessments was compared with experimental functional analysis outcomes for correspondence. Experiment 1 evaluated the agreement of multiple respondents on the function of problem behavior for 22 individuals across 42 target behaviors using the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) and the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF). Results showed agreement on the primary maintaining consequence for 4 or 5 of the 5 respondents in 52% (22/42) of the individual's target behaviors with the MAS and 57% (24/42) with the QABF. Experiment 2 examined whether correspondence occurred between the anecdotal assessment results and experimental functional analysis (EFA) results for 7 individuals selected from Experiment 1. Correspondence between the QABF assessment and the EFA was found for 6 of 7 participants, and 4 of the 7 showed correspondence between the EFA and the MAS. This study showed that the QABF had higher correspondence with analog assessments than the MAS thus, supporting the previous findings of Paclawskyj et al. (2001). University of North Texas Smith, Richard G. (Richard Gordon), 1956- Ala'i-Rosales, Shahla Vaidya, Manish 2010-05 Thesis or Dissertation Text oclc: 664683169 untcat: b3865685 https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc28477/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc28477 English Public Copyright Smith, Carla Michelle Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic High school principal turnover
high school principal tenure
high school principal retention
Behavioral assessment.
Motivation Assessment Scale.
Motivation (Psychology) -- Testing.
spellingShingle High school principal turnover
high school principal tenure
high school principal retention
Behavioral assessment.
Motivation Assessment Scale.
Motivation (Psychology) -- Testing.
Smith, Carla Michelle
An Analysis of Interrater Agreement Between the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS), Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), and Analog Assessment Outcomes
description An analysis of interrater agreement across multiple respondents on anecdotal assessments was compared with experimental functional analysis outcomes for correspondence. Experiment 1 evaluated the agreement of multiple respondents on the function of problem behavior for 22 individuals across 42 target behaviors using the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) and the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF). Results showed agreement on the primary maintaining consequence for 4 or 5 of the 5 respondents in 52% (22/42) of the individual's target behaviors with the MAS and 57% (24/42) with the QABF. Experiment 2 examined whether correspondence occurred between the anecdotal assessment results and experimental functional analysis (EFA) results for 7 individuals selected from Experiment 1. Correspondence between the QABF assessment and the EFA was found for 6 of 7 participants, and 4 of the 7 showed correspondence between the EFA and the MAS. This study showed that the QABF had higher correspondence with analog assessments than the MAS thus, supporting the previous findings of Paclawskyj et al. (2001).
author2 Smith, Richard G. (Richard Gordon), 1956-
author_facet Smith, Richard G. (Richard Gordon), 1956-
Smith, Carla Michelle
author Smith, Carla Michelle
author_sort Smith, Carla Michelle
title An Analysis of Interrater Agreement Between the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS), Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), and Analog Assessment Outcomes
title_short An Analysis of Interrater Agreement Between the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS), Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), and Analog Assessment Outcomes
title_full An Analysis of Interrater Agreement Between the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS), Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), and Analog Assessment Outcomes
title_fullStr An Analysis of Interrater Agreement Between the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS), Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), and Analog Assessment Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Interrater Agreement Between the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS), Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), and Analog Assessment Outcomes
title_sort analysis of interrater agreement between the motivation assessment scale (mas), questions about behavioral function (qabf), and analog assessment outcomes
publisher University of North Texas
publishDate 2010
url https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc28477/
work_keys_str_mv AT smithcarlamichelle ananalysisofinterrateragreementbetweenthemotivationassessmentscalemasquestionsaboutbehavioralfunctionqabfandanalogassessmentoutcomes
AT smithcarlamichelle analysisofinterrateragreementbetweenthemotivationassessmentscalemasquestionsaboutbehavioralfunctionqabfandanalogassessmentoutcomes
_version_ 1718433106588860416