Determination of the Optimal Number of Strata for Bias Reduction in Propensity Score Matching.
Previous research implementing stratification on the propensity score has generally relied on using five strata, based on prior theoretical groundwork and minimal empirical evidence as to the suitability of quintiles to adequately reduce bias in all cases and across all sample sizes. This study inve...
Main Author: | Akers, Allen |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Hull, Darrell M. |
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of North Texas
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc28380/ |
Similar Items
-
Propensity-score matching: a clinician’s guide
by: Andrew D Althouse
Published: (2016-06-01) -
The Use Of Effect Size Estimates To Evaluate Covariate Selection, Group Separation, And Sensitivity To Hidden Bias In Propensity Score Matching.
by: Lane, Forrest C.
Published: (2011) -
AES Impact Evaluation With Integrated Farm Data: Combining Statistical Matching and Propensity Score Matching
by: Riccardo D’Alberto, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Applied comparison of large‐scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research
by: Stephen P. Fortin, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Inference from Non-Probability Surveys with Statistical Matching and Propensity Score Adjustment Using Modern Prediction Techniques
by: Luis Castro-Martín, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)