Specter

This dissertation is a collection of poems preceded by a critical preface. The preface considers the major changes within the elegy from the traditional English elegy—the touchstone poems for this genre being Milton's "Lycidas," Shelley's "Adonais," and Tennyson's...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sharpe, Mary Victoria
Other Authors: Marks, Corey
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: University of North Texas 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc271896/
id ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc271896
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc2718962020-07-15T07:09:31Z Specter Sharpe, Mary Victoria Elegy traditional contemporary This dissertation is a collection of poems preceded by a critical preface. The preface considers the major changes within the elegy from the traditional English elegy—the touchstone poems for this genre being Milton's "Lycidas," Shelley's "Adonais," and Tennyson's "In Memoriam"—to the contemporary elegy and argues that many of these changes showcase contemporary elegists' active refusal and reversal of the time-honored traditions of the form. The preface is divided into an introduction and three sections, each of which recognizes and explores one significant alteration—or reversal—to the conventions of the form as established by early English elegists. The first discusses the traditional elegiac tradition of consolation in which the speaker, after displaying a series of emotions in reaction to the death of a loved one, ultimately finds comfort in the knowledge that the deceased lives eternally in heaven. This convention is contrasted with a common contemporary rhetorical movement in which the speaker not only lacks comfort by the end of the poem, but often refuses any kind of consolation, preferring instead to continue his grief. The second recognizes and explores the traditional elegiac tradition in which the speaker, listing the virtues of the beloved, replaces the real, historical person with a symbol which represents what society has lost due to this death. This convention is contrasted against a common contemporary theme in which the speaker, in an attempt to evoke authenticity, portrays the deceased subject not as a romanticized symbol, but as a real human being. The final section discusses the definition of the traditional elegy as a reaction to the literal death of a loved one and contrasts this with the more fluid contemporary understanding of the elegy as a poem about loss—either a literal or metaphorical death—and a poem which need not display conventional aspects of mourning but rather a wide variety of responses to the problem of loss. University of North Texas Marks, Corey Bond, Bruce Fairchild, B. H. Curran, Kevin 2013-05 Thesis or Dissertation Text https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc271896/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc271896 English Public Sharpe, Mary Victoria Copyright Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights Reserved.
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Elegy
traditional
contemporary
spellingShingle Elegy
traditional
contemporary
Sharpe, Mary Victoria
Specter
description This dissertation is a collection of poems preceded by a critical preface. The preface considers the major changes within the elegy from the traditional English elegy—the touchstone poems for this genre being Milton's "Lycidas," Shelley's "Adonais," and Tennyson's "In Memoriam"—to the contemporary elegy and argues that many of these changes showcase contemporary elegists' active refusal and reversal of the time-honored traditions of the form. The preface is divided into an introduction and three sections, each of which recognizes and explores one significant alteration—or reversal—to the conventions of the form as established by early English elegists. The first discusses the traditional elegiac tradition of consolation in which the speaker, after displaying a series of emotions in reaction to the death of a loved one, ultimately finds comfort in the knowledge that the deceased lives eternally in heaven. This convention is contrasted with a common contemporary rhetorical movement in which the speaker not only lacks comfort by the end of the poem, but often refuses any kind of consolation, preferring instead to continue his grief. The second recognizes and explores the traditional elegiac tradition in which the speaker, listing the virtues of the beloved, replaces the real, historical person with a symbol which represents what society has lost due to this death. This convention is contrasted against a common contemporary theme in which the speaker, in an attempt to evoke authenticity, portrays the deceased subject not as a romanticized symbol, but as a real human being. The final section discusses the definition of the traditional elegy as a reaction to the literal death of a loved one and contrasts this with the more fluid contemporary understanding of the elegy as a poem about loss—either a literal or metaphorical death—and a poem which need not display conventional aspects of mourning but rather a wide variety of responses to the problem of loss.
author2 Marks, Corey
author_facet Marks, Corey
Sharpe, Mary Victoria
author Sharpe, Mary Victoria
author_sort Sharpe, Mary Victoria
title Specter
title_short Specter
title_full Specter
title_fullStr Specter
title_full_unstemmed Specter
title_sort specter
publisher University of North Texas
publishDate 2013
url https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc271896/
work_keys_str_mv AT sharpemaryvictoria specter
_version_ 1719328191171002368