Steady State and Transient Dynamical Systems Analysis of Uncoupled Roll Response for a Traditional Versus Advanced Hull Form

Steady State and Transient Dynamical Systems Analysis of Uncoupled Roll Response for a Traditional Versus Advanced Hull Form

The two ships represented in this thesis are dramatically different in design, but both exhibit similar properties such as length and breadth. The traditional hull form is represented by a typical flare-sided design with a forward reaching bow while the advanced hull form has a modified tumblehom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juckett, Sarah Eileen
Format: Others
Published: ScholarWorks@UNO 2006
Online Access:http://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/407
http://scholarworks.uno.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1428&context=td
id ndltd-uno.edu-oai-scholarworks.uno.edu-td-1428
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-uno.edu-oai-scholarworks.uno.edu-td-14282016-10-21T17:04:11Z Steady State and Transient Dynamical Systems Analysis of Uncoupled Roll Response for a Traditional Versus Advanced Hull Form Juckett, Sarah Eileen The two ships represented in this thesis are dramatically different in design, but both exhibit similar properties such as length and breadth. The traditional hull form is represented by a typical flare-sided design with a forward reaching bow while the advanced hull form has a modified tumblehome and a truncated bow. The difference in shapes provides an interesting problem, comparing the roll responses for these two very different vessels while keeping certain shape parameters such as length, beam, and draft constant. 2006-08-09T07:00:00Z text application/pdf http://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/407 http://scholarworks.uno.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1428&context=td University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations ScholarWorks@UNO
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
description The two ships represented in this thesis are dramatically different in design, but both exhibit similar properties such as length and breadth. The traditional hull form is represented by a typical flare-sided design with a forward reaching bow while the advanced hull form has a modified tumblehome and a truncated bow. The difference in shapes provides an interesting problem, comparing the roll responses for these two very different vessels while keeping certain shape parameters such as length, beam, and draft constant.
author Juckett, Sarah Eileen
spellingShingle Juckett, Sarah Eileen
Steady State and Transient Dynamical Systems Analysis of Uncoupled Roll Response for a Traditional Versus Advanced Hull Form
author_facet Juckett, Sarah Eileen
author_sort Juckett, Sarah Eileen
title Steady State and Transient Dynamical Systems Analysis of Uncoupled Roll Response for a Traditional Versus Advanced Hull Form
title_short Steady State and Transient Dynamical Systems Analysis of Uncoupled Roll Response for a Traditional Versus Advanced Hull Form
title_full Steady State and Transient Dynamical Systems Analysis of Uncoupled Roll Response for a Traditional Versus Advanced Hull Form
title_fullStr Steady State and Transient Dynamical Systems Analysis of Uncoupled Roll Response for a Traditional Versus Advanced Hull Form
title_full_unstemmed Steady State and Transient Dynamical Systems Analysis of Uncoupled Roll Response for a Traditional Versus Advanced Hull Form
title_sort steady state and transient dynamical systems analysis of uncoupled roll response for a traditional versus advanced hull form
publisher ScholarWorks@UNO
publishDate 2006
url http://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/407
http://scholarworks.uno.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1428&context=td
work_keys_str_mv AT juckettsaraheileen steadystateandtransientdynamicalsystemsanalysisofuncoupledrollresponseforatraditionalversusadvancedhullform
_version_ 1718387921389617152

Similar Items