STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY

Large carnivores have been subjected to overexploitation and extensive habitat loss for centuries. Reintroduction has become an increasingly used tool for recovering and reestablishing large carnivore populations; however, most reintroductions have either failed or resulted in small populations that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Murphy, Sean McCarthy
Format: Others
Published: UKnowledge 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://uknowledge.uky.edu/forestry_etds/1
http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=forestry_etds
id ndltd-uky.edu-oai-uknowledge.uky.edu-forestry_etds-1000
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-uky.edu-oai-uknowledge.uky.edu-forestry_etds-10002015-04-11T05:05:48Z STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY Murphy, Sean McCarthy Large carnivores have been subjected to overexploitation and extensive habitat loss for centuries. Reintroduction has become an increasingly used tool for recovering and reestablishing large carnivore populations; however, most reintroductions have either failed or resulted in small populations that are vulnerable to deleterious demographic, environmental, and genetic effects that can lead to population loss or extinction. Longterm monitoring of small, reintroduced populations is critical to population persistence and viability. To evaluate long-term reintroduction success and current status of a recently reintroduced, small black bear (Ursus americanus) population in the Big South Fork area of Kentucky, I used non-invasive hair sampling in a systematic, closedpopulation capture-mark-recapture study design. I used ≥ 20 microsatellite loci to identify individual bear, quantify genetic diversity, investigate genetic relatedness, estimate population abundance and density, and investigate patterns of range expansion. The Big South Fork population is comprised of closely-related individuals, is small (N = 40; 95% CI: 30-113), of low density (0.03 bear/km2), has experienced minimal range expansion, and exhibits decreased genetic diversity (HE = 0.698). Because of prolonged isolation from nearby subpopulations, the Big South Fork population remains vulnerable and requires immediate and continued monitoring. 2011-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf http://uknowledge.uky.edu/forestry_etds/1 http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=forestry_etds Theses and Dissertations--Forestry UKnowledge Bear Big South Fork Kentucky Reintroduction Small Populations Forest Sciences
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Bear
Big South Fork
Kentucky
Reintroduction
Small Populations
Forest Sciences
spellingShingle Bear
Big South Fork
Kentucky
Reintroduction
Small Populations
Forest Sciences
Murphy, Sean McCarthy
STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY
description Large carnivores have been subjected to overexploitation and extensive habitat loss for centuries. Reintroduction has become an increasingly used tool for recovering and reestablishing large carnivore populations; however, most reintroductions have either failed or resulted in small populations that are vulnerable to deleterious demographic, environmental, and genetic effects that can lead to population loss or extinction. Longterm monitoring of small, reintroduced populations is critical to population persistence and viability. To evaluate long-term reintroduction success and current status of a recently reintroduced, small black bear (Ursus americanus) population in the Big South Fork area of Kentucky, I used non-invasive hair sampling in a systematic, closedpopulation capture-mark-recapture study design. I used ≥ 20 microsatellite loci to identify individual bear, quantify genetic diversity, investigate genetic relatedness, estimate population abundance and density, and investigate patterns of range expansion. The Big South Fork population is comprised of closely-related individuals, is small (N = 40; 95% CI: 30-113), of low density (0.03 bear/km2), has experienced minimal range expansion, and exhibits decreased genetic diversity (HE = 0.698). Because of prolonged isolation from nearby subpopulations, the Big South Fork population remains vulnerable and requires immediate and continued monitoring.
author Murphy, Sean McCarthy
author_facet Murphy, Sean McCarthy
author_sort Murphy, Sean McCarthy
title STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY
title_short STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY
title_full STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY
title_fullStr STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY
title_full_unstemmed STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY
title_sort status of a reintroduced black bear population in the big south fork area of kentucky
publisher UKnowledge
publishDate 2011
url http://uknowledge.uky.edu/forestry_etds/1
http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=forestry_etds
work_keys_str_mv AT murphyseanmccarthy statusofareintroducedblackbearpopulationinthebigsouthforkareaofkentucky
_version_ 1716801151623495680