STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY
Large carnivores have been subjected to overexploitation and extensive habitat loss for centuries. Reintroduction has become an increasingly used tool for recovering and reestablishing large carnivore populations; however, most reintroductions have either failed or resulted in small populations that...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
UKnowledge
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://uknowledge.uky.edu/forestry_etds/1 http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=forestry_etds |
id |
ndltd-uky.edu-oai-uknowledge.uky.edu-forestry_etds-1000 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-uky.edu-oai-uknowledge.uky.edu-forestry_etds-10002015-04-11T05:05:48Z STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY Murphy, Sean McCarthy Large carnivores have been subjected to overexploitation and extensive habitat loss for centuries. Reintroduction has become an increasingly used tool for recovering and reestablishing large carnivore populations; however, most reintroductions have either failed or resulted in small populations that are vulnerable to deleterious demographic, environmental, and genetic effects that can lead to population loss or extinction. Longterm monitoring of small, reintroduced populations is critical to population persistence and viability. To evaluate long-term reintroduction success and current status of a recently reintroduced, small black bear (Ursus americanus) population in the Big South Fork area of Kentucky, I used non-invasive hair sampling in a systematic, closedpopulation capture-mark-recapture study design. I used ≥ 20 microsatellite loci to identify individual bear, quantify genetic diversity, investigate genetic relatedness, estimate population abundance and density, and investigate patterns of range expansion. The Big South Fork population is comprised of closely-related individuals, is small (N = 40; 95% CI: 30-113), of low density (0.03 bear/km2), has experienced minimal range expansion, and exhibits decreased genetic diversity (HE = 0.698). Because of prolonged isolation from nearby subpopulations, the Big South Fork population remains vulnerable and requires immediate and continued monitoring. 2011-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf http://uknowledge.uky.edu/forestry_etds/1 http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=forestry_etds Theses and Dissertations--Forestry UKnowledge Bear Big South Fork Kentucky Reintroduction Small Populations Forest Sciences |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Bear Big South Fork Kentucky Reintroduction Small Populations Forest Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Bear Big South Fork Kentucky Reintroduction Small Populations Forest Sciences Murphy, Sean McCarthy STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY |
description |
Large carnivores have been subjected to overexploitation and extensive habitat loss for centuries. Reintroduction has become an increasingly used tool for recovering and reestablishing large carnivore populations; however, most reintroductions have either failed or resulted in small populations that are vulnerable to deleterious demographic, environmental, and genetic effects that can lead to population loss or extinction. Longterm monitoring of small, reintroduced populations is critical to population persistence and viability. To evaluate long-term reintroduction success and current status of a recently reintroduced, small black bear (Ursus americanus) population in the Big South Fork area of Kentucky, I used non-invasive hair sampling in a systematic, closedpopulation capture-mark-recapture study design. I used ≥ 20 microsatellite loci to identify individual bear, quantify genetic diversity, investigate genetic relatedness, estimate population abundance and density, and investigate patterns of range expansion. The Big South Fork population is comprised of closely-related individuals, is small (N = 40; 95% CI: 30-113), of low density (0.03 bear/km2), has experienced minimal range expansion, and exhibits decreased genetic diversity (HE = 0.698). Because of prolonged isolation from nearby subpopulations, the Big South Fork population remains vulnerable and requires immediate and continued monitoring. |
author |
Murphy, Sean McCarthy |
author_facet |
Murphy, Sean McCarthy |
author_sort |
Murphy, Sean McCarthy |
title |
STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY |
title_short |
STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY |
title_full |
STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY |
title_fullStr |
STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY |
title_full_unstemmed |
STATUS OF A REINTRODUCED BLACK BEAR POPULATION IN THE BIG SOUTH FORK AREA OF KENTUCKY |
title_sort |
status of a reintroduced black bear population in the big south fork area of kentucky |
publisher |
UKnowledge |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://uknowledge.uky.edu/forestry_etds/1 http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=forestry_etds |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT murphyseanmccarthy statusofareintroducedblackbearpopulationinthebigsouthforkareaofkentucky |
_version_ |
1716801151623495680 |