A Machine-Learning-Based Pipeline Approach to Automated Fact-Checking

• Main Author: Hanselowski, Andreas
• Format: Others
• Language: en
• Published: 2020
• Online Access: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/14136/1/Thesis%20%2814%29.pdf; Hanselowski, Andreas <http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/view/person/Hanselowski=3AAndreas=3A=3A.html> (2020): A Machine-Learning-Based Pipeline Approach to Automated Fact-Checking. (Publisher's Version)Darmstadt, Technische Universität, DOI: 10.25534/tuprints-00014136 <https://doi.org/10.25534/tuprints-00014136>, [Ph.D. Thesis]

In the past couple of years, there has been a significant increase of the amount of false information on the web. The falsehoods quickly spread through social networks reaching a wider audience than ever before. This poses new challenges to our society as we have to reevaluate which information source we should trust and how we consume and distribute content on the web. As a response to the rising amount of disinformation on the Internet, the number of fact-checking platforms has increased. On these platforms, professional fact-checkers validate the published information and make their conclusions publicly available. Nevertheless, the manual validation of information by fact-checkers is laborious and time-consuming, and as a result, not all of the published content can be validated. Since the conclusions of the validations are released with a delay, the interest in the topic has often already declined, and thus, only a small fraction of the original news consumers can be reached. Automated fact-checking holds the promise to address these drawbacks as it would allow fact-checkers to identify and eliminate false information as it appears on the web and before it reaches a wide audience. However, despite significant progress in the field of automated fact-checking, substantial challenges remain: (i) The datasets available for training machine learning-based fact-checking systems do not provide high-quality annotation of real fact-checking instances for all the tasks in the fact-checking process. (ii) Many of today’s fact-checking systems are based on knowledge bases that have low coverage. Moreover, because for these systems sentences in natural language need to be transformed into formal queries, which is a difficult task, the systems are error-prone. (iii) Current end-to-end trained machine learning systems can process raw text and thus, potentially harness the vast amount of knowledge on the Internet, but they are intransparent and do not reach the desired performance. In fact, fact-checking is a challenging task and today’s machine learning approaches are not mature enough to solve the problem without human assistance. In order to tackle the identified challenges, in this thesis, we make the following contributions: (1) We introduce a new corpus on the basis of the Snopes fact-checking website that contains real fact-checking instances and provides high-quality annotations for the different sub-tasks in the fact-checking process. In addition to the corpus, we release our corpus creation methodology that allows for efficiently creating large datasets with a high inter-annotator agreement in order to train machine learning models for automated fact-checking. (2) In order to address the drawbacks of current automated fact-checking systems, we propose a pipeline approach that consists of the four sub-systems: document retrieval, stance detection, evidence extraction, and claim validation. Since today’s machine learning models are not advanced enough to complete the task without human assistance, our pipeline approach is designed to help fact-checkers to speed up the fact-checking process rather than taking over the job entirely. Our pipeline is able to process raw text and thus, make use of the large amount of textual information available on the web, but at the same time, it is transparent, as the outputs of sub-components of the pipeline can be observed. Thus, the different parts of the fact-checking process are automated and potential errors can be identified and traced back to their origin. (3) In order to assess the performance of the developed system, we evaluate the sub-components of the pipeline in highly competitive shared tasks. The stance detection component of the system is evaluated in the Fake News Challenge reaching the second rank out of 50 competing systems.2 The document retrieval component together with the evidence extraction sub-system and the claim validation component are evaluated in the FEVER shared task.3 The first two systems combined reach the first rank in the FEVER shared task Sentence Ranking sub-task outperforming 23 other competing systems. The claim validation component reaches the third rank in the FEVER Recognizing Textual Entailment sub-task. (4) We evaluate our pipeline system, as well as other promising machine learning models for automated fact-checking, on our newly constructed Snopes fact-checking corpus. The results show that even though the systems are able to reach reasonable performance on other datasets, the systems under-perform on our newly created corpus. Our analysis reveals that the more realistic fact-checking problem setting defined by our corpus is more challenging than the problem setting posed by other fact-checking corpora. We therefore conclude that further research is required in order to increase the performance of the automated systems in real fact-checking scenarios.