Two-equation model computations of high-speed (ma=2.25, 7.2), turbulent boundary layers

The objective of this research is to assess the performance of two popularReynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models, standard k-E and k-w, andto suggest modifications to improve model predictions for high-speed flows. Numerical simulations of turbulent ow past a at plate are performed at M1 = 2:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arasanipalai, Sriram Sharan
Other Authors: Anand, N.K.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3186
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3186
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-3186
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-31862013-01-08T10:40:10ZTwo-equation model computations of high-speed (ma=2.25, 7.2), turbulent boundary layersArasanipalai, Sriram Sharanhigh-speed flowsrealizablityturbulent Prandtl numberThe objective of this research is to assess the performance of two popularReynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models, standard k-E and k-w, andto suggest modifications to improve model predictions for high-speed flows. Numerical simulations of turbulent ow past a at plate are performed at M1 = 2:25; 7:2.The results from these two Mach number cases are compared with Direct NumericalSimulation (DNS) results from Pirozzoli et al. (2004) and experimental results fromHorstman & Owen (1975). The effect of the Boussinesq coefficient (Cu) and turbulenttransport coefficients (sigmak; sigmaE; sigma; sigma*) on the boundary layer ow is examined. Further,the performance of a new model with realizability-based correction to Cu and corresponding modifications to sigma; sigma* is examined. The modification to Cu is based oncontrolling the ratio of production to dissipation of kinetic energy (P/E=1). The firstchoice of P/E = 1 ensures that there is no accumulation of kinetic energy in stagnation or free-stream regions of the ow. The second choice of P/E= 1:6 holds underthe assumption of a homogeneous shear ow. It is observed that the new model'sperformance is similar to that of the existing RANS models, which is expected for asimple ow over a at plate. Finally, the role of turbulent Prandtl number (Prt) intemperature and density predictions is established. The results indicate that the k-wmodel's performance is better compared to that of the standard k-E model for highMach number flows. A modification to Cu must be accompanied with correspondingchanges to sigmak; sigmaE; sigma; sigma* for an accurate log-layer prediction. The results also indicate that a Prt variation is required across the boundary layer for improved temperatureand density predictions in high-speed flows.Anand, N.K.Girimaji, Sharath S.2010-01-15T00:06:53Z2010-01-16T01:24:19Z2010-01-15T00:06:53Z2010-01-16T01:24:19Z2008-122009-05-15BookThesisElectronic Thesistextelectronicapplication/pdfborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3186http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3186en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic high-speed flows
realizablity
turbulent Prandtl number
spellingShingle high-speed flows
realizablity
turbulent Prandtl number
Arasanipalai, Sriram Sharan
Two-equation model computations of high-speed (ma=2.25, 7.2), turbulent boundary layers
description The objective of this research is to assess the performance of two popularReynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models, standard k-E and k-w, andto suggest modifications to improve model predictions for high-speed flows. Numerical simulations of turbulent ow past a at plate are performed at M1 = 2:25; 7:2.The results from these two Mach number cases are compared with Direct NumericalSimulation (DNS) results from Pirozzoli et al. (2004) and experimental results fromHorstman & Owen (1975). The effect of the Boussinesq coefficient (Cu) and turbulenttransport coefficients (sigmak; sigmaE; sigma; sigma*) on the boundary layer ow is examined. Further,the performance of a new model with realizability-based correction to Cu and corresponding modifications to sigma; sigma* is examined. The modification to Cu is based oncontrolling the ratio of production to dissipation of kinetic energy (P/E=1). The firstchoice of P/E = 1 ensures that there is no accumulation of kinetic energy in stagnation or free-stream regions of the ow. The second choice of P/E= 1:6 holds underthe assumption of a homogeneous shear ow. It is observed that the new model'sperformance is similar to that of the existing RANS models, which is expected for asimple ow over a at plate. Finally, the role of turbulent Prandtl number (Prt) intemperature and density predictions is established. The results indicate that the k-wmodel's performance is better compared to that of the standard k-E model for highMach number flows. A modification to Cu must be accompanied with correspondingchanges to sigmak; sigmaE; sigma; sigma* for an accurate log-layer prediction. The results also indicate that a Prt variation is required across the boundary layer for improved temperatureand density predictions in high-speed flows.
author2 Anand, N.K.
author_facet Anand, N.K.
Arasanipalai, Sriram Sharan
author Arasanipalai, Sriram Sharan
author_sort Arasanipalai, Sriram Sharan
title Two-equation model computations of high-speed (ma=2.25, 7.2), turbulent boundary layers
title_short Two-equation model computations of high-speed (ma=2.25, 7.2), turbulent boundary layers
title_full Two-equation model computations of high-speed (ma=2.25, 7.2), turbulent boundary layers
title_fullStr Two-equation model computations of high-speed (ma=2.25, 7.2), turbulent boundary layers
title_full_unstemmed Two-equation model computations of high-speed (ma=2.25, 7.2), turbulent boundary layers
title_sort two-equation model computations of high-speed (ma=2.25, 7.2), turbulent boundary layers
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3186
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3186
work_keys_str_mv AT arasanipalaisriramsharan twoequationmodelcomputationsofhighspeedma22572turbulentboundarylayers
_version_ 1716504563807158272