Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes
Gas-to-liquid (GTL) process involves the chemical conversion of natural gas (or other gas sources) into synthetic crude that can be upgraded and separated into different useful hydrocarbon fractions including liquid transportation fuels. A leading GTL technology is the Fischer Tropsch process. The o...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131 http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131 |
id |
ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-3131 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-31312013-01-08T10:40:06ZSimulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processesBao, BupingGTLFTGas-to-liquid (GTL) process involves the chemical conversion of natural gas (or other gas sources) into synthetic crude that can be upgraded and separated into different useful hydrocarbon fractions including liquid transportation fuels. A leading GTL technology is the Fischer Tropsch process. The objective of this work is to provide a techno-economic analysis of the GTL process and to identify optimization and integration opportunities for cost saving and reduction of energy usage and environmental impact. First, a basecase flowsheet is synthesized to include the key processing steps of the plant. Then, computer-aided process simulation is carried out to determine the key mass and energy flows, performance criteria, and equipment specifications. Next, energy and mass integration studies are performed to address the following items: (a) heating and cooling utilities, (b) combined heat and power (process cogeneration), (c) management of process water, (c) optimization of tail-gas allocation, and (d) recovery of catalystsupporting hydrocarbon solvents. Finally, an economic analysis is undertaken to determine the plant capacity needed to achieve the break-even point and to estimate the return on investment for the base-case study. After integration, 884 million $/yr is saved from heat integration, 246 million $/yr from heat cogeneration, and 22 million $/yr from water management. Based on 128,000 barrels per day (BPD) of products, at least 68,000 BPD capacity is needed to keep the process profitable, with the return on investment (ROI) of 5.1%. Compared to 8 $/1000 SCF natural gas, 5 $/1000 SCF price can increase the ROI to 16.2%.El-Halwagi, M. Mahmoud2010-01-15T00:08:23Z2010-01-16T01:20:28Z2010-01-15T00:08:23Z2010-01-16T01:20:28Z2008-122009-05-15BookThesisElectronic Thesistextelectronicapplication/pdfborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
GTL FT |
spellingShingle |
GTL FT Bao, Buping Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes |
description |
Gas-to-liquid (GTL) process involves the chemical conversion of natural gas (or other
gas sources) into synthetic crude that can be upgraded and separated into different useful
hydrocarbon fractions including liquid transportation fuels. A leading GTL technology is
the Fischer Tropsch process. The objective of this work is to provide a techno-economic
analysis of the GTL process and to identify optimization and integration opportunities
for cost saving and reduction of energy usage and environmental impact. First, a basecase
flowsheet is synthesized to include the key processing steps of the plant. Then,
computer-aided process simulation is carried out to determine the key mass and energy
flows, performance criteria, and equipment specifications. Next, energy and mass
integration studies are performed to address the following items: (a) heating and cooling
utilities, (b) combined heat and power (process cogeneration), (c) management of
process water, (c) optimization of tail-gas allocation, and (d) recovery of catalystsupporting
hydrocarbon solvents. Finally, an economic analysis is undertaken to
determine the plant capacity needed to achieve the break-even point and to estimate the
return on investment for the base-case study. After integration, 884 million $/yr is saved
from heat integration, 246 million $/yr from heat cogeneration, and 22 million $/yr from
water management. Based on 128,000 barrels per day (BPD) of products, at least 68,000
BPD capacity is needed to keep the process profitable, with the return on investment
(ROI) of 5.1%. Compared to 8 $/1000 SCF natural gas, 5 $/1000 SCF price can increase
the ROI to 16.2%. |
author2 |
El-Halwagi, M. Mahmoud |
author_facet |
El-Halwagi, M. Mahmoud Bao, Buping |
author |
Bao, Buping |
author_sort |
Bao, Buping |
title |
Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes |
title_short |
Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes |
title_full |
Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes |
title_fullStr |
Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes |
title_sort |
simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131 http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT baobuping simulationintegrationandeconomicanalysisofgastoliquidprocesses |
_version_ |
1716504221322313728 |