Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes

Gas-to-liquid (GTL) process involves the chemical conversion of natural gas (or other gas sources) into synthetic crude that can be upgraded and separated into different useful hydrocarbon fractions including liquid transportation fuels. A leading GTL technology is the Fischer Tropsch process. The o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bao, Buping
Other Authors: El-Halwagi, M. Mahmoud
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2010
Subjects:
GTL
FT
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-3131
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-31312013-01-08T10:40:06ZSimulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processesBao, BupingGTLFTGas-to-liquid (GTL) process involves the chemical conversion of natural gas (or other gas sources) into synthetic crude that can be upgraded and separated into different useful hydrocarbon fractions including liquid transportation fuels. A leading GTL technology is the Fischer Tropsch process. The objective of this work is to provide a techno-economic analysis of the GTL process and to identify optimization and integration opportunities for cost saving and reduction of energy usage and environmental impact. First, a basecase flowsheet is synthesized to include the key processing steps of the plant. Then, computer-aided process simulation is carried out to determine the key mass and energy flows, performance criteria, and equipment specifications. Next, energy and mass integration studies are performed to address the following items: (a) heating and cooling utilities, (b) combined heat and power (process cogeneration), (c) management of process water, (c) optimization of tail-gas allocation, and (d) recovery of catalystsupporting hydrocarbon solvents. Finally, an economic analysis is undertaken to determine the plant capacity needed to achieve the break-even point and to estimate the return on investment for the base-case study. After integration, 884 million $/yr is saved from heat integration, 246 million $/yr from heat cogeneration, and 22 million $/yr from water management. Based on 128,000 barrels per day (BPD) of products, at least 68,000 BPD capacity is needed to keep the process profitable, with the return on investment (ROI) of 5.1%. Compared to 8 $/1000 SCF natural gas, 5 $/1000 SCF price can increase the ROI to 16.2%.El-Halwagi, M. Mahmoud2010-01-15T00:08:23Z2010-01-16T01:20:28Z2010-01-15T00:08:23Z2010-01-16T01:20:28Z2008-122009-05-15BookThesisElectronic Thesistextelectronicapplication/pdfborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic GTL
FT
spellingShingle GTL
FT
Bao, Buping
Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes
description Gas-to-liquid (GTL) process involves the chemical conversion of natural gas (or other gas sources) into synthetic crude that can be upgraded and separated into different useful hydrocarbon fractions including liquid transportation fuels. A leading GTL technology is the Fischer Tropsch process. The objective of this work is to provide a techno-economic analysis of the GTL process and to identify optimization and integration opportunities for cost saving and reduction of energy usage and environmental impact. First, a basecase flowsheet is synthesized to include the key processing steps of the plant. Then, computer-aided process simulation is carried out to determine the key mass and energy flows, performance criteria, and equipment specifications. Next, energy and mass integration studies are performed to address the following items: (a) heating and cooling utilities, (b) combined heat and power (process cogeneration), (c) management of process water, (c) optimization of tail-gas allocation, and (d) recovery of catalystsupporting hydrocarbon solvents. Finally, an economic analysis is undertaken to determine the plant capacity needed to achieve the break-even point and to estimate the return on investment for the base-case study. After integration, 884 million $/yr is saved from heat integration, 246 million $/yr from heat cogeneration, and 22 million $/yr from water management. Based on 128,000 barrels per day (BPD) of products, at least 68,000 BPD capacity is needed to keep the process profitable, with the return on investment (ROI) of 5.1%. Compared to 8 $/1000 SCF natural gas, 5 $/1000 SCF price can increase the ROI to 16.2%.
author2 El-Halwagi, M. Mahmoud
author_facet El-Halwagi, M. Mahmoud
Bao, Buping
author Bao, Buping
author_sort Bao, Buping
title Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes
title_short Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes
title_full Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes
title_fullStr Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes
title_full_unstemmed Simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes
title_sort simulation, integration, and economic analysis of gas-to-liquid processes
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3131
work_keys_str_mv AT baobuping simulationintegrationandeconomicanalysisofgastoliquidprocesses
_version_ 1716504221322313728