Physical Security System Sensitivity to DBT Perturbations

This thesis examines how perturbing selected adversary capabilities in a design basis threat (DBT) may affect the assessment of a facility's security system performance. We found that using a strictly defined DBT to design and analytically test facility security systems can lead to invalid ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Conchewski, Curtis
Other Authors: Charlton, William
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2012
Subjects:
PPS
DBT
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11753
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11753
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2012-08-117532013-01-08T10:44:43ZPhysical Security System Sensitivity to DBT PerturbationsConchewski, Curtisphysical protection systemPPSphysical security systemdesign basis threatDBTnonproliferationphysical securityThis thesis examines how perturbing selected adversary capabilities in a design basis threat (DBT) may affect the assessment of a facility's security system performance. We found that using a strictly defined DBT to design and analytically test facility security systems can lead to invalid assessments that security measures are meeting standards. Design Basis Threats are intended to represent the most severe yet realistic attack a facility might face. However, the static nature of the standard DBT makes it unable to test the performance of a facility security system in the case where a specialized adversary may possess different capabilities than defined in the DBT. Our analysis of security system performance for various modeled facilities revealed significant vulnerabilities to certain perturbations of adversary capabilities. These vulnerabilities went undetected when the original strictly defined graded DBT was used in the assessment procedure. By maximizing one adversary capability at the expense of others, a specialized adversary force was able to efficiently defeat each facility. To address this problem, we proposed employing a so-called "point-based" DBT as an alternative to the existing strictly defined DBT. In a point-based DBT, multiple scenarios are assessed that test different sets of adversary capabilities to better uncover and understand any security system vulnerabilities that may exist. We believe the benefit of identifying these site-specific security vulnerabilities will outweigh the additional cost of generating a point-based DBT, especially if the vulnerabilities are identified during the initial design of the security system.Charlton, WilliamBoyle, David2012-10-19T15:30:49Z2012-10-22T18:04:11Z2012-10-19T15:30:49Z2012-082012-10-19August 2012thesistextapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11753en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic physical protection system
PPS
physical security system
design basis threat
DBT
nonproliferation
physical security
spellingShingle physical protection system
PPS
physical security system
design basis threat
DBT
nonproliferation
physical security
Conchewski, Curtis
Physical Security System Sensitivity to DBT Perturbations
description This thesis examines how perturbing selected adversary capabilities in a design basis threat (DBT) may affect the assessment of a facility's security system performance. We found that using a strictly defined DBT to design and analytically test facility security systems can lead to invalid assessments that security measures are meeting standards. Design Basis Threats are intended to represent the most severe yet realistic attack a facility might face. However, the static nature of the standard DBT makes it unable to test the performance of a facility security system in the case where a specialized adversary may possess different capabilities than defined in the DBT. Our analysis of security system performance for various modeled facilities revealed significant vulnerabilities to certain perturbations of adversary capabilities. These vulnerabilities went undetected when the original strictly defined graded DBT was used in the assessment procedure. By maximizing one adversary capability at the expense of others, a specialized adversary force was able to efficiently defeat each facility. To address this problem, we proposed employing a so-called "point-based" DBT as an alternative to the existing strictly defined DBT. In a point-based DBT, multiple scenarios are assessed that test different sets of adversary capabilities to better uncover and understand any security system vulnerabilities that may exist. We believe the benefit of identifying these site-specific security vulnerabilities will outweigh the additional cost of generating a point-based DBT, especially if the vulnerabilities are identified during the initial design of the security system.
author2 Charlton, William
author_facet Charlton, William
Conchewski, Curtis
author Conchewski, Curtis
author_sort Conchewski, Curtis
title Physical Security System Sensitivity to DBT Perturbations
title_short Physical Security System Sensitivity to DBT Perturbations
title_full Physical Security System Sensitivity to DBT Perturbations
title_fullStr Physical Security System Sensitivity to DBT Perturbations
title_full_unstemmed Physical Security System Sensitivity to DBT Perturbations
title_sort physical security system sensitivity to dbt perturbations
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-08-11753
work_keys_str_mv AT conchewskicurtis physicalsecuritysystemsensitivitytodbtperturbations
_version_ 1716505659390820352