Exploring the Relationship between Resilience and Learning Styles as Predictors of Academic Persistence in Engineering

In recent years, engineering education has witnessed a sharp increase in research aimed at the outcomes of academic success and persistence within engineering programs. However, research surrounding the key forces shaping student persistence remains unknown. This study explores enhancements and broa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Walton, Shannon Deonne
Other Authors: Watson, Karan
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2010-12-8954
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2010-12-8954
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2010-12-89542013-01-08T10:42:55ZExploring the Relationship between Resilience and Learning Styles as Predictors of Academic Persistence in EngineeringWalton, Shannon Deonneresilience theorylearning stylesacademic persistencepersistence in engineeringindex of learning stylespersonal resilience questionnaireIn recent years, engineering education has witnessed a sharp increase in research aimed at the outcomes of academic success and persistence within engineering programs. However, research surrounding the key forces shaping student persistence remains unknown. This study explores enhancements and broader perspectives of learning; the relationship among dimensions of resilience theory and learning styles in engineering students to identify elements of both that contribute towards academic persistence and to determine which components of both contribute towards strengthening students’ academic persistence in engineering. The study was conducted using two quantitative self-reporting instruments to measure resilience and learning style preference, the Personal Resilience Questionnaire (PQR) and the Index of Learning Styles (ILS). Retention was measured as the continuous enrollment of a student into the second semester of the first-year engineering program. Results indicate that the following have a statistically significant effect on student persistence in engineering programs at Texas A&M University: learning style construct sequential; resilience constructs positive (self) and focus; with both tools combined, positive (self), organized, positive (world), flexibility (self) and focus; and a newly combined construct, Walton’s self-efficacy.Watson, Karan2012-02-14T22:18:56Z2012-02-16T16:14:35Z2012-02-14T22:18:56Z2012-02-16T16:14:35Z2010-122012-02-14December 2010thesistextapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2010-12-8954en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic resilience theory
learning styles
academic persistence
persistence in engineering
index of learning styles
personal resilience questionnaire
spellingShingle resilience theory
learning styles
academic persistence
persistence in engineering
index of learning styles
personal resilience questionnaire
Walton, Shannon Deonne
Exploring the Relationship between Resilience and Learning Styles as Predictors of Academic Persistence in Engineering
description In recent years, engineering education has witnessed a sharp increase in research aimed at the outcomes of academic success and persistence within engineering programs. However, research surrounding the key forces shaping student persistence remains unknown. This study explores enhancements and broader perspectives of learning; the relationship among dimensions of resilience theory and learning styles in engineering students to identify elements of both that contribute towards academic persistence and to determine which components of both contribute towards strengthening students’ academic persistence in engineering. The study was conducted using two quantitative self-reporting instruments to measure resilience and learning style preference, the Personal Resilience Questionnaire (PQR) and the Index of Learning Styles (ILS). Retention was measured as the continuous enrollment of a student into the second semester of the first-year engineering program. Results indicate that the following have a statistically significant effect on student persistence in engineering programs at Texas A&M University: learning style construct sequential; resilience constructs positive (self) and focus; with both tools combined, positive (self), organized, positive (world), flexibility (self) and focus; and a newly combined construct, Walton’s self-efficacy.
author2 Watson, Karan
author_facet Watson, Karan
Walton, Shannon Deonne
author Walton, Shannon Deonne
author_sort Walton, Shannon Deonne
title Exploring the Relationship between Resilience and Learning Styles as Predictors of Academic Persistence in Engineering
title_short Exploring the Relationship between Resilience and Learning Styles as Predictors of Academic Persistence in Engineering
title_full Exploring the Relationship between Resilience and Learning Styles as Predictors of Academic Persistence in Engineering
title_fullStr Exploring the Relationship between Resilience and Learning Styles as Predictors of Academic Persistence in Engineering
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Relationship between Resilience and Learning Styles as Predictors of Academic Persistence in Engineering
title_sort exploring the relationship between resilience and learning styles as predictors of academic persistence in engineering
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2010-12-8954
work_keys_str_mv AT waltonshannondeonne exploringtherelationshipbetweenresilienceandlearningstylesaspredictorsofacademicpersistenceinengineering
_version_ 1716505139283492864