Analysis of 2009 ENR Best Projects in Texas to Determine the Impact of Project Delivery System Used

Competitive Bidding, Competitive Sealed Proposal, construction management agency, construction management at risk, Design-Build, Design-Build-Bridging, and job order contracting are seven project delivery methods that are commonly used in the state of Texas today. This paper empirically compares the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rajan, Navaneethan
Other Authors: Smith, James
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2010-12-8925
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2010-12-8925
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2010-12-89252013-01-08T10:42:01ZAnalysis of 2009 ENR Best Projects in Texas to Determine the Impact of Project Delivery System UsedRajan, NavaneethanProject Delivery MethodEngineering News RecordENR Best ProjectsDesign-BuildConstruction Management at RiskCompetitive Bidding, Competitive Sealed Proposal, construction management agency, construction management at risk, Design-Build, Design-Build-Bridging, and job order contracting are seven project delivery methods that are commonly used in the state of Texas today. This paper empirically compares the cost, schedule, and change order management performance of these project delivery methods in 2009 Engineering News Record (ENR) Best Construction Projects in Texas, using the data collected from the projects representative of the population. Also information is collected on lessons learned from these projects. The thesis included development of survey instrument, getting approval from Institutional Review Board (IRB), data collection from the industry, statistical analysis and inferences. Based on the data collected, project performances were measured in terms of five identified variables and then plotted in the form of probability distribution curves to understand the characteristics of the target population. Then, the results were grouped into six categories based on project delivery methods used and compared to understand their impacts on these projects. Findings revealed predominant usage of CM at Risk PDM, and better cost and schedule performance of CM at Risk, Design-Build, and Owner customized PDM. Detailed performance metrics, results, interpretations and conclusions are presented.Smith, James2011-02-22T22:24:43Z2011-02-22T23:50:16Z2011-02-22T22:24:43Z2011-02-22T23:50:16Z2010-122011-02-22December 2010BookThesisElectronic Thesistextapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2010-12-8925en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Project Delivery Method
Engineering News Record
ENR Best Projects
Design-Build
Construction Management at Risk
spellingShingle Project Delivery Method
Engineering News Record
ENR Best Projects
Design-Build
Construction Management at Risk
Rajan, Navaneethan
Analysis of 2009 ENR Best Projects in Texas to Determine the Impact of Project Delivery System Used
description Competitive Bidding, Competitive Sealed Proposal, construction management agency, construction management at risk, Design-Build, Design-Build-Bridging, and job order contracting are seven project delivery methods that are commonly used in the state of Texas today. This paper empirically compares the cost, schedule, and change order management performance of these project delivery methods in 2009 Engineering News Record (ENR) Best Construction Projects in Texas, using the data collected from the projects representative of the population. Also information is collected on lessons learned from these projects. The thesis included development of survey instrument, getting approval from Institutional Review Board (IRB), data collection from the industry, statistical analysis and inferences. Based on the data collected, project performances were measured in terms of five identified variables and then plotted in the form of probability distribution curves to understand the characteristics of the target population. Then, the results were grouped into six categories based on project delivery methods used and compared to understand their impacts on these projects. Findings revealed predominant usage of CM at Risk PDM, and better cost and schedule performance of CM at Risk, Design-Build, and Owner customized PDM. Detailed performance metrics, results, interpretations and conclusions are presented.
author2 Smith, James
author_facet Smith, James
Rajan, Navaneethan
author Rajan, Navaneethan
author_sort Rajan, Navaneethan
title Analysis of 2009 ENR Best Projects in Texas to Determine the Impact of Project Delivery System Used
title_short Analysis of 2009 ENR Best Projects in Texas to Determine the Impact of Project Delivery System Used
title_full Analysis of 2009 ENR Best Projects in Texas to Determine the Impact of Project Delivery System Used
title_fullStr Analysis of 2009 ENR Best Projects in Texas to Determine the Impact of Project Delivery System Used
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of 2009 ENR Best Projects in Texas to Determine the Impact of Project Delivery System Used
title_sort analysis of 2009 enr best projects in texas to determine the impact of project delivery system used
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2010-12-8925
work_keys_str_mv AT rajannavaneethan analysisof2009enrbestprojectsintexastodeterminetheimpactofprojectdeliverysystemused
_version_ 1716504921542492160