Estimating Distribution and Abundance of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys in South Texas

Sustainable management of wildlife populations relies on accurate estimates of population size as harvest recommendations are dependent on estimates of sustainable surplus. Techniques for surveying wild turkey populations in Texas are constrained by land access issues, requiring that new methods be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Caveny, Robert J.
Other Authors: Peterson, Markus J.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-08-858
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2009-08-858
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2009-08-8582013-01-08T10:41:24ZEstimating Distribution and Abundance of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys in South TexasCaveny, Robert J.Rio Grande wild turkeydistributionabundanceaerial surveyroost countsSustainable management of wildlife populations relies on accurate estimates of population size as harvest recommendations are dependent on estimates of sustainable surplus. Techniques for surveying wild turkey populations in Texas are constrained by land access issues, requiring that new methods be developed for population monitoring. I evaluated a combined approach using patch-occupancy modeling at broad spatial scales and intensive double observer roost surveys at local scales to estimate Rio Grande wild turkey (Meleagris gallapavo intermedia) distribution and abundance. I flew replicated aerial surveys during 2007 and 2008 to evaluate distribution of Rio Grande wild turkeys in the south Texas Coastal Sand Plains. I used a double observer approach to estimate local scale abundance. I used a single observer approach to estimate temporal variation in roost use. Detection probabilities from aerial surveys ranged between 0.24 (SE = 0.031) and 0.30 (SE = 0.083). Spatial parameters that influenced distribution of wild turkeys included size of suitable roosting habitat patches and distance to the nearest suitable roosting habitat. I conducted 100 inter-patch double observer roost counts, with counts ranging between 0 to 183 individuals. Average detection probabilities for observers were ~0.90. Roost level occupancy was ~0.84 with detection probabilities between 0.69 (SE = 0.107) and 0.79 (SE = 0.091). Based on my results, aerial surveys combined with local abundance estimation may be one viable alternative to monitor turkey populations over large spatial scales, by reducing overall survey effort without loss of estimated precision.Peterson, Markus J.Collier, Bret A.2010-10-12T22:31:06Z2010-10-14T16:00:14Z2010-10-12T22:31:06Z2010-10-14T16:00:14Z2009-082010-10-12August 2009BookThesisElectronic Thesistextapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-08-858en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Rio Grande wild turkey
distribution
abundance
aerial survey
roost counts
spellingShingle Rio Grande wild turkey
distribution
abundance
aerial survey
roost counts
Caveny, Robert J.
Estimating Distribution and Abundance of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys in South Texas
description Sustainable management of wildlife populations relies on accurate estimates of population size as harvest recommendations are dependent on estimates of sustainable surplus. Techniques for surveying wild turkey populations in Texas are constrained by land access issues, requiring that new methods be developed for population monitoring. I evaluated a combined approach using patch-occupancy modeling at broad spatial scales and intensive double observer roost surveys at local scales to estimate Rio Grande wild turkey (Meleagris gallapavo intermedia) distribution and abundance. I flew replicated aerial surveys during 2007 and 2008 to evaluate distribution of Rio Grande wild turkeys in the south Texas Coastal Sand Plains. I used a double observer approach to estimate local scale abundance. I used a single observer approach to estimate temporal variation in roost use. Detection probabilities from aerial surveys ranged between 0.24 (SE = 0.031) and 0.30 (SE = 0.083). Spatial parameters that influenced distribution of wild turkeys included size of suitable roosting habitat patches and distance to the nearest suitable roosting habitat. I conducted 100 inter-patch double observer roost counts, with counts ranging between 0 to 183 individuals. Average detection probabilities for observers were ~0.90. Roost level occupancy was ~0.84 with detection probabilities between 0.69 (SE = 0.107) and 0.79 (SE = 0.091). Based on my results, aerial surveys combined with local abundance estimation may be one viable alternative to monitor turkey populations over large spatial scales, by reducing overall survey effort without loss of estimated precision.
author2 Peterson, Markus J.
author_facet Peterson, Markus J.
Caveny, Robert J.
author Caveny, Robert J.
author_sort Caveny, Robert J.
title Estimating Distribution and Abundance of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys in South Texas
title_short Estimating Distribution and Abundance of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys in South Texas
title_full Estimating Distribution and Abundance of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys in South Texas
title_fullStr Estimating Distribution and Abundance of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys in South Texas
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Distribution and Abundance of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys in South Texas
title_sort estimating distribution and abundance of rio grande wild turkeys in south texas
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-08-858
work_keys_str_mv AT cavenyrobertj estimatingdistributionandabundanceofriograndewildturkeysinsouthtexas
_version_ 1716504671644811264