From the schematic to the symbolic: the radical possibilities of the imagination in Kant's third Critique

In this thesis it is argued that Kant's Copernican turn depends on his doctrine of the imagination, and that by understanding the role of imagination as symbolic rather than schematic, the resources are provided to show that his critical philosophy has more radical possibilities than those of h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Camp, Ty D.
Other Authors: George, Theodore
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2008-05-7
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2008-05-7
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2008-05-7
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2008-05-72013-01-08T10:40:56ZFrom the schematic to the symbolic: the radical possibilities of the imagination in Kant's third CritiqueCamp, Ty D.Kantimaginationconstructivismthird critiquecritique of judgmentschematicsymbolicreflective judgmentdeterminative judgmentcritical philosophygerman idealismhegelheideggerIn this thesis it is argued that Kant's Copernican turn depends on his doctrine of the imagination, and that by understanding the role of imagination as symbolic rather than schematic, the resources are provided to show that his critical philosophy has more radical possibilities than those of his post-Kantian critics. To display this, it is first pointed out that the crucial role the imagination plays in Kant's Copernican turn is not fully developed in his first Critique. Next, it is argued that Kant's doctrine of the imagination is not fully realized until the third Critique in which Kant radicalizes his notion of constructivism by introducing a distinction between determinative and reflective judgments. Finally, it is suggested that while Hegel believes that Kant?s idealism is not dynamic enough to support a full-fledged constructivism, in fact, when Kant?s mature doctrine of the imagination is taken into account, this is no longer the case because Kant believes that our particular experiences of the world unfold artistically and creatively according to the work of the imagination. It is suggested, therefore, that in many ways Kant anticipates the developments of thinkers such as Hegel and other post- Kantians and may even continue to lie beyond them.George, Theodore2010-01-16T02:27:22Z2010-01-16T02:27:22Z2008-052010-01-16T02:27:22ZBookThesisElectronic Thesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2008-05-7http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2008-05-7en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Kant
imagination
constructivism
third critique
critique of judgment
schematic
symbolic
reflective judgment
determinative judgment
critical philosophy
german idealism
hegel
heidegger
spellingShingle Kant
imagination
constructivism
third critique
critique of judgment
schematic
symbolic
reflective judgment
determinative judgment
critical philosophy
german idealism
hegel
heidegger
Camp, Ty D.
From the schematic to the symbolic: the radical possibilities of the imagination in Kant's third Critique
description In this thesis it is argued that Kant's Copernican turn depends on his doctrine of the imagination, and that by understanding the role of imagination as symbolic rather than schematic, the resources are provided to show that his critical philosophy has more radical possibilities than those of his post-Kantian critics. To display this, it is first pointed out that the crucial role the imagination plays in Kant's Copernican turn is not fully developed in his first Critique. Next, it is argued that Kant's doctrine of the imagination is not fully realized until the third Critique in which Kant radicalizes his notion of constructivism by introducing a distinction between determinative and reflective judgments. Finally, it is suggested that while Hegel believes that Kant?s idealism is not dynamic enough to support a full-fledged constructivism, in fact, when Kant?s mature doctrine of the imagination is taken into account, this is no longer the case because Kant believes that our particular experiences of the world unfold artistically and creatively according to the work of the imagination. It is suggested, therefore, that in many ways Kant anticipates the developments of thinkers such as Hegel and other post- Kantians and may even continue to lie beyond them.
author2 George, Theodore
author_facet George, Theodore
Camp, Ty D.
author Camp, Ty D.
author_sort Camp, Ty D.
title From the schematic to the symbolic: the radical possibilities of the imagination in Kant's third Critique
title_short From the schematic to the symbolic: the radical possibilities of the imagination in Kant's third Critique
title_full From the schematic to the symbolic: the radical possibilities of the imagination in Kant's third Critique
title_fullStr From the schematic to the symbolic: the radical possibilities of the imagination in Kant's third Critique
title_full_unstemmed From the schematic to the symbolic: the radical possibilities of the imagination in Kant's third Critique
title_sort from the schematic to the symbolic: the radical possibilities of the imagination in kant's third critique
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2008-05-7
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2008-05-7
work_keys_str_mv AT camptyd fromtheschematictothesymbolictheradicalpossibilitiesoftheimaginationinkantsthirdcritique
_version_ 1716504478842093568