The effects of acid contact time and rock surfaces on acid fracture conductivity

The conductivity created in acid fracturing is a competition between two phenomena: etching of the rock surface and weakening of the rock. This study presents experimental results of acid fracturing conductivity experiments with polymer gelled acid, while varying contact time and rock type. The exp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Melendez Castillo, Maria Georgina
Other Authors: Zhu, Ding
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1956
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1956
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-1956
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-19562013-01-08T10:40:56ZThe effects of acid contact time and rock surfaces on acid fracture conductivityMelendez Castillo, Maria Georginaacid fracturingconductivityThe conductivity created in acid fracturing is a competition between two phenomena: etching of the rock surface and weakening of the rock. This study presents experimental results of acid fracturing conductivity experiments with polymer gelled acid, while varying contact time and rock type. The experiments were conducted in a laboratory facility properly scaled from field to laboratory conditions to account for the hydrodynamic effects that take place in the field. The rocks of study were Indiana limestone, San Andres dolomite and Texas Cream chalk. Our results illustrate that acid fracturing conductivity is governed by the etching pattern of the rock surface and influenced by the hardness of the rock. If channels are created, the fracture is more likely to retain conductivity after closure. The hardness of the rock is the dominating factor to determine the conductivity response when no channeling is present. Among the rocks tested, Texas Cream chalk had the lowest hardness measurement before and after acidizing and the fracture closed at a much lower stress compared with limestone and dolomite. Dolomite had the highest conductivity under all closure stresses even without a channeling pattern. Additionally, it was observed that a higher reduction in rock strength at the contact points for dolomite yielded lower conductivity after closure. The effects of hardness variation on conductivity are higher in dolomite than in limestone and chalk. It is apparent that longer contact times do not always provide higher conductivity after closure.Zhu, Ding2010-01-15T00:15:22Z2010-01-16T02:24:52Z2010-01-15T00:15:22Z2010-01-16T02:24:52Z2007-082009-06-02BookThesisElectronic Thesistextelectronicapplication/pdfborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1956http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1956en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic acid fracturing
conductivity
spellingShingle acid fracturing
conductivity
Melendez Castillo, Maria Georgina
The effects of acid contact time and rock surfaces on acid fracture conductivity
description The conductivity created in acid fracturing is a competition between two phenomena: etching of the rock surface and weakening of the rock. This study presents experimental results of acid fracturing conductivity experiments with polymer gelled acid, while varying contact time and rock type. The experiments were conducted in a laboratory facility properly scaled from field to laboratory conditions to account for the hydrodynamic effects that take place in the field. The rocks of study were Indiana limestone, San Andres dolomite and Texas Cream chalk. Our results illustrate that acid fracturing conductivity is governed by the etching pattern of the rock surface and influenced by the hardness of the rock. If channels are created, the fracture is more likely to retain conductivity after closure. The hardness of the rock is the dominating factor to determine the conductivity response when no channeling is present. Among the rocks tested, Texas Cream chalk had the lowest hardness measurement before and after acidizing and the fracture closed at a much lower stress compared with limestone and dolomite. Dolomite had the highest conductivity under all closure stresses even without a channeling pattern. Additionally, it was observed that a higher reduction in rock strength at the contact points for dolomite yielded lower conductivity after closure. The effects of hardness variation on conductivity are higher in dolomite than in limestone and chalk. It is apparent that longer contact times do not always provide higher conductivity after closure.
author2 Zhu, Ding
author_facet Zhu, Ding
Melendez Castillo, Maria Georgina
author Melendez Castillo, Maria Georgina
author_sort Melendez Castillo, Maria Georgina
title The effects of acid contact time and rock surfaces on acid fracture conductivity
title_short The effects of acid contact time and rock surfaces on acid fracture conductivity
title_full The effects of acid contact time and rock surfaces on acid fracture conductivity
title_fullStr The effects of acid contact time and rock surfaces on acid fracture conductivity
title_full_unstemmed The effects of acid contact time and rock surfaces on acid fracture conductivity
title_sort effects of acid contact time and rock surfaces on acid fracture conductivity
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1956
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1956
work_keys_str_mv AT melendezcastillomariageorgina theeffectsofacidcontacttimeandrocksurfacesonacidfractureconductivity
AT melendezcastillomariageorgina effectsofacidcontacttimeandrocksurfacesonacidfractureconductivity
_version_ 1716504469034762240