Household income pooling and the demand for food: does family financial structure matter?

Research on food consumption and expenditures usually employs the use of unitary models that do not account for type of family financial structure. This research presents two collective models of household behavior, conditional and unconditional models, which were used in the analysis of the househo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perusquia Corres, Ernesto
Other Authors: Davis, George
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1714
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1714
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-1714
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-17142013-01-08T10:40:41ZHousehold income pooling and the demand for food: does family financial structure matter?Perusquia Corres, ErnestoCollective ModelsFamily Financial StructureResearch on food consumption and expenditures usually employs the use of unitary models that do not account for type of family financial structure. This research presents two collective models of household behavior, conditional and unconditional models, which were used in the analysis of the household data that came from the “Parental Time, Role Strain and Children’s Fat Intake and Obesity Related Outcomes”. This research utilized the Generalized Method of Moments in the estimation of the system of expenditures on food at and away from home to test the validity of the unitary model by testing one of the implications of this model, the income pooling hypothesis, as well as family financial structure. It was found that the omission of family financial structure and not the income pooling hypothesis would lead to the incorrect assertion that the unitary model is the correct model for the analysis of intrahousehold allocation. The collective models proposed in this research were found to be preferred to those of the unitary models. These two models, conditional and unconditional, not only allow for the effect of earned and unearned incomes of fathers and mothers to be different, but also incorporate family financial structure into the analysis of expenditures on food at and away from home. This research shows that the parameters of the unitary models are reduced form parameters that do not represent the effect that the variable of interest has on the household expenditures category of interest. This research finds that these reduced form parameters show the total effect which is composed of three parts. First, the change in the expenditure category of interest that comes about from a change in the variable of interest when we hold family financial structure constant. Second, the change in the expenditure category of interest that comes about from a change in the family financial structure. Third, the change in family financial structure that comes about from a change in the variable of interest.Davis, George2010-01-15T00:14:00Z2010-01-16T02:04:30Z2010-01-15T00:14:00Z2010-01-16T02:04:30Z2006-082009-06-02BookThesisElectronic Dissertationtextelectronicapplication/pdfborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1714http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1714en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Collective Models
Family Financial Structure
spellingShingle Collective Models
Family Financial Structure
Perusquia Corres, Ernesto
Household income pooling and the demand for food: does family financial structure matter?
description Research on food consumption and expenditures usually employs the use of unitary models that do not account for type of family financial structure. This research presents two collective models of household behavior, conditional and unconditional models, which were used in the analysis of the household data that came from the “Parental Time, Role Strain and Children’s Fat Intake and Obesity Related Outcomes”. This research utilized the Generalized Method of Moments in the estimation of the system of expenditures on food at and away from home to test the validity of the unitary model by testing one of the implications of this model, the income pooling hypothesis, as well as family financial structure. It was found that the omission of family financial structure and not the income pooling hypothesis would lead to the incorrect assertion that the unitary model is the correct model for the analysis of intrahousehold allocation. The collective models proposed in this research were found to be preferred to those of the unitary models. These two models, conditional and unconditional, not only allow for the effect of earned and unearned incomes of fathers and mothers to be different, but also incorporate family financial structure into the analysis of expenditures on food at and away from home. This research shows that the parameters of the unitary models are reduced form parameters that do not represent the effect that the variable of interest has on the household expenditures category of interest. This research finds that these reduced form parameters show the total effect which is composed of three parts. First, the change in the expenditure category of interest that comes about from a change in the variable of interest when we hold family financial structure constant. Second, the change in the expenditure category of interest that comes about from a change in the family financial structure. Third, the change in family financial structure that comes about from a change in the variable of interest.
author2 Davis, George
author_facet Davis, George
Perusquia Corres, Ernesto
author Perusquia Corres, Ernesto
author_sort Perusquia Corres, Ernesto
title Household income pooling and the demand for food: does family financial structure matter?
title_short Household income pooling and the demand for food: does family financial structure matter?
title_full Household income pooling and the demand for food: does family financial structure matter?
title_fullStr Household income pooling and the demand for food: does family financial structure matter?
title_full_unstemmed Household income pooling and the demand for food: does family financial structure matter?
title_sort household income pooling and the demand for food: does family financial structure matter?
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1714
http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1714
work_keys_str_mv AT perusquiacorresernesto householdincomepoolingandthedemandforfooddoesfamilyfinancialstructurematter
_version_ 1716504395033608192