Design of high efficiency blowers for future aerosol applications

High efficiency air blowers to meet future portable aerosol sampling applications were designed, fabricated, and evaluated. A Centrifugal blower was designed to achieve a flow rate of 100 L/min (1.67 x 10^-3 m^3/s) and a pressure rise of WC " 4 (1000 PA). Commercial computational fluid dynamics...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chadha, Raman
Other Authors: Morrison, Gerald L.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Texas A&M University 2007
Subjects:
CFD
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/5002
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-5002
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-50022013-01-08T10:38:45ZDesign of high efficiency blowers for future aerosol applicationsChadha, RamanBlowersPumpsCFDDesignTurbomachinesHigh EfficiencyHigh efficiency air blowers to meet future portable aerosol sampling applications were designed, fabricated, and evaluated. A Centrifugal blower was designed to achieve a flow rate of 100 L/min (1.67 x 10^-3 m^3/s) and a pressure rise of WC " 4 (1000 PA). Commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, FLUENT 6.1.22, was used extensively throughout the entire design cycle. The machine, Reynolds number (Re) , was around 10^5 suggesting a turbulent flow field. Renormalization Group (RNG) κ−ε turbulent model was used for FLUENT simulations. An existing design was scaled down to meet the design needs. Characteristic curves showing static pressure rise as a function of flow rate through the impeller were generated using FLUENT and these were validated through experiments. Experimentally measured efficiency (ηEXP) for the base-design was around 10%. This was attributed to the low efficiency of the D.C. motor used. CFD simulations, using the κ−ε turbulent model and standard wall function approach, over-predicted the pressure rise values and the percentage error was large. Enhanced wall function under-predicted the pressure rise but gave better agreement (less than 6% error) with experimental results. CFD predicted a blower scaled 70% in planar direction (XZ) and 28% in axial direction (Y) and running at 19200 rpm (70xz_28y@19.2k) as the most appropriate choice. The pressure rise is 1021 Pa at the design flow rate of 100 L/min. FLUENT predicts an efficiency value based on static head (ηFLU) as 53.3%. Efficiency value based on measured static pressure rise value and the electrical energy input to the motor (ηEXP) is 27.4%. This is almost a 2X improvement over the value that one gets with the hand held vacuum system blower.Texas A&M UniversityMorrison, Gerald L.2007-04-25T20:15:53Z2007-04-25T20:15:53Z2005-122007-04-25T20:15:53ZBookThesisElectronic Thesistext7648621 byteselectronicapplication/pdfborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/5002en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Blowers
Pumps
CFD
Design
Turbomachines
High Efficiency
spellingShingle Blowers
Pumps
CFD
Design
Turbomachines
High Efficiency
Chadha, Raman
Design of high efficiency blowers for future aerosol applications
description High efficiency air blowers to meet future portable aerosol sampling applications were designed, fabricated, and evaluated. A Centrifugal blower was designed to achieve a flow rate of 100 L/min (1.67 x 10^-3 m^3/s) and a pressure rise of WC " 4 (1000 PA). Commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, FLUENT 6.1.22, was used extensively throughout the entire design cycle. The machine, Reynolds number (Re) , was around 10^5 suggesting a turbulent flow field. Renormalization Group (RNG) κ−ε turbulent model was used for FLUENT simulations. An existing design was scaled down to meet the design needs. Characteristic curves showing static pressure rise as a function of flow rate through the impeller were generated using FLUENT and these were validated through experiments. Experimentally measured efficiency (ηEXP) for the base-design was around 10%. This was attributed to the low efficiency of the D.C. motor used. CFD simulations, using the κ−ε turbulent model and standard wall function approach, over-predicted the pressure rise values and the percentage error was large. Enhanced wall function under-predicted the pressure rise but gave better agreement (less than 6% error) with experimental results. CFD predicted a blower scaled 70% in planar direction (XZ) and 28% in axial direction (Y) and running at 19200 rpm (70xz_28y@19.2k) as the most appropriate choice. The pressure rise is 1021 Pa at the design flow rate of 100 L/min. FLUENT predicts an efficiency value based on static head (ηFLU) as 53.3%. Efficiency value based on measured static pressure rise value and the electrical energy input to the motor (ηEXP) is 27.4%. This is almost a 2X improvement over the value that one gets with the hand held vacuum system blower.
author2 Morrison, Gerald L.
author_facet Morrison, Gerald L.
Chadha, Raman
author Chadha, Raman
author_sort Chadha, Raman
title Design of high efficiency blowers for future aerosol applications
title_short Design of high efficiency blowers for future aerosol applications
title_full Design of high efficiency blowers for future aerosol applications
title_fullStr Design of high efficiency blowers for future aerosol applications
title_full_unstemmed Design of high efficiency blowers for future aerosol applications
title_sort design of high efficiency blowers for future aerosol applications
publisher Texas A&M University
publishDate 2007
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/5002
work_keys_str_mv AT chadharaman designofhighefficiencyblowersforfutureaerosolapplications
_version_ 1716503620774526976