Evaluation of water production in tight gas sands in the Cotton Valley formation in the Caspiana, Elm Grove and Frierson fields

Normally in tight gas sands, water production is not a problem but in such low permeability reservoirs it is difficult to produce gas at commercial flow rates. Since water is more viscous than gas, very little water is normally produced in low permeability reservoirs. The production of large volumes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ozobeme, Charles Chinedu
Other Authors: Holditch, Stephen A.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Texas A&M University 2007
Subjects:
Gas
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4983
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-4983
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-49832013-01-08T10:38:45ZEvaluation of water production in tight gas sands in the Cotton Valley formation in the Caspiana, Elm Grove and Frierson fieldsOzobeme, Charles ChineduEvaluationWaterProductiuonTightGasSandsCottonValleyFormationCaspianaElm GroveFriersonFieldsNormally in tight gas sands, water production is not a problem but in such low permeability reservoirs it is difficult to produce gas at commercial flow rates. Since water is more viscous than gas, very little water is normally produced in low permeability reservoirs. The production of large volumes of water from tight gas sands, say 50-100 bbls of water per MMcf of gas constitutes a cause for concern. High water production (>200 bbls of water per MMcf of gas) has been observed in the low permeability Cotton Valley sands in the Caspiana, Elm Grove and Frierson fields of North Louisiana. This research evaluates water production in the above tight gas sands using field data provided by Matador Resource, a member of the Crisman Institute in Texas A&M university. The research is aimed at providing realistic reservoir scenarios of excess water production in tight gas sands. Log analysis, property trends and well production profiles have been used in establishing the different scenarios. The reservoir simulation results and the production trends show a possible water source from faults and fractures connecting the Travis Peak/Smackover sands to the Cotton Valley sands. An improved understanding of the reservoir would help in further field development.Texas A&M UniversityHolditch, Stephen A.2007-04-25T20:15:08Z2007-04-25T20:15:08Z2006-122007-04-25T20:15:08ZBookThesisElectronic Thesistext32315713 byteselectronicapplication/pdfborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4983en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Evaluation
Water
Productiuon
Tight
Gas
Sands
Cotton
Valley
Formation
Caspiana
Elm Grove
Frierson
Fields
spellingShingle Evaluation
Water
Productiuon
Tight
Gas
Sands
Cotton
Valley
Formation
Caspiana
Elm Grove
Frierson
Fields
Ozobeme, Charles Chinedu
Evaluation of water production in tight gas sands in the Cotton Valley formation in the Caspiana, Elm Grove and Frierson fields
description Normally in tight gas sands, water production is not a problem but in such low permeability reservoirs it is difficult to produce gas at commercial flow rates. Since water is more viscous than gas, very little water is normally produced in low permeability reservoirs. The production of large volumes of water from tight gas sands, say 50-100 bbls of water per MMcf of gas constitutes a cause for concern. High water production (>200 bbls of water per MMcf of gas) has been observed in the low permeability Cotton Valley sands in the Caspiana, Elm Grove and Frierson fields of North Louisiana. This research evaluates water production in the above tight gas sands using field data provided by Matador Resource, a member of the Crisman Institute in Texas A&M university. The research is aimed at providing realistic reservoir scenarios of excess water production in tight gas sands. Log analysis, property trends and well production profiles have been used in establishing the different scenarios. The reservoir simulation results and the production trends show a possible water source from faults and fractures connecting the Travis Peak/Smackover sands to the Cotton Valley sands. An improved understanding of the reservoir would help in further field development.
author2 Holditch, Stephen A.
author_facet Holditch, Stephen A.
Ozobeme, Charles Chinedu
author Ozobeme, Charles Chinedu
author_sort Ozobeme, Charles Chinedu
title Evaluation of water production in tight gas sands in the Cotton Valley formation in the Caspiana, Elm Grove and Frierson fields
title_short Evaluation of water production in tight gas sands in the Cotton Valley formation in the Caspiana, Elm Grove and Frierson fields
title_full Evaluation of water production in tight gas sands in the Cotton Valley formation in the Caspiana, Elm Grove and Frierson fields
title_fullStr Evaluation of water production in tight gas sands in the Cotton Valley formation in the Caspiana, Elm Grove and Frierson fields
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of water production in tight gas sands in the Cotton Valley formation in the Caspiana, Elm Grove and Frierson fields
title_sort evaluation of water production in tight gas sands in the cotton valley formation in the caspiana, elm grove and frierson fields
publisher Texas A&M University
publishDate 2007
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4983
work_keys_str_mv AT ozobemecharleschinedu evaluationofwaterproductionintightgassandsinthecottonvalleyformationinthecaspianaelmgroveandfriersonfields
_version_ 1716503614525014016