Exploring project collaboration systems in the building industry

The use of Web-Based-Collaboration-Systems (WBCS) continues to grow as part of information technology development in the Architecture-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry. WBCS provide different media channels to support collaboration across geographical distributed teams. However, many companies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laepple, Eberhard Sebastian
Other Authors: Clayton, Mark
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Texas A&M University 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4360
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-4360
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-43602013-01-08T10:38:27ZExploring project collaboration systems in the building industryLaepple, Eberhard SebastianCollaborationCoordination TheoryDesign TheoryInformation HandlingWeb-basedProject ManagementThe use of Web-Based-Collaboration-Systems (WBCS) continues to grow as part of information technology development in the Architecture-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry. WBCS provide different media channels to support collaboration across geographical distributed teams. However, many companies are still hesitant to integrate WBCS. This research provides an understanding of how WBCS are used in practice. Most distinctively, it obtained practice data from several major US architecture firms and examined about 30,000 transactions produced during actual design and planning projects as practicing architects, engineers and consultants used WBCS. The study investigated what information was used and exchanged among participants during the different design stages. This was related to the different media channels of WBCS. The raw project data has been coded and transformed into secondary data through computer-supported content analysis. Based upon categories from previous literature, such as communication, coordination and design theories, the data has been analyzed for sender, receiver, channel and content of information transmitted. The content has been characterized into work tasks, information handling behavior and design activities. Additional interviews with industry professionals produced information that had not been documented through WBCS and that corroborated the analytical findings. The combination of theory, quantitative, and qualitative analysis has been synthesized into a portrait of WBCS usage that was validated through triangulation. The analysis of digital records of design communication from practice through content analysis is a new research methodology in AEC. The evidence supporting design methods theory shows the changes in tasks and information handling in regards to the project phases. It indicates that the most frequent loops of design activity are Evaluation- Analysis-Synthesis and Evaluation-Synthesis-Evaluation. It documents the actual usage of WBCS based on descriptive statistics and Markov models. WBCS was used primarily as a document repository and calendaring tool. The remote team members used it more frequently than centrally located participants. The study shows the limitations of WBCS: none of the verbal communication was captured. More significant, the entire email exchange took place outside the WBCS. WBCS was used very extensively, if the implementation of the system supported the organizational structure and vice versa.Texas A&M UniversityClayton, Mark2006-10-30T23:31:02Z2006-10-30T23:31:02Z2005-082006-10-30T23:31:02ZBookThesisElectronic Dissertationtext1810004 byteselectronicapplication/pdfborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4360en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Collaboration
Coordination Theory
Design Theory
Information Handling
Web-based
Project Management
spellingShingle Collaboration
Coordination Theory
Design Theory
Information Handling
Web-based
Project Management
Laepple, Eberhard Sebastian
Exploring project collaboration systems in the building industry
description The use of Web-Based-Collaboration-Systems (WBCS) continues to grow as part of information technology development in the Architecture-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry. WBCS provide different media channels to support collaboration across geographical distributed teams. However, many companies are still hesitant to integrate WBCS. This research provides an understanding of how WBCS are used in practice. Most distinctively, it obtained practice data from several major US architecture firms and examined about 30,000 transactions produced during actual design and planning projects as practicing architects, engineers and consultants used WBCS. The study investigated what information was used and exchanged among participants during the different design stages. This was related to the different media channels of WBCS. The raw project data has been coded and transformed into secondary data through computer-supported content analysis. Based upon categories from previous literature, such as communication, coordination and design theories, the data has been analyzed for sender, receiver, channel and content of information transmitted. The content has been characterized into work tasks, information handling behavior and design activities. Additional interviews with industry professionals produced information that had not been documented through WBCS and that corroborated the analytical findings. The combination of theory, quantitative, and qualitative analysis has been synthesized into a portrait of WBCS usage that was validated through triangulation. The analysis of digital records of design communication from practice through content analysis is a new research methodology in AEC. The evidence supporting design methods theory shows the changes in tasks and information handling in regards to the project phases. It indicates that the most frequent loops of design activity are Evaluation- Analysis-Synthesis and Evaluation-Synthesis-Evaluation. It documents the actual usage of WBCS based on descriptive statistics and Markov models. WBCS was used primarily as a document repository and calendaring tool. The remote team members used it more frequently than centrally located participants. The study shows the limitations of WBCS: none of the verbal communication was captured. More significant, the entire email exchange took place outside the WBCS. WBCS was used very extensively, if the implementation of the system supported the organizational structure and vice versa.
author2 Clayton, Mark
author_facet Clayton, Mark
Laepple, Eberhard Sebastian
author Laepple, Eberhard Sebastian
author_sort Laepple, Eberhard Sebastian
title Exploring project collaboration systems in the building industry
title_short Exploring project collaboration systems in the building industry
title_full Exploring project collaboration systems in the building industry
title_fullStr Exploring project collaboration systems in the building industry
title_full_unstemmed Exploring project collaboration systems in the building industry
title_sort exploring project collaboration systems in the building industry
publisher Texas A&M University
publishDate 2006
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/4360
work_keys_str_mv AT laeppleeberhardsebastian exploringprojectcollaborationsystemsinthebuildingindustry
_version_ 1716503485084598272