Managing infrastructure systems: who's heard in the decision making process?

Citizen participation includes those activities by citizens who are not public officials that are more or less intended to influence the actions taken by government (Verba & Nie, 1972). Citizen initiated contacts are one such form of participation. In 1999, the volume of complaint and service...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Smith, Sheri LaShel
Other Authors: Seidel, Andrew D.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Texas A&M University 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/298
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-298
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-2982013-01-08T10:37:16ZManaging infrastructure systems: who's heard in the decision making process?Smith, Sheri LaShelcapital improvement programurban service deliverycitizen initiated contactsinfrastructure planningCitizen participation includes those activities by citizens who are not public officials that are more or less intended to influence the actions taken by government (Verba & Nie, 1972). Citizen initiated contacts are one such form of participation. In 1999, the volume of complaint and service related calls received by the Department of Public Works and Engineering equaled almost 20 percent of the city's population. Via Houston's Customer Response Center, these contacts are logged in, directed to the appropriate department and incorporated into the department's infrastructure management system (IMS). The goal of the IMS is to provide a systems approach to making cost-effective decisions about the design, rehabilitation, construction, retrofitting, maintenance or abandonment of the city's infrastructure (Grigg, 1988). To date, the effectiveness of this program is perceived as less than ideal and the public is critical of the results (Graves, 2002). Residents express concerns that infrastructure projects are targeted towards business and industrial areas while neighborhood needs are being ignored. Politicians are concerned that projects are not equally distributed among the districts. Meanwhile, public works' staff are concerned because there isn't enough money to address citizen calls, business and industrial needs and political concerns in addition to the problems they have identified. The purpose of this research is twofold: to determine if citizen initiated contacts have been a significant factor in the selection of water and sewer projects and, to identify other factors that may play a role in the decision making process. This study is longitudinal in nature, covering the time period between 1992 and 1999. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analysis were applied to the various data sets provided by the City of Houston. The results of the analysis supports the following: - Citizen contacts have been significant in determining the allocation of water and sewer CIP projects; however, that has not been consistent through the years. - Factors such as race, class, line type, material, size, age and location also factor into the decision making process.Texas A&M UniversitySeidel, Andrew D.2004-09-30T01:50:43Z2004-09-30T01:50:43Z2005-052004-09-30T01:50:43ZBookThesisElectronic Dissertationtext662599 bytes356858 byteselectronicapplication/pdftext/plainborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/298en_USI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Texas A&M University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic capital improvement program
urban service delivery
citizen initiated contacts
infrastructure planning
spellingShingle capital improvement program
urban service delivery
citizen initiated contacts
infrastructure planning
Smith, Sheri LaShel
Managing infrastructure systems: who's heard in the decision making process?
description Citizen participation includes those activities by citizens who are not public officials that are more or less intended to influence the actions taken by government (Verba & Nie, 1972). Citizen initiated contacts are one such form of participation. In 1999, the volume of complaint and service related calls received by the Department of Public Works and Engineering equaled almost 20 percent of the city's population. Via Houston's Customer Response Center, these contacts are logged in, directed to the appropriate department and incorporated into the department's infrastructure management system (IMS). The goal of the IMS is to provide a systems approach to making cost-effective decisions about the design, rehabilitation, construction, retrofitting, maintenance or abandonment of the city's infrastructure (Grigg, 1988). To date, the effectiveness of this program is perceived as less than ideal and the public is critical of the results (Graves, 2002). Residents express concerns that infrastructure projects are targeted towards business and industrial areas while neighborhood needs are being ignored. Politicians are concerned that projects are not equally distributed among the districts. Meanwhile, public works' staff are concerned because there isn't enough money to address citizen calls, business and industrial needs and political concerns in addition to the problems they have identified. The purpose of this research is twofold: to determine if citizen initiated contacts have been a significant factor in the selection of water and sewer projects and, to identify other factors that may play a role in the decision making process. This study is longitudinal in nature, covering the time period between 1992 and 1999. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analysis were applied to the various data sets provided by the City of Houston. The results of the analysis supports the following: - Citizen contacts have been significant in determining the allocation of water and sewer CIP projects; however, that has not been consistent through the years. - Factors such as race, class, line type, material, size, age and location also factor into the decision making process.
author2 Seidel, Andrew D.
author_facet Seidel, Andrew D.
Smith, Sheri LaShel
author Smith, Sheri LaShel
author_sort Smith, Sheri LaShel
title Managing infrastructure systems: who's heard in the decision making process?
title_short Managing infrastructure systems: who's heard in the decision making process?
title_full Managing infrastructure systems: who's heard in the decision making process?
title_fullStr Managing infrastructure systems: who's heard in the decision making process?
title_full_unstemmed Managing infrastructure systems: who's heard in the decision making process?
title_sort managing infrastructure systems: who's heard in the decision making process?
publisher Texas A&M University
publishDate 2004
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/298
work_keys_str_mv AT smithsherilashel managinginfrastructuresystemswhosheardinthedecisionmakingprocess
_version_ 1716502949542232064