Robust design of control charts for autocorrelated processes with model uncertainty

Statistical process control (SPC) procedures suitable for autocorrelated processes have been extensively investigated in recent years. The most popular method is the residual-based control chart. To implement this method, a time series model, which is usually an autoregressive moving average (ARMA)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lee, Hyun Cheol
Other Authors: Apley, Daniel W.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Texas A&M University 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/2778
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-2778
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-27782013-01-08T10:38:00ZRobust design of control charts for autocorrelated processes with model uncertaintyLee, Hyun Cheolstatistical process controlcontrol chartsrobust designmodel uncertainty,Statistical process control (SPC) procedures suitable for autocorrelated processes have been extensively investigated in recent years. The most popular method is the residual-based control chart. To implement this method, a time series model, which is usually an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model, of the process is required. However, the model must be estimated from data in practice and the resulting ARMA modeling errors are unavoidable. Residual-based control charts are known to be sensitive to ARMA modeling errors and often suffer from inflated false alarm rates. As an alternative, control charts can be applied directly to the autocorrelated data with widened control limits. The widened amount is determined by the autocorrelation function of the process. The alternative method, however, can not be also free from the effects of modeling errors because it relies on an accurate process model to be effective. To compare robustness to the ARMA modeling errors between the preceding two kinds of methods for control charting autocorrelated data, this dissertation investigates the sensitivity analytically. Then, two robust design procedures for residual-based control charts are developed from the result of the sensitivity analysis. The first approach for robust design uses the worst-case (maximum) variance of a chart statistic to guarantee the initial specification of control charts. The second robust design method uses the expected variance of the chart statistic. The resulting control limits are widened by an amount that depends on the variance of chart statistic - maximum or expected - as a function of (among other things) the parameter estimation error covariances.Texas A&M UniversityApley, Daniel W.Ding, Yu2005-11-01T15:51:42Z2005-11-01T15:51:42Z2004-082005-11-01T15:51:42ZBookThesisElectronic Dissertationtext1868390 byteselectronicapplication/pdfborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/2778en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic statistical process control
control charts
robust design
model uncertainty,
spellingShingle statistical process control
control charts
robust design
model uncertainty,
Lee, Hyun Cheol
Robust design of control charts for autocorrelated processes with model uncertainty
description Statistical process control (SPC) procedures suitable for autocorrelated processes have been extensively investigated in recent years. The most popular method is the residual-based control chart. To implement this method, a time series model, which is usually an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model, of the process is required. However, the model must be estimated from data in practice and the resulting ARMA modeling errors are unavoidable. Residual-based control charts are known to be sensitive to ARMA modeling errors and often suffer from inflated false alarm rates. As an alternative, control charts can be applied directly to the autocorrelated data with widened control limits. The widened amount is determined by the autocorrelation function of the process. The alternative method, however, can not be also free from the effects of modeling errors because it relies on an accurate process model to be effective. To compare robustness to the ARMA modeling errors between the preceding two kinds of methods for control charting autocorrelated data, this dissertation investigates the sensitivity analytically. Then, two robust design procedures for residual-based control charts are developed from the result of the sensitivity analysis. The first approach for robust design uses the worst-case (maximum) variance of a chart statistic to guarantee the initial specification of control charts. The second robust design method uses the expected variance of the chart statistic. The resulting control limits are widened by an amount that depends on the variance of chart statistic - maximum or expected - as a function of (among other things) the parameter estimation error covariances.
author2 Apley, Daniel W.
author_facet Apley, Daniel W.
Lee, Hyun Cheol
author Lee, Hyun Cheol
author_sort Lee, Hyun Cheol
title Robust design of control charts for autocorrelated processes with model uncertainty
title_short Robust design of control charts for autocorrelated processes with model uncertainty
title_full Robust design of control charts for autocorrelated processes with model uncertainty
title_fullStr Robust design of control charts for autocorrelated processes with model uncertainty
title_full_unstemmed Robust design of control charts for autocorrelated processes with model uncertainty
title_sort robust design of control charts for autocorrelated processes with model uncertainty
publisher Texas A&M University
publishDate 2005
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/2778
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyuncheol robustdesignofcontrolchartsforautocorrelatedprocesseswithmodeluncertainty
_version_ 1716503217269899264