Landowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two Texas watersheds

With the expanding population of Texas and the resulting increase in demand for water, the scarcity of water is becoming an increasingly urgent issue and research is being conducted to find ways to improve water yield, the amount of water that is used for aquifer recharge and riparian areas (lakes,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Narayanan, Christopher Ram
Other Authors: Kreuter, Urs P.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Texas A&M University 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/1295
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-1295
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-12952013-01-08T10:37:33ZLandowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two Texas watershedsNarayanan, Christopher Rambrush managementwater yieldcos-sharesurveyWith the expanding population of Texas and the resulting increase in demand for water, the scarcity of water is becoming an increasingly urgent issue and research is being conducted to find ways to improve water yield, the amount of water that is used for aquifer recharge and riparian areas (lakes, streams, etc). Rangelands provide a major catchment for both surface reservoirs and aquifers. The Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone and the Twin Buttes Drainage Area were selected to determine the tradeoffs between brush management for increased water yield and wildlife habitat improvement. In April 2002, a mail survey of 300 randomly selected landowners was conducted in each of the two watersheds to gain information regarding their demographics, land cover, and willingness to enter into a cost-share brush removal program. A total of 131 usable questionnaires (43.7%) were returned by Edwards Aquifer area participants, and 141 usable questionnaires (47.0%) were returned by Twin Buttes area participants. Respondents were asked questions including attitudes towards brush amounts and management strategies, and certain constraints that may be included in a cost-share brush removal program. Most respondents indicated interest in enrolling at least part of their land in such a program. Reasoning behind interest varied in each study area. However, interest in various contractual agreements was neutral at best. Policy implications entail considering wildlife habitat mitigation, landowners' preferences, and potential for increasing water yield and determining if all can be managed, or if trade-offs must be considered.Texas A&M UniversityKreuter, Urs P.2004-11-15T19:54:15Z2004-11-15T19:54:15Z2003-082004-11-15T19:54:15ZBookThesisElectronic Thesistext797404 bytes137877 byteselectronicapplication/pdftext/plainborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/1295en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic brush management
water yield
cos-share
survey
spellingShingle brush management
water yield
cos-share
survey
Narayanan, Christopher Ram
Landowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two Texas watersheds
description With the expanding population of Texas and the resulting increase in demand for water, the scarcity of water is becoming an increasingly urgent issue and research is being conducted to find ways to improve water yield, the amount of water that is used for aquifer recharge and riparian areas (lakes, streams, etc). Rangelands provide a major catchment for both surface reservoirs and aquifers. The Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone and the Twin Buttes Drainage Area were selected to determine the tradeoffs between brush management for increased water yield and wildlife habitat improvement. In April 2002, a mail survey of 300 randomly selected landowners was conducted in each of the two watersheds to gain information regarding their demographics, land cover, and willingness to enter into a cost-share brush removal program. A total of 131 usable questionnaires (43.7%) were returned by Edwards Aquifer area participants, and 141 usable questionnaires (47.0%) were returned by Twin Buttes area participants. Respondents were asked questions including attitudes towards brush amounts and management strategies, and certain constraints that may be included in a cost-share brush removal program. Most respondents indicated interest in enrolling at least part of their land in such a program. Reasoning behind interest varied in each study area. However, interest in various contractual agreements was neutral at best. Policy implications entail considering wildlife habitat mitigation, landowners' preferences, and potential for increasing water yield and determining if all can be managed, or if trade-offs must be considered.
author2 Kreuter, Urs P.
author_facet Kreuter, Urs P.
Narayanan, Christopher Ram
author Narayanan, Christopher Ram
author_sort Narayanan, Christopher Ram
title Landowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two Texas watersheds
title_short Landowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two Texas watersheds
title_full Landowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two Texas watersheds
title_fullStr Landowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two Texas watersheds
title_full_unstemmed Landowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two Texas watersheds
title_sort landowner survey of a cost-share brush management program in two texas watersheds
publisher Texas A&M University
publishDate 2004
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/1295
work_keys_str_mv AT narayananchristopherram landownersurveyofacostsharebrushmanagementprogramintwotexaswatersheds
_version_ 1716502742083567616