Determining Reliability Of The PEAK Assessment Tool Using Split Half Reliability

The present study looked at the internal reliability of the PEAK Relational Training Assessment, using a split-half method of measurement. The reliability of the assessment questions within each of the four factors, within the PEAK Relational Training Assessment was estimated through this process....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mason, Haley Alissa
Format: Others
Published: OpenSIUC 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/1789
https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2803&context=theses
id ndltd-siu.edu-oai-opensiuc.lib.siu.edu-theses-2803
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-siu.edu-oai-opensiuc.lib.siu.edu-theses-28032018-12-20T04:35:15Z Determining Reliability Of The PEAK Assessment Tool Using Split Half Reliability Mason, Haley Alissa The present study looked at the internal reliability of the PEAK Relational Training Assessment, using a split-half method of measurement. The reliability of the assessment questions within each of the four factors, within the PEAK Relational Training Assessment was estimated through this process. Eighteen participants, between the ages of 26 months and ten years old were included in the study. All participants had been diagnosed with either a language based or developmental disability, including autism, seizure disorder, Down syndrome and related language disorders. The PEAK Relational Training Assessment (PEAK-D) was administered by a direct-care provider for each of the 18 participants and during standard instructional periods. Results indicate that for each of the 18 participants, there was a strong correlation between scores when one half of the items in each factor were compared to the remaining half. Results did show internal reliability for the PEAK-D when using split-half methodology. 2015-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/1789 https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2803&context=theses Theses OpenSIUC PEAK Assessment psychometrics split-half
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic PEAK Assessment
psychometrics
split-half
spellingShingle PEAK Assessment
psychometrics
split-half
Mason, Haley Alissa
Determining Reliability Of The PEAK Assessment Tool Using Split Half Reliability
description The present study looked at the internal reliability of the PEAK Relational Training Assessment, using a split-half method of measurement. The reliability of the assessment questions within each of the four factors, within the PEAK Relational Training Assessment was estimated through this process. Eighteen participants, between the ages of 26 months and ten years old were included in the study. All participants had been diagnosed with either a language based or developmental disability, including autism, seizure disorder, Down syndrome and related language disorders. The PEAK Relational Training Assessment (PEAK-D) was administered by a direct-care provider for each of the 18 participants and during standard instructional periods. Results indicate that for each of the 18 participants, there was a strong correlation between scores when one half of the items in each factor were compared to the remaining half. Results did show internal reliability for the PEAK-D when using split-half methodology.
author Mason, Haley Alissa
author_facet Mason, Haley Alissa
author_sort Mason, Haley Alissa
title Determining Reliability Of The PEAK Assessment Tool Using Split Half Reliability
title_short Determining Reliability Of The PEAK Assessment Tool Using Split Half Reliability
title_full Determining Reliability Of The PEAK Assessment Tool Using Split Half Reliability
title_fullStr Determining Reliability Of The PEAK Assessment Tool Using Split Half Reliability
title_full_unstemmed Determining Reliability Of The PEAK Assessment Tool Using Split Half Reliability
title_sort determining reliability of the peak assessment tool using split half reliability
publisher OpenSIUC
publishDate 2015
url https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/1789
https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2803&context=theses
work_keys_str_mv AT masonhaleyalissa determiningreliabilityofthepeakassessmenttoolusingsplithalfreliability
_version_ 1718803045271207936