THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

Identification of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD) in adults using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) T-scores was investigated. Archival data from closed client files at a university counseling center were used to obtain information from 91 cases of individuals who received...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DeLong, Dana M.
Format: Others
Published: OpenSIUC 2008
Subjects:
PAI
Online Access:https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/273
https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=dissertations
id ndltd-siu.edu-oai-opensiuc.lib.siu.edu-dissertations-1273
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-siu.edu-oai-opensiuc.lib.siu.edu-dissertations-12732018-12-20T04:28:31Z THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY DeLong, Dana M. Identification of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD) in adults using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) T-scores was investigated. Archival data from closed client files at a university counseling center were used to obtain information from 91 cases of individuals who received testing services and were diagnosed with AD/HD and 91 cases that received personal counseling and received a DSM-IV diagnosis but not a diagnosis of AD/HD. All cases had taken the PAI as part of the intake process. Four groups were identified; three AD/HD groups (Inattentive type, Combined type, & Not otherwise Specified) and a control group of counseling cases without an AD/HD diagnosis. The AD/HD-NOS group was excluded from the study due to the small group size of six. A MANOVA resulted in significance differences between the AD/HD-I and AD/HD-C groups; therefore, they were analyzed as separate groups. A MANOVA comparing the AD/HD groups and the control group revealed significance differences using select PAI clinical scales hypothesized to capture AD/HD symptoms. Descriptive and predictive discriminant function analyses (DFA) with a set of PAI subscales hypothesized to most relate to adult symptoms of AD/HD were significant, with modest results. DFA revealed a hit rate of 71.4% for prediction of clients with AD/HD-I; 30.8% for predicting AD/HD-C, and 78.9% predicting no AD/HD. Cut-off scores for AD/HD were suggested for four PAI scales. Strengths and limitations were discussed. 2008-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/273 https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=dissertations Dissertations OpenSIUC ADHD Adult Clinical PAI Screening Therapy
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic ADHD
Adult
Clinical
PAI
Screening
Therapy
spellingShingle ADHD
Adult
Clinical
PAI
Screening
Therapy
DeLong, Dana M.
THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY
description Identification of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD) in adults using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) T-scores was investigated. Archival data from closed client files at a university counseling center were used to obtain information from 91 cases of individuals who received testing services and were diagnosed with AD/HD and 91 cases that received personal counseling and received a DSM-IV diagnosis but not a diagnosis of AD/HD. All cases had taken the PAI as part of the intake process. Four groups were identified; three AD/HD groups (Inattentive type, Combined type, & Not otherwise Specified) and a control group of counseling cases without an AD/HD diagnosis. The AD/HD-NOS group was excluded from the study due to the small group size of six. A MANOVA resulted in significance differences between the AD/HD-I and AD/HD-C groups; therefore, they were analyzed as separate groups. A MANOVA comparing the AD/HD groups and the control group revealed significance differences using select PAI clinical scales hypothesized to capture AD/HD symptoms. Descriptive and predictive discriminant function analyses (DFA) with a set of PAI subscales hypothesized to most relate to adult symptoms of AD/HD were significant, with modest results. DFA revealed a hit rate of 71.4% for prediction of clients with AD/HD-I; 30.8% for predicting AD/HD-C, and 78.9% predicting no AD/HD. Cut-off scores for AD/HD were suggested for four PAI scales. Strengths and limitations were discussed.
author DeLong, Dana M.
author_facet DeLong, Dana M.
author_sort DeLong, Dana M.
title THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY
title_short THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY
title_full THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY
title_fullStr THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY
title_full_unstemmed THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY
title_sort utility of the personality assessment inventory
publisher OpenSIUC
publishDate 2008
url https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/273
https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=dissertations
work_keys_str_mv AT delongdanam theutilityofthepersonalityassessmentinventory
AT delongdanam utilityofthepersonalityassessmentinventory
_version_ 1718802234792214528