THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY
Identification of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD) in adults using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) T-scores was investigated. Archival data from closed client files at a university counseling center were used to obtain information from 91 cases of individuals who received...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
OpenSIUC
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/273 https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=dissertations |
id |
ndltd-siu.edu-oai-opensiuc.lib.siu.edu-dissertations-1273 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-siu.edu-oai-opensiuc.lib.siu.edu-dissertations-12732018-12-20T04:28:31Z THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY DeLong, Dana M. Identification of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD) in adults using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) T-scores was investigated. Archival data from closed client files at a university counseling center were used to obtain information from 91 cases of individuals who received testing services and were diagnosed with AD/HD and 91 cases that received personal counseling and received a DSM-IV diagnosis but not a diagnosis of AD/HD. All cases had taken the PAI as part of the intake process. Four groups were identified; three AD/HD groups (Inattentive type, Combined type, & Not otherwise Specified) and a control group of counseling cases without an AD/HD diagnosis. The AD/HD-NOS group was excluded from the study due to the small group size of six. A MANOVA resulted in significance differences between the AD/HD-I and AD/HD-C groups; therefore, they were analyzed as separate groups. A MANOVA comparing the AD/HD groups and the control group revealed significance differences using select PAI clinical scales hypothesized to capture AD/HD symptoms. Descriptive and predictive discriminant function analyses (DFA) with a set of PAI subscales hypothesized to most relate to adult symptoms of AD/HD were significant, with modest results. DFA revealed a hit rate of 71.4% for prediction of clients with AD/HD-I; 30.8% for predicting AD/HD-C, and 78.9% predicting no AD/HD. Cut-off scores for AD/HD were suggested for four PAI scales. Strengths and limitations were discussed. 2008-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/273 https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=dissertations Dissertations OpenSIUC ADHD Adult Clinical PAI Screening Therapy |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
ADHD Adult Clinical PAI Screening Therapy |
spellingShingle |
ADHD Adult Clinical PAI Screening Therapy DeLong, Dana M. THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY |
description |
Identification of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD) in adults using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) T-scores was investigated. Archival data from closed client files at a university counseling center were used to obtain information from 91 cases of individuals who received testing services and were diagnosed with AD/HD and 91 cases that received personal counseling and received a DSM-IV diagnosis but not a diagnosis of AD/HD. All cases had taken the PAI as part of the intake process. Four groups were identified; three AD/HD groups (Inattentive type, Combined type, & Not otherwise Specified) and a control group of counseling cases without an AD/HD diagnosis. The AD/HD-NOS group was excluded from the study due to the small group size of six. A MANOVA resulted in significance differences between the AD/HD-I and AD/HD-C groups; therefore, they were analyzed as separate groups. A MANOVA comparing the AD/HD groups and the control group revealed significance differences using select PAI clinical scales hypothesized to capture AD/HD symptoms. Descriptive and predictive discriminant function analyses (DFA) with a set of PAI subscales hypothesized to most relate to adult symptoms of AD/HD were significant, with modest results. DFA revealed a hit rate of 71.4% for prediction of clients with AD/HD-I; 30.8% for predicting AD/HD-C, and 78.9% predicting no AD/HD. Cut-off scores for AD/HD were suggested for four PAI scales. Strengths and limitations were discussed. |
author |
DeLong, Dana M. |
author_facet |
DeLong, Dana M. |
author_sort |
DeLong, Dana M. |
title |
THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY |
title_short |
THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY |
title_full |
THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY |
title_fullStr |
THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE UTILITY OF THE PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT INVENTORY |
title_sort |
utility of the personality assessment inventory |
publisher |
OpenSIUC |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/273 https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=dissertations |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT delongdanam theutilityofthepersonalityassessmentinventory AT delongdanam utilityofthepersonalityassessmentinventory |
_version_ |
1718802234792214528 |