Is Scholarship Advancing?: An Analysis of Fifteen Years of Framing Research

In 2011, Porismita Borah published "Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade’s Literature" to shed light on the status of framing research, and attempt to answer several scholars' criticisms of framing research practices (Carragee and Roefs 2004, D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Provencher, Joseph Zachary
Format: Others
Published: PDXScholar 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/2705
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3710&context=open_access_etds
id ndltd-pdx.edu-oai-pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu-open_access_etds-3710
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-pdx.edu-oai-pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu-open_access_etds-37102019-10-20T04:43:04Z Is Scholarship Advancing?: An Analysis of Fifteen Years of Framing Research Provencher, Joseph Zachary In 2011, Porismita Borah published "Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade’s Literature" to shed light on the status of framing research, and attempt to answer several scholars' criticisms of framing research practices (Carragee and Roefs 2004, D'Angelo, 2002, Entman, 1993). Borah argues that framing research has several areas of necessary improvement, and her prescription is for future research to be able to examine specific framing issues or effects, but also be able to connect with broader understandings of framing. The following content analysis of framing research, conducted between the year 2000 and 2013, seeks to examine the current state of framing literature, and whether or not scholarship is advancing optimally. The hope is to examine partially if Borah's concerns remain relevant to current framing research. Additionally, the current study seeks to expand the questions asked of framing research in multiple ways. What follows is an account of framing, as a theory broadly. Borah's role in attempting to measure the state of framing research is explained, and then I show how research can be expanded in several areas to be more inclusive. Then, new avenues of inquiry will be opened, particularly in regard to power, and social relationships, to delve deeper into whether or not framing research can be improved in terms of accuracy and efficacy. Following those sections is an explanation of the way my research questions have been operationalized, an account of the methodology employed by this study, our findings, and a discussion of the data and it’s meaningful portions. 2016-03-11T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/2705 https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3710&context=open_access_etds Dissertations and Theses PDXScholar Frames (Sociology) -- Research Communication Speech and Rhetorical Studies
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Frames (Sociology) -- Research
Communication
Speech and Rhetorical Studies
spellingShingle Frames (Sociology) -- Research
Communication
Speech and Rhetorical Studies
Provencher, Joseph Zachary
Is Scholarship Advancing?: An Analysis of Fifteen Years of Framing Research
description In 2011, Porismita Borah published "Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade’s Literature" to shed light on the status of framing research, and attempt to answer several scholars' criticisms of framing research practices (Carragee and Roefs 2004, D'Angelo, 2002, Entman, 1993). Borah argues that framing research has several areas of necessary improvement, and her prescription is for future research to be able to examine specific framing issues or effects, but also be able to connect with broader understandings of framing. The following content analysis of framing research, conducted between the year 2000 and 2013, seeks to examine the current state of framing literature, and whether or not scholarship is advancing optimally. The hope is to examine partially if Borah's concerns remain relevant to current framing research. Additionally, the current study seeks to expand the questions asked of framing research in multiple ways. What follows is an account of framing, as a theory broadly. Borah's role in attempting to measure the state of framing research is explained, and then I show how research can be expanded in several areas to be more inclusive. Then, new avenues of inquiry will be opened, particularly in regard to power, and social relationships, to delve deeper into whether or not framing research can be improved in terms of accuracy and efficacy. Following those sections is an explanation of the way my research questions have been operationalized, an account of the methodology employed by this study, our findings, and a discussion of the data and it’s meaningful portions.
author Provencher, Joseph Zachary
author_facet Provencher, Joseph Zachary
author_sort Provencher, Joseph Zachary
title Is Scholarship Advancing?: An Analysis of Fifteen Years of Framing Research
title_short Is Scholarship Advancing?: An Analysis of Fifteen Years of Framing Research
title_full Is Scholarship Advancing?: An Analysis of Fifteen Years of Framing Research
title_fullStr Is Scholarship Advancing?: An Analysis of Fifteen Years of Framing Research
title_full_unstemmed Is Scholarship Advancing?: An Analysis of Fifteen Years of Framing Research
title_sort is scholarship advancing?: an analysis of fifteen years of framing research
publisher PDXScholar
publishDate 2016
url https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/2705
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3710&context=open_access_etds
work_keys_str_mv AT provencherjosephzachary isscholarshipadvancingananalysisoffifteenyearsofframingresearch
_version_ 1719271833061031936