The utility of philately in comparative education and the analysis of higher education systems
Philately is an original source which has been unexamined as a research tool in comparative education. This study investigated the possibility of formulating ideas and concepts about higher education by developing case studies on Japan, Kenya and the USSR. Each case study compared the interpretation...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Scholarly Commons
1998
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/2577 https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3576&context=uop_etds |
id |
ndltd-pacific.edu-oai-scholarlycommons.pacific.edu-uop_etds-3576 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-pacific.edu-oai-scholarlycommons.pacific.edu-uop_etds-35762021-08-24T05:14:47Z The utility of philately in comparative education and the analysis of higher education systems Luff, Debra Jean Philately is an original source which has been unexamined as a research tool in comparative education. This study investigated the possibility of formulating ideas and concepts about higher education by developing case studies on Japan, Kenya and the USSR. Each case study compared the interpretation of the postage stamps and dedications issued with an analysis of comparative education literature. Wilson's comparative education framework was used to assess the thoroughness of each approach. The comparative education journals used in this research included: Comparative Education Review (1957 to present), Comparative Education (1964 to present), and the International Review of Education (1955 to present). The analysis of philately required developing useful questions as a heuristic device. The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Cognitive Domain (Bloom, 1956) was used to devise sample questions which extended the comparative education literature in useful ways. The philatelic questions formed a link between the comparative education literature and International Education which enhanced both fields. Philatelic analysis highlighted culturally important events useful for both comparative education and international education. It is appropriate to note that Wilson's categories of national characteristics and socializing agents was expanded by this research to include a country's traditional values (Japan), sought values (Kenya) and propaganda (USSR). The case studies indicated new ways to examine comparative education through Wilson's framework and established the value of philately as a research tool for comparative education researchers. 1998-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/2577 https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3576&context=uop_etds University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations Scholarly Commons Higher education Education Comparative education Higher education Japan Kenya Philately Soviet union |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Higher education Education Comparative education Higher education Japan Kenya Philately Soviet union |
spellingShingle |
Higher education Education Comparative education Higher education Japan Kenya Philately Soviet union Luff, Debra Jean The utility of philately in comparative education and the analysis of higher education systems |
description |
Philately is an original source which has been unexamined as a research tool in comparative education. This study investigated the possibility of formulating ideas and concepts about higher education by developing case studies on Japan, Kenya and the USSR. Each case study compared the interpretation of the postage stamps and dedications issued with an analysis of comparative education literature. Wilson's comparative education framework was used to assess the thoroughness of each approach. The comparative education journals used in this research included: Comparative Education Review (1957 to present), Comparative Education (1964 to present), and the International Review of Education (1955 to present). The analysis of philately required developing useful questions as a heuristic device. The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Cognitive Domain (Bloom, 1956) was used to devise sample questions which extended the comparative education literature in useful ways. The philatelic questions formed a link between the comparative education literature and International Education which enhanced both fields. Philatelic analysis highlighted culturally important events useful for both comparative education and international education. It is appropriate to note that Wilson's categories of national characteristics and socializing agents was expanded by this research to include a country's traditional values (Japan), sought values (Kenya) and propaganda (USSR). The case studies indicated new ways to examine comparative education through Wilson's framework and established the value of philately as a research tool for comparative education researchers. |
author |
Luff, Debra Jean |
author_facet |
Luff, Debra Jean |
author_sort |
Luff, Debra Jean |
title |
The utility of philately in comparative education and the analysis of higher education systems |
title_short |
The utility of philately in comparative education and the analysis of higher education systems |
title_full |
The utility of philately in comparative education and the analysis of higher education systems |
title_fullStr |
The utility of philately in comparative education and the analysis of higher education systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
The utility of philately in comparative education and the analysis of higher education systems |
title_sort |
utility of philately in comparative education and the analysis of higher education systems |
publisher |
Scholarly Commons |
publishDate |
1998 |
url |
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/2577 https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3576&context=uop_etds |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT luffdebrajean theutilityofphilatelyincomparativeeducationandtheanalysisofhighereducationsystems AT luffdebrajean utilityofphilatelyincomparativeeducationandtheanalysisofhighereducationsystems |
_version_ |
1719471938506588160 |