Self-monitoring and self-reinforcement applied to junior college study behavior

Although previous research has shown the efficacy of self-control techniques such as self-monitoring and self-reinforcement in changing study behavior, the adequacy of the experimental procedures utilized in many studies may be questioned. This experiment re-examined the effects these operant condit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cesa, Thomas A.
Format: Others
Published: Scholarly Commons 1974
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/1833
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2832&context=uop_etds
id ndltd-pacific.edu-oai-scholarlycommons.pacific.edu-uop_etds-2832
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-pacific.edu-oai-scholarlycommons.pacific.edu-uop_etds-28322021-09-01T05:17:05Z Self-monitoring and self-reinforcement applied to junior college study behavior Cesa, Thomas A. Although previous research has shown the efficacy of self-control techniques such as self-monitoring and self-reinforcement in changing study behavior, the adequacy of the experimental procedures utilized in many studies may be questioned. This experiment re-examined the effects these operant conditioning procedures had on the study behavior of junior college evening students by using three groups of subjects exposed to different combinations of self-control techniques. Control Group subjects recorded their new thoughts (ideas relating the course material to their everyday lives) in an attempt to control for the effects of novel procedures, motivation and other non-specific variables. Self-Monitoring Group subjects complied with the control procedure, monitored their study time {by recording study start and stop times) and monitored the number of facts learned (by self-administering quizzes). The Self-Reinforcement Group complied with the self-monitoring procedures and self-reinforced their study behavior (by listing their reinforcers, the cost per reinforcer in minutes of study time and recording the number of reinforcements received). Additional data collected consisted of concurrent weekly quiz scores, final examination scores and the extent to which subjects complied with the treatment procedures. Results showed no significant differences among the three groups on either concurrent quizzes or on the final examination. The Self-! 1974-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/1833 https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2832&context=uop_etds University of the Pacific Theses and Dissertations Scholarly Commons Operant conditioning Operant behavior Self-control Education Social and Behavioral Sciences
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Operant conditioning
Operant behavior
Self-control
Education
Social and Behavioral Sciences
spellingShingle Operant conditioning
Operant behavior
Self-control
Education
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Cesa, Thomas A.
Self-monitoring and self-reinforcement applied to junior college study behavior
description Although previous research has shown the efficacy of self-control techniques such as self-monitoring and self-reinforcement in changing study behavior, the adequacy of the experimental procedures utilized in many studies may be questioned. This experiment re-examined the effects these operant conditioning procedures had on the study behavior of junior college evening students by using three groups of subjects exposed to different combinations of self-control techniques. Control Group subjects recorded their new thoughts (ideas relating the course material to their everyday lives) in an attempt to control for the effects of novel procedures, motivation and other non-specific variables. Self-Monitoring Group subjects complied with the control procedure, monitored their study time {by recording study start and stop times) and monitored the number of facts learned (by self-administering quizzes). The Self-Reinforcement Group complied with the self-monitoring procedures and self-reinforced their study behavior (by listing their reinforcers, the cost per reinforcer in minutes of study time and recording the number of reinforcements received). Additional data collected consisted of concurrent weekly quiz scores, final examination scores and the extent to which subjects complied with the treatment procedures. Results showed no significant differences among the three groups on either concurrent quizzes or on the final examination. The Self-!
author Cesa, Thomas A.
author_facet Cesa, Thomas A.
author_sort Cesa, Thomas A.
title Self-monitoring and self-reinforcement applied to junior college study behavior
title_short Self-monitoring and self-reinforcement applied to junior college study behavior
title_full Self-monitoring and self-reinforcement applied to junior college study behavior
title_fullStr Self-monitoring and self-reinforcement applied to junior college study behavior
title_full_unstemmed Self-monitoring and self-reinforcement applied to junior college study behavior
title_sort self-monitoring and self-reinforcement applied to junior college study behavior
publisher Scholarly Commons
publishDate 1974
url https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uop_etds/1833
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2832&context=uop_etds
work_keys_str_mv AT cesathomasa selfmonitoringandselfreinforcementappliedtojuniorcollegestudybehavior
_version_ 1719473942319595520