Srovnání přínosu CT portů a běžných portových systémů u pacientů vyžadujících dlouhodobý žilní přístup a posouzení přínosu port systému v ambulantní praxi
Summary: Comparison of CT (power) and standard venous port systems in long-term central venous access in outpatients. The aim of our study was to evaluate benefit of use of portsystems during contrast enhanced CT examinations. We studied implantation of power port systems in short and middle time pe...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Doctoral Thesis |
| Language: | Czech |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Online Access: | http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-338494 |
| Summary: | Summary: Comparison of CT (power) and standard venous port systems in long-term central venous access in outpatients. The aim of our study was to evaluate benefit of use of portsystems during contrast enhanced CT examinations. We studied implantation of power port systems in short and middle time period and also compared the procedure to literature informations. We also studied benefit of power port implantation procedure done under sonographic and fluoroscopic navigation. Materials and methods: There were collected patients of two cooperating departments of interventional radiology. All our patients included in the study had implanted power port systems, the procedure was done by sonographic and fluoroscopic control. We studied periprocedural and late complications of the procedure. We also studied benefit of the power port for contrast enhanced CT follow up during oncologic therapy and frequency of port using by medical staff. We studied perception of implanted power port in our patients in their daily life. Results: The primary technical success of the procedure was 100 % and we had no postprocedural pneumothorax observed. The technique of implantation of ports and power ports is the same. The average follow up in our study is 291,5 days (2-294 days). Five patients died in follow up period 2-594 days.... |
|---|