Knapsack cuts and explicit-constraint branching for solving integer programs

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === Enhanced solution techniques are developed for solving integer programs (IPs) and mixed-integer programs (MIPs). Previously unsolvable problems can be solved with these new techniques. We develop knapsack cut-finding procedures for minimal c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Appleget, Jeffrey A.
Other Authors: Wood, R. Kevin
Language:en_US
Published: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/8601
Description
Summary:Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === Enhanced solution techniques are developed for solving integer programs (IPs) and mixed-integer programs (MIPs). Previously unsolvable problems can be solved with these new techniques. We develop knapsack cut-finding procedures for minimal cover cuts, and convert existing cut-strengthening theory into practical procedures that lift and tighten violated minimal cover valid inequalities to violated knapsack facets in polynomial time. We find a new class of knapsack cuts called 'non-minimal cover cuts' and a method of lifting them called 'deficit lifting.' Deficit lifting enables all of these cuts to be lifted and tightened to facets as well. Extensions of these techniques enable us to find cuts for elastic knapsack constraints and cuts for non-standard knapsack constraints. We also develop the new technique of 'explicit-constraint branching' (ECB). ECB enables the technique of constraint branching to be used on IPs and MIPs that do not have the structure required for known 'implicit constraint branching' techniques. When these techniques are applied to 84 randomly generated generalized assignment problems, the combination of knapsack cuts and explicit-constraint branching were able to solve 100% of the problems in under 1000 CPU seconds. Explicit constraint branching alone solved 94%, and knapsack cuts solved 93%. Standard branch and bound alone solved only 38%. The benefits of these techniques are also demonstrated on some real-world generalized assignment and set-partitioning problems