Selective offload capability simulation (SOCS) : an analysis of high-density storage configurations
Approved for public release; distribution in unlimited. === Future sea bases, such as the Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future), will serve as key distribution nodes and must be able to sustain forces ashore and selectively offload supplies from storerooms quickly and efficiently. Current MPF ships...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10945/849 |
id |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-849 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-8492017-05-24T16:06:35Z Selective offload capability simulation (SOCS) : an analysis of high-density storage configurations Futcher, Frank W. Gue, Kevin R. Operations Research Stowage Military supplies Storage Logistics Selective Offload Stowage and Retrieval High-Density Stowage Very High Density Storage Systems Sea Basing Storage Configurations Storage Density Sea-Based Logistics (SBL) Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) Future (MPF(F)) Sustainment Sea Base Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (AS/RS) Approved for public release; distribution in unlimited. Future sea bases, such as the Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future), will serve as key distribution nodes and must be able to sustain forces ashore and selectively offload supplies from storerooms quickly and efficiently. Current MPF ships maximize the available cargo storage onboard and have little ability to selectively offload supplies. To make selective offload a reality, MPF(F) requires lower stowage densities and new technologies to efficiently move items, especially for those supplies needed in direct support of forces ashore. The difficult questions are how dense and in what configurations MPF(F) storerooms can be packed, and how items should be retrieved in order to selectively offload supplies and provide acceptable response time. We analyze the trade-off between storage density and mean retrieval time in a dynamic environment for different storage densities and configurations in notional storerooms aboard a future sea base. We examine two demand scenarios and two different retrieval rules to determine how each storage configuration responds to retrieval requests over time. Our results provide insight into the types of storeroom configurations that provide the best mean retrieval times and how a simple retrieval rule can significantly reduce mean retrieval time under certain demand conditions. Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy 2012-03-14T17:29:38Z 2012-03-14T17:29:38Z 2003-09 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/849 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. xxii, 87 p. : ill., maps (some col.) ; application/pdf Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Stowage Military supplies Storage Logistics Selective Offload Stowage and Retrieval High-Density Stowage Very High Density Storage Systems Sea Basing Storage Configurations Storage Density Sea-Based Logistics (SBL) Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) Future (MPF(F)) Sustainment Sea Base Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (AS/RS) |
spellingShingle |
Stowage Military supplies Storage Logistics Selective Offload Stowage and Retrieval High-Density Stowage Very High Density Storage Systems Sea Basing Storage Configurations Storage Density Sea-Based Logistics (SBL) Maritime Prepositioning Force (MPF) Future (MPF(F)) Sustainment Sea Base Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (AS/RS) Futcher, Frank W. Selective offload capability simulation (SOCS) : an analysis of high-density storage configurations |
description |
Approved for public release; distribution in unlimited. === Future sea bases, such as the Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future), will serve as key distribution nodes and must be able to sustain forces ashore and selectively offload supplies from storerooms quickly and efficiently. Current MPF ships maximize the available cargo storage onboard and have little ability to selectively offload supplies. To make selective offload a reality, MPF(F) requires lower stowage densities and new technologies to efficiently move items, especially for those supplies needed in direct support of forces ashore. The difficult questions are how dense and in what configurations MPF(F) storerooms can be packed, and how items should be retrieved in order to selectively offload supplies and provide acceptable response time. We analyze the trade-off between storage density and mean retrieval time in a dynamic environment for different storage densities and configurations in notional storerooms aboard a future sea base. We examine two demand scenarios and two different retrieval rules to determine how each storage configuration responds to retrieval requests over time. Our results provide insight into the types of storeroom configurations that provide the best mean retrieval times and how a simple retrieval rule can significantly reduce mean retrieval time under certain demand conditions. === Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy |
author2 |
Gue, Kevin R. |
author_facet |
Gue, Kevin R. Futcher, Frank W. |
author |
Futcher, Frank W. |
author_sort |
Futcher, Frank W. |
title |
Selective offload capability simulation (SOCS) : an analysis of high-density storage configurations |
title_short |
Selective offload capability simulation (SOCS) : an analysis of high-density storage configurations |
title_full |
Selective offload capability simulation (SOCS) : an analysis of high-density storage configurations |
title_fullStr |
Selective offload capability simulation (SOCS) : an analysis of high-density storage configurations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Selective offload capability simulation (SOCS) : an analysis of high-density storage configurations |
title_sort |
selective offload capability simulation (socs) : an analysis of high-density storage configurations |
publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/849 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT futcherfrankw selectiveoffloadcapabilitysimulationsocsananalysisofhighdensitystorageconfigurations |
_version_ |
1718452447845810176 |