Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics

Includes supplementary material. === Recent conflicts such as Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom highlight the logistics difficulties the United States faces by relying on foreign access and infrastructure and large supply stockpiles ashore to support expeditionary operations....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bender, Amy, Cottle, Jacob, Craddock, Timothy, Dowd, Justin, Feese, Rick, Foster, Brett, Gainey, John, Jimenez, Ivan, Johnson, Brent, Johnson, Terry, Lemmon, John, Levendofske, Michael, Liskey, Dale, Oliphant, Anthony, Olvera, Daniel, Partington, William, Peace, Steven, Tanks, Paul
Other Authors: Systems Engineering
Published: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/6918
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-6918
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-69182014-11-27T16:06:49Z Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics Bender, Amy Cottle, Jacob Craddock, Timothy Dowd, Justin Feese, Rick Foster, Brett Gainey, John Jimenez, Ivan Johnson, Brent Johnson, Terry Lemmon, John Levendofske, Michael Liskey, Dale Oliphant, Anthony Olvera, Daniel Partington, William Peace, Steven Tanks, Paul Systems Engineering Includes supplementary material. Recent conflicts such as Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom highlight the logistics difficulties the United States faces by relying on foreign access and infrastructure and large supply stockpiles ashore to support expeditionary operations. The Navy's transformational vision for the future, Sea Power 21, involves Seabasing as a way to address these difficulties by projecting and sustaining joint forces globally from the sea. This study analyzes logistics flow to, within and from a Sea Base to an objective, and the architectures and systems needed to rapidly deploy and sustain a brigade-size force. Utilizing the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), this study incorporates a systems engineering framework to examine current systems, programs of record and proposed systems out to the year 2025. Several capability gaps that hamper a brigade-size force from seizing the initiative anywhere in the world within a 10-day period point to a need for dedicated lift assets, such as high-speed surface ships or lighter-than-air ships, to facilitate the rapid formation of the Sea Base. Additionally, the study identifies the need for large-payload/high-speed or load-once/direct-to- objective connector capabilities to minimize the number of at-sea transfers required to employ such a force from the Sea Base in 10 hrs. With these gaps addressed, the Joint Expeditionary Brigade is supportable from the Sea Base. Recent conflicts such as Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom highlight the logistics difficulties the United States faces by relying on foreign access and infrastructure and large supply stockpiles ashore to support expeditionary operations. The Navy's transformational vision for the future, Sea Power 21, involves Seabasing as a way to address these difficulties by projecting and sustaining joint forces globally from the sea. This study analyzes logistics flow to, within and from a Sea Base to an objective, and the architectures and systems needed to rapidly deploy and sustain a brigade-size force. Utilizing the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), this study incorporates a systems engineering framework to examine current systems, programs of record and proposed systems out to the year 2025. Several capability gaps that hamper a brigade-size force from seizing the initiative anywhere in the world within a 10-day period point to a need for dedicated lift assets, such as high-speed surface ships or lighter-than-air ships, to facilitate the rapid formation of the Sea Base. Additionally, the study identifies the need for large-payload/high-speed or load-once/direct-to- objective connector capabilities to minimize the number of at-sea transfers required to employ such a force from the Sea Base in 10 hrs. With these gaps addressed, the Joint Expeditionary Brigade is supportable from the Sea Base. 2012-05-29T17:19:42Z 2012-05-29T17:19:42Z 2004-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/6918 NPS-97-05-001 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Includes supplementary material. === Recent conflicts such as Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom highlight the logistics difficulties the United States faces by relying on foreign access and infrastructure and large supply stockpiles ashore to support expeditionary operations. The Navy's transformational vision for the future, Sea Power 21, involves Seabasing as a way to address these difficulties by projecting and sustaining joint forces globally from the sea. This study analyzes logistics flow to, within and from a Sea Base to an objective, and the architectures and systems needed to rapidly deploy and sustain a brigade-size force. Utilizing the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), this study incorporates a systems engineering framework to examine current systems, programs of record and proposed systems out to the year 2025. Several capability gaps that hamper a brigade-size force from seizing the initiative anywhere in the world within a 10-day period point to a need for dedicated lift assets, such as high-speed surface ships or lighter-than-air ships, to facilitate the rapid formation of the Sea Base. Additionally, the study identifies the need for large-payload/high-speed or load-once/direct-to- objective connector capabilities to minimize the number of at-sea transfers required to employ such a force from the Sea Base in 10 hrs. With these gaps addressed, the Joint Expeditionary Brigade is supportable from the Sea Base. === Recent conflicts such as Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom highlight the logistics difficulties the United States faces by relying on foreign access and infrastructure and large supply stockpiles ashore to support expeditionary operations. The Navy's transformational vision for the future, Sea Power 21, involves Seabasing as a way to address these difficulties by projecting and sustaining joint forces globally from the sea. This study analyzes logistics flow to, within and from a Sea Base to an objective, and the architectures and systems needed to rapidly deploy and sustain a brigade-size force. Utilizing the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), this study incorporates a systems engineering framework to examine current systems, programs of record and proposed systems out to the year 2025. Several capability gaps that hamper a brigade-size force from seizing the initiative anywhere in the world within a 10-day period point to a need for dedicated lift assets, such as high-speed surface ships or lighter-than-air ships, to facilitate the rapid formation of the Sea Base. Additionally, the study identifies the need for large-payload/high-speed or load-once/direct-to- objective connector capabilities to minimize the number of at-sea transfers required to employ such a force from the Sea Base in 10 hrs. With these gaps addressed, the Joint Expeditionary Brigade is supportable from the Sea Base.
author2 Systems Engineering
author_facet Systems Engineering
Bender, Amy
Cottle, Jacob
Craddock, Timothy
Dowd, Justin
Feese, Rick
Foster, Brett
Gainey, John
Jimenez, Ivan
Johnson, Brent
Johnson, Terry
Lemmon, John
Levendofske, Michael
Liskey, Dale
Oliphant, Anthony
Olvera, Daniel
Partington, William
Peace, Steven
Tanks, Paul
author Bender, Amy
Cottle, Jacob
Craddock, Timothy
Dowd, Justin
Feese, Rick
Foster, Brett
Gainey, John
Jimenez, Ivan
Johnson, Brent
Johnson, Terry
Lemmon, John
Levendofske, Michael
Liskey, Dale
Oliphant, Anthony
Olvera, Daniel
Partington, William
Peace, Steven
Tanks, Paul
spellingShingle Bender, Amy
Cottle, Jacob
Craddock, Timothy
Dowd, Justin
Feese, Rick
Foster, Brett
Gainey, John
Jimenez, Ivan
Johnson, Brent
Johnson, Terry
Lemmon, John
Levendofske, Michael
Liskey, Dale
Oliphant, Anthony
Olvera, Daniel
Partington, William
Peace, Steven
Tanks, Paul
Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics
author_sort Bender, Amy
title Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics
title_short Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics
title_full Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics
title_fullStr Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics
title_full_unstemmed Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics
title_sort seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics
publisher Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/6918
work_keys_str_mv AT benderamy seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT cottlejacob seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT craddocktimothy seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT dowdjustin seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT feeserick seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT fosterbrett seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT gaineyjohn seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT jimenezivan seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT johnsonbrent seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT johnsonterry seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT lemmonjohn seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT levendofskemichael seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT liskeydale seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT oliphantanthony seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT olveradaniel seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT partingtonwilliam seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT peacesteven seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
AT tankspaul seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics
_version_ 1716721064625569792