Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics
Includes supplementary material. === Recent conflicts such as Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom highlight the logistics difficulties the United States faces by relying on foreign access and infrastructure and large supply stockpiles ashore to support expeditionary operations....
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Published: |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
2012
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10945/6918 |
id |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-6918 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-69182014-11-27T16:06:49Z Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics Bender, Amy Cottle, Jacob Craddock, Timothy Dowd, Justin Feese, Rick Foster, Brett Gainey, John Jimenez, Ivan Johnson, Brent Johnson, Terry Lemmon, John Levendofske, Michael Liskey, Dale Oliphant, Anthony Olvera, Daniel Partington, William Peace, Steven Tanks, Paul Systems Engineering Includes supplementary material. Recent conflicts such as Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom highlight the logistics difficulties the United States faces by relying on foreign access and infrastructure and large supply stockpiles ashore to support expeditionary operations. The Navy's transformational vision for the future, Sea Power 21, involves Seabasing as a way to address these difficulties by projecting and sustaining joint forces globally from the sea. This study analyzes logistics flow to, within and from a Sea Base to an objective, and the architectures and systems needed to rapidly deploy and sustain a brigade-size force. Utilizing the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), this study incorporates a systems engineering framework to examine current systems, programs of record and proposed systems out to the year 2025. Several capability gaps that hamper a brigade-size force from seizing the initiative anywhere in the world within a 10-day period point to a need for dedicated lift assets, such as high-speed surface ships or lighter-than-air ships, to facilitate the rapid formation of the Sea Base. Additionally, the study identifies the need for large-payload/high-speed or load-once/direct-to- objective connector capabilities to minimize the number of at-sea transfers required to employ such a force from the Sea Base in 10 hrs. With these gaps addressed, the Joint Expeditionary Brigade is supportable from the Sea Base. Recent conflicts such as Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom highlight the logistics difficulties the United States faces by relying on foreign access and infrastructure and large supply stockpiles ashore to support expeditionary operations. The Navy's transformational vision for the future, Sea Power 21, involves Seabasing as a way to address these difficulties by projecting and sustaining joint forces globally from the sea. This study analyzes logistics flow to, within and from a Sea Base to an objective, and the architectures and systems needed to rapidly deploy and sustain a brigade-size force. Utilizing the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), this study incorporates a systems engineering framework to examine current systems, programs of record and proposed systems out to the year 2025. Several capability gaps that hamper a brigade-size force from seizing the initiative anywhere in the world within a 10-day period point to a need for dedicated lift assets, such as high-speed surface ships or lighter-than-air ships, to facilitate the rapid formation of the Sea Base. Additionally, the study identifies the need for large-payload/high-speed or load-once/direct-to- objective connector capabilities to minimize the number of at-sea transfers required to employ such a force from the Sea Base in 10 hrs. With these gaps addressed, the Joint Expeditionary Brigade is supportable from the Sea Base. 2012-05-29T17:19:42Z 2012-05-29T17:19:42Z 2004-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/6918 NPS-97-05-001 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
collection |
NDLTD |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Includes supplementary material. === Recent conflicts such as Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom highlight the logistics difficulties the United States faces by relying on foreign access and infrastructure and large supply stockpiles ashore to support expeditionary operations. The Navy's transformational vision for the future, Sea Power 21, involves Seabasing as a way to address these difficulties by projecting and sustaining joint forces globally from the sea. This study analyzes logistics flow to, within and from a Sea Base to an objective, and the architectures and systems needed to rapidly deploy and sustain a brigade-size force. Utilizing the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), this study incorporates a systems engineering framework to examine current systems, programs of record and proposed systems out to the year 2025. Several capability gaps that hamper a brigade-size force from seizing the initiative anywhere in the world within a 10-day period point to a need for dedicated lift assets, such as high-speed surface ships or lighter-than-air ships, to facilitate the rapid formation of the Sea Base. Additionally, the study identifies the need for large-payload/high-speed or load-once/direct-to- objective connector capabilities to minimize the number of at-sea transfers required to employ such a force from the Sea Base in 10 hrs. With these gaps addressed, the Joint Expeditionary Brigade is supportable from the Sea Base. === Recent conflicts such as Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom highlight the logistics difficulties the United States faces by relying on foreign access and infrastructure and large supply stockpiles ashore to support expeditionary operations. The Navy's transformational vision for the future, Sea Power 21, involves Seabasing as a way to address these difficulties by projecting and sustaining joint forces globally from the sea. This study analyzes logistics flow to, within and from a Sea Base to an objective, and the architectures and systems needed to rapidly deploy and sustain a brigade-size force. Utilizing the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), this study incorporates a systems engineering framework to examine current systems, programs of record and proposed systems out to the year 2025. Several capability gaps that hamper a brigade-size force from seizing the initiative anywhere in the world within a 10-day period point to a need for dedicated lift assets, such as high-speed surface ships or lighter-than-air ships, to facilitate the rapid formation of the Sea Base. Additionally, the study identifies the need for large-payload/high-speed or load-once/direct-to- objective connector capabilities to minimize the number of at-sea transfers required to employ such a force from the Sea Base in 10 hrs. With these gaps addressed, the Joint Expeditionary Brigade is supportable from the Sea Base. |
author2 |
Systems Engineering |
author_facet |
Systems Engineering Bender, Amy Cottle, Jacob Craddock, Timothy Dowd, Justin Feese, Rick Foster, Brett Gainey, John Jimenez, Ivan Johnson, Brent Johnson, Terry Lemmon, John Levendofske, Michael Liskey, Dale Oliphant, Anthony Olvera, Daniel Partington, William Peace, Steven Tanks, Paul |
author |
Bender, Amy Cottle, Jacob Craddock, Timothy Dowd, Justin Feese, Rick Foster, Brett Gainey, John Jimenez, Ivan Johnson, Brent Johnson, Terry Lemmon, John Levendofske, Michael Liskey, Dale Oliphant, Anthony Olvera, Daniel Partington, William Peace, Steven Tanks, Paul |
spellingShingle |
Bender, Amy Cottle, Jacob Craddock, Timothy Dowd, Justin Feese, Rick Foster, Brett Gainey, John Jimenez, Ivan Johnson, Brent Johnson, Terry Lemmon, John Levendofske, Michael Liskey, Dale Oliphant, Anthony Olvera, Daniel Partington, William Peace, Steven Tanks, Paul Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics |
author_sort |
Bender, Amy |
title |
Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics |
title_short |
Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics |
title_full |
Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics |
title_fullStr |
Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics |
title_sort |
seabasing and joint expeditionary logistics |
publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/6918 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT benderamy seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT cottlejacob seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT craddocktimothy seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT dowdjustin seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT feeserick seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT fosterbrett seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT gaineyjohn seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT jimenezivan seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT johnsonbrent seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT johnsonterry seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT lemmonjohn seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT levendofskemichael seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT liskeydale seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT oliphantanthony seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT olveradaniel seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT partingtonwilliam seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT peacesteven seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics AT tankspaul seabasingandjointexpeditionarylogistics |
_version_ |
1716721064625569792 |