Did inequality increase in transition? : an analysis of the transitional countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia

Parallel to the process of democratization, the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia have shown an increase in measured income inequality during their transition from centrally-planned to a market-oriented economy. Since the behavior of these countries contradicted previous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: RoÌ zsaÌ s, TamaÌ s.
Other Authors: Henderson, David R.
Published: Monterey, Calif. Naval Postgraduate School 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5845
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-5845
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-58452014-11-27T16:06:13Z Did inequality increase in transition? : an analysis of the transitional countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia RoÌ zsaÌ s, TamaÌ s. Henderson, David R. McNab, Robert M. Parallel to the process of democratization, the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia have shown an increase in measured income inequality during their transition from centrally-planned to a market-oriented economy. Since the behavior of these countries contradicted previous models of inequality, researchers analyzing the transition process linked the increase in income inequality to the egalitarian values of socialism and to the process of economic and political liberalization. This thesis questions the validity of the above statement based on three pillars. First, other factors, from economic convulsions to the revaluation of natural resources, violent conflicts, corruption, and the expansion of organized crime, have been more closely linked than democratization to changes in income inequality. Second, data quality was generally poor in socialist countries, and extremely poor in several socialist countries, and have improved during the transition in most countries, usually without proper documentation of the changes. Finally, the analysis of the origins of today's income inequality shows that the magnitude and effect of hidden inequalities in the socialist past were highly underestimated. In short, an increase in income inequality caused by democratization is not likely, while hidden inequalities in the socialist era could even be higher than today's measured inequality. 2012-03-14T17:46:54Z 2012-03-14T17:46:54Z 2002-06 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5845 50910431 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. Monterey, Calif. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Parallel to the process of democratization, the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia have shown an increase in measured income inequality during their transition from centrally-planned to a market-oriented economy. Since the behavior of these countries contradicted previous models of inequality, researchers analyzing the transition process linked the increase in income inequality to the egalitarian values of socialism and to the process of economic and political liberalization. This thesis questions the validity of the above statement based on three pillars. First, other factors, from economic convulsions to the revaluation of natural resources, violent conflicts, corruption, and the expansion of organized crime, have been more closely linked than democratization to changes in income inequality. Second, data quality was generally poor in socialist countries, and extremely poor in several socialist countries, and have improved during the transition in most countries, usually without proper documentation of the changes. Finally, the analysis of the origins of today's income inequality shows that the magnitude and effect of hidden inequalities in the socialist past were highly underestimated. In short, an increase in income inequality caused by democratization is not likely, while hidden inequalities in the socialist era could even be higher than today's measured inequality.
author2 Henderson, David R.
author_facet Henderson, David R.
RoÌ zsaÌ s, TamaÌ s.
author RoÌ zsaÌ s, TamaÌ s.
spellingShingle RoÌ zsaÌ s, TamaÌ s.
Did inequality increase in transition? : an analysis of the transitional countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia
author_sort RoÌ zsaÌ s, TamaÌ s.
title Did inequality increase in transition? : an analysis of the transitional countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title_short Did inequality increase in transition? : an analysis of the transitional countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title_full Did inequality increase in transition? : an analysis of the transitional countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title_fullStr Did inequality increase in transition? : an analysis of the transitional countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title_full_unstemmed Did inequality increase in transition? : an analysis of the transitional countries of Eastern Europe and Central Asia
title_sort did inequality increase in transition? : an analysis of the transitional countries of eastern europe and central asia
publisher Monterey, Calif. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5845
work_keys_str_mv AT roizsaistamais didinequalityincreaseintransitionananalysisofthetransitionalcountriesofeasterneuropeandcentralasia
_version_ 1716721022270439424