The United States Army's multi-period optimal readiness allocation model

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. === The U.S. Army has undergone unprecedented change in the last decade, completing an organizational transformation and redesigning its deployment policies. These changes and other factors have resulted in an increase of 107% in equipping requ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Persons, Jay.
Other Authors: Salmeron, Javier
Published: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5668
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-5668
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-56682015-08-06T16:02:40Z The United States Army's multi-period optimal readiness allocation model Persons, Jay. Salmeron, Javier Ewing, P. Lee Dell, Robert. Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Operations Research Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The U.S. Army has undergone unprecedented change in the last decade, completing an organizational transformation and redesigning its deployment policies. These changes and other factors have resulted in an increase of 107% in equipping requirements between 2003 and 2011, forcing the Army to update its equipping policies. We develop the "multi-period optimal readiness allocation model" (MPORAM) to maximize unit equipment readiness across the force over several years. MPORAM extends an earlier single-period model to account for the dynamic nature of unit priorities, budget, and other factors that vary over the planning horizon. Using a small test case, we observe that MPORAM distributes and/or transfers equipment in anticipation of future demand needs. For example, if one unit cannot improve its readiness in one time period, MPORAM focuses on improving other units" ratings, if possible, regardless of their priorities. Using two realistically-sized cases, we observe that the multi-period solution does not differ notably from the single-period solution. Thus, we cannot make any strong conclusions about the added value of MPORAM in these cases. However, these results are strongly influenced by a large gap between supply and demand, and we expect MPORAM to improve the single-period solution in more balanced cases. 2012-03-14T17:46:20Z 2012-03-14T17:46:20Z 2011-06 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5668 743300815 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. === The U.S. Army has undergone unprecedented change in the last decade, completing an organizational transformation and redesigning its deployment policies. These changes and other factors have resulted in an increase of 107% in equipping requirements between 2003 and 2011, forcing the Army to update its equipping policies. We develop the "multi-period optimal readiness allocation model" (MPORAM) to maximize unit equipment readiness across the force over several years. MPORAM extends an earlier single-period model to account for the dynamic nature of unit priorities, budget, and other factors that vary over the planning horizon. Using a small test case, we observe that MPORAM distributes and/or transfers equipment in anticipation of future demand needs. For example, if one unit cannot improve its readiness in one time period, MPORAM focuses on improving other units" ratings, if possible, regardless of their priorities. Using two realistically-sized cases, we observe that the multi-period solution does not differ notably from the single-period solution. Thus, we cannot make any strong conclusions about the added value of MPORAM in these cases. However, these results are strongly influenced by a large gap between supply and demand, and we expect MPORAM to improve the single-period solution in more balanced cases.
author2 Salmeron, Javier
author_facet Salmeron, Javier
Persons, Jay.
author Persons, Jay.
spellingShingle Persons, Jay.
The United States Army's multi-period optimal readiness allocation model
author_sort Persons, Jay.
title The United States Army's multi-period optimal readiness allocation model
title_short The United States Army's multi-period optimal readiness allocation model
title_full The United States Army's multi-period optimal readiness allocation model
title_fullStr The United States Army's multi-period optimal readiness allocation model
title_full_unstemmed The United States Army's multi-period optimal readiness allocation model
title_sort united states army's multi-period optimal readiness allocation model
publisher Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5668
work_keys_str_mv AT personsjay theunitedstatesarmysmultiperiodoptimalreadinessallocationmodel
AT personsjay unitedstatesarmysmultiperiodoptimalreadinessallocationmodel
_version_ 1716816147266928640