Design requirements for weaponizing man-portable UAS in support of counter-sniper operations

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. === The sniper is a highly successful tool used by the enemy to create both physical and psychological effects on U.S. and Coalition forces. A single enemy sniper can pin down an entire company-sized element for an extended period of time, resu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Snyder, Derek J.
Other Authors: Buettner, Raymond R.
Published: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5543
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-5543
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-55432015-08-06T16:02:24Z Design requirements for weaponizing man-portable UAS in support of counter-sniper operations Snyder, Derek J. Buettner, Raymond R. Jones, Kevin D. Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Information Sciences Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. The sniper is a highly successful tool used by the enemy to create both physical and psychological effects on U.S. and Coalition forces. A single enemy sniper can pin down an entire company-sized element for an extended period of time, resulting in measurable disruptions in operations. This threat is as old as the rifle itself but has been somewhat shadowed by the proliferation of the Improvised Explosive Device (IED) over the past few years. Nevertheless, many resources are being dedicated to counter-sniper technology to include: permanently mounted radar systems, vehicle mounted systems, and shot detection systems worn by the individual Soldier to identify the point of origin (POO) of the small arms fire and thus the location of the sniper. This location is extremely helpful information, but knowledge of the sniper's location alone will not always be enough to regain freedom of maneuver. If the sniper is free to target, his target is not free to maneuver. This thesis explores the design requirements of weaponizing man-portable UAS at the tactical level in support of counter-sniper operations so that the sniper is not free to operate without risk. These systems are already commonly deployed on the battlefield, and if a scalable weapons system capability can be provided, it will immediately reduce the effectiveness of the adversary snipers. 2012-03-14T17:45:45Z 2012-03-14T17:45:45Z 2011-09 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5543 760096081 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. === The sniper is a highly successful tool used by the enemy to create both physical and psychological effects on U.S. and Coalition forces. A single enemy sniper can pin down an entire company-sized element for an extended period of time, resulting in measurable disruptions in operations. This threat is as old as the rifle itself but has been somewhat shadowed by the proliferation of the Improvised Explosive Device (IED) over the past few years. Nevertheless, many resources are being dedicated to counter-sniper technology to include: permanently mounted radar systems, vehicle mounted systems, and shot detection systems worn by the individual Soldier to identify the point of origin (POO) of the small arms fire and thus the location of the sniper. This location is extremely helpful information, but knowledge of the sniper's location alone will not always be enough to regain freedom of maneuver. If the sniper is free to target, his target is not free to maneuver. This thesis explores the design requirements of weaponizing man-portable UAS at the tactical level in support of counter-sniper operations so that the sniper is not free to operate without risk. These systems are already commonly deployed on the battlefield, and if a scalable weapons system capability can be provided, it will immediately reduce the effectiveness of the adversary snipers.
author2 Buettner, Raymond R.
author_facet Buettner, Raymond R.
Snyder, Derek J.
author Snyder, Derek J.
spellingShingle Snyder, Derek J.
Design requirements for weaponizing man-portable UAS in support of counter-sniper operations
author_sort Snyder, Derek J.
title Design requirements for weaponizing man-portable UAS in support of counter-sniper operations
title_short Design requirements for weaponizing man-portable UAS in support of counter-sniper operations
title_full Design requirements for weaponizing man-portable UAS in support of counter-sniper operations
title_fullStr Design requirements for weaponizing man-portable UAS in support of counter-sniper operations
title_full_unstemmed Design requirements for weaponizing man-portable UAS in support of counter-sniper operations
title_sort design requirements for weaponizing man-portable uas in support of counter-sniper operations
publisher Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5543
work_keys_str_mv AT snyderderekj designrequirementsforweaponizingmanportableuasinsupportofcountersniperoperations
_version_ 1716816115892486144