USN manpower determination decision making: a case study using imprint pro to validate the LCS core crew manning solution

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === This thesis was a case study to validate the use of IMPRINT Pro Forces model simulations and FAST model predictions for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) manpower requirements. Input data were derived from data cards collected by the Center for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hollins, Renaldo N., Leszczynski, Kelly M.
Other Authors: Shattuck, Nita Lewis
Published: Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/44582
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-44582
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-445822015-05-06T03:58:59Z USN manpower determination decision making: a case study using imprint pro to validate the LCS core crew manning solution Hollins, Renaldo N. Leszczynski, Kelly M. Shattuck, Nita Lewis Ridley-Blassingame, Simonia Graduate School of Business & Public Policy (GSBPP) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited This thesis was a case study to validate the use of IMPRINT Pro Forces model simulations and FAST model predictions for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) manpower requirements. Input data were derived from data cards collected by the Center for Naval Analysis during an underway with LCS 1 Freedom in Fall 2013 and from information shared by the LCS Program Office, San Diego. A survey was administered to the current crewmembers of the USS Independence (LCS 2) to assess the crew’s perception of the adequacy of current manning concepts and to further validate the IMPRINT and FAST model outputs. Using IMPRINT Pro Forces SOFtware, three different LCS core crew sizes were modeled to assess how each was able to handle day-to-day operations, maintenance, and emergencies during a (notional) operational underway. As crew sizes are reduced, individual performance becomes increasingly important. Multiple watch schedules were modeled using the FAST SOFtware tool, which uses the SAFTE model to predict individual cognitive effectiveness levels using a simulated work and sleep schedules. Using the IMPRINT Pro Forces modeling tool, this study found measurable and significant differences in performance among the three core crew sizes as assessed by ANOVA and Tukey tests. The FAST results showed conclusively that individual performance is significantly affected by the watch rotation a sailor stands. Although this thesis focused on the crew of the LCS, the modeling approach and analytical process can be expanded and applied to a wide range of ships and departments. 2015-02-18T00:17:43Z 2015-02-18T00:17:43Z 2014-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/44582 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === This thesis was a case study to validate the use of IMPRINT Pro Forces model simulations and FAST model predictions for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) manpower requirements. Input data were derived from data cards collected by the Center for Naval Analysis during an underway with LCS 1 Freedom in Fall 2013 and from information shared by the LCS Program Office, San Diego. A survey was administered to the current crewmembers of the USS Independence (LCS 2) to assess the crew’s perception of the adequacy of current manning concepts and to further validate the IMPRINT and FAST model outputs. Using IMPRINT Pro Forces SOFtware, three different LCS core crew sizes were modeled to assess how each was able to handle day-to-day operations, maintenance, and emergencies during a (notional) operational underway. As crew sizes are reduced, individual performance becomes increasingly important. Multiple watch schedules were modeled using the FAST SOFtware tool, which uses the SAFTE model to predict individual cognitive effectiveness levels using a simulated work and sleep schedules. Using the IMPRINT Pro Forces modeling tool, this study found measurable and significant differences in performance among the three core crew sizes as assessed by ANOVA and Tukey tests. The FAST results showed conclusively that individual performance is significantly affected by the watch rotation a sailor stands. Although this thesis focused on the crew of the LCS, the modeling approach and analytical process can be expanded and applied to a wide range of ships and departments.
author2 Shattuck, Nita Lewis
author_facet Shattuck, Nita Lewis
Hollins, Renaldo N.
Leszczynski, Kelly M.
author Hollins, Renaldo N.
Leszczynski, Kelly M.
spellingShingle Hollins, Renaldo N.
Leszczynski, Kelly M.
USN manpower determination decision making: a case study using imprint pro to validate the LCS core crew manning solution
author_sort Hollins, Renaldo N.
title USN manpower determination decision making: a case study using imprint pro to validate the LCS core crew manning solution
title_short USN manpower determination decision making: a case study using imprint pro to validate the LCS core crew manning solution
title_full USN manpower determination decision making: a case study using imprint pro to validate the LCS core crew manning solution
title_fullStr USN manpower determination decision making: a case study using imprint pro to validate the LCS core crew manning solution
title_full_unstemmed USN manpower determination decision making: a case study using imprint pro to validate the LCS core crew manning solution
title_sort usn manpower determination decision making: a case study using imprint pro to validate the lcs core crew manning solution
publisher Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/44582
work_keys_str_mv AT hollinsrenaldon usnmanpowerdeterminationdecisionmakingacasestudyusingimprintprotovalidatethelcscorecrewmanningsolution
AT leszczynskikellym usnmanpowerdeterminationdecisionmakingacasestudyusingimprintprotovalidatethelcscorecrewmanningsolution
_version_ 1716803390080548864