The Land Warrior Soldier system: a case study for the acquisition of soldier systems
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === This project provides an analysis of the Army's acquisition of the Land Warrior (LW) Soldier System. Its objectives are to document the history of the LW and provide an overview of the program to establish the components of both its d...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
2008
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10945/432 |
id |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-432 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-4322017-05-24T16:06:35Z The Land Warrior Soldier system: a case study for the acquisition of soldier systems Clifton, Nile L. Copeland, Douglas W. Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) Graduate School of Business and Public Policy Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited This project provides an analysis of the Army's acquisition of the Land Warrior (LW) Soldier System. Its objectives are to document the history of the LW and provide an overview of the program to establish the components of both its development and deployment and its associated business and management characteristics. The product is a document that provides an analysis of the actions taken and the obstacles encountered and how the materiel developers, warfighters, user representatives and lawmakers dealt with them. The LW need was approved in 1993. The requirement was to provide improvements for dismounted soldiers in the five specific capability categories of lethality, command and control, mobility, survivability, and sustainment. For a period lasting approximately 15 years, the LW has evolved. Despite this evolution, the Army in FY 2007 terminated it in FY 2007. Regardless, it has laid the foundation for follow-on soldier system initiatives. The LW was unsuccessful initially due to the misalignment of three interrelated and supporting components; 1) technical immaturity, 2) poor user acceptance, and 3) lack of senior leadership support. Successes that are more recent can be attributed to: 1) soldier-driven design, 2) improved technical maturity, and 3) proven employment of the system in combat by warfighters. Outstanding Thesis 2008 2012-03-14T16:58:45Z 2012-03-14T16:58:45Z 2008 Report http://hdl.handle.net/10945/432 ocn317699824 NPS-AM-08-114 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined
in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the
public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States
Code, Section 105, is not copyrighted in the U.S. 1 v. application/pdf Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === This project provides an analysis of the Army's acquisition of the Land Warrior (LW) Soldier System. Its objectives are to document the history of the LW and provide an overview of the program to establish the components of both its development and deployment and its associated business and management characteristics. The product is a document that provides an analysis of the actions taken and the obstacles encountered and how the materiel developers, warfighters, user representatives and lawmakers dealt with them. The LW need was approved in 1993. The requirement was to provide improvements for dismounted soldiers in the five specific capability categories of lethality, command and control, mobility, survivability, and sustainment. For a period lasting approximately 15 years, the LW has evolved. Despite this evolution, the Army in FY 2007 terminated it in FY 2007. Regardless, it has laid the foundation for follow-on soldier system initiatives. The LW was unsuccessful initially due to the misalignment of three interrelated and supporting components; 1) technical immaturity, 2) poor user acceptance, and 3) lack of senior leadership support. Successes that are more recent can be attributed to: 1) soldier-driven design, 2) improved technical maturity, and 3) proven employment of the system in combat by warfighters. === Outstanding Thesis |
author2 |
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) |
author_facet |
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) Clifton, Nile L. Copeland, Douglas W. |
author |
Clifton, Nile L. Copeland, Douglas W. |
spellingShingle |
Clifton, Nile L. Copeland, Douglas W. The Land Warrior Soldier system: a case study for the acquisition of soldier systems |
author_sort |
Clifton, Nile L. |
title |
The Land Warrior Soldier system: a case study for the acquisition of soldier systems |
title_short |
The Land Warrior Soldier system: a case study for the acquisition of soldier systems |
title_full |
The Land Warrior Soldier system: a case study for the acquisition of soldier systems |
title_fullStr |
The Land Warrior Soldier system: a case study for the acquisition of soldier systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Land Warrior Soldier system: a case study for the acquisition of soldier systems |
title_sort |
land warrior soldier system: a case study for the acquisition of soldier systems |
publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/432 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cliftonnilel thelandwarriorsoldiersystemacasestudyfortheacquisitionofsoldiersystems AT copelanddouglasw thelandwarriorsoldiersystemacasestudyfortheacquisitionofsoldiersystems AT cliftonnilel landwarriorsoldiersystemacasestudyfortheacquisitionofsoldiersystems AT copelanddouglasw landwarriorsoldiersystemacasestudyfortheacquisitionofsoldiersystems |
_version_ |
1718452442384826368 |