Economic Darwinism in the defense industry: an analysis of corporate responses
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. === This thesis identifies and assesses the corporate strategies adopted by the top defense companies as a result of the new defense spending environment. The model used throughout the thesis stipulates four corporate strategies: expansion, div...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
2014
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10945/39729 |
id |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-39729 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-397292015-01-06T16:05:50Z Economic Darwinism in the defense industry: an analysis of corporate responses Peck, Thomas R. Doyle, Richard Nevels, Jeff Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) Department of Administrative Sciences Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. This thesis identifies and assesses the corporate strategies adopted by the top defense companies as a result of the new defense spending environment. The model used throughout the thesis stipulates four corporate strategies: expansion, diversification. globalization, and rationalization. The thesis outlines the fundamental elements of each strategy and highlights the significant actions taken by the top defense companies. Finally, the factors that framed the selection of these strategies are examined. The compatibility between current skills and production capabilities with market opportunities was the most influential factor in strategy selection. Because of the lead time resulting from backlogs and aggressive cost cutting, the financial viability of the top defense companies is not at risk. The thesis concludes that each of the strategies was pursued to nearly the same degree and many of the companies are pursuing multiple strategies. 2014-03-26T23:23:01Z 2014-03-26T23:23:01Z 1993-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/39729 en_US This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. === This thesis identifies and assesses the corporate strategies adopted by the top defense companies as a result of the new defense spending environment. The model used throughout the thesis stipulates four corporate strategies: expansion, diversification. globalization, and rationalization. The thesis outlines the fundamental elements of each strategy and highlights the significant actions taken by the top defense companies. Finally, the factors that framed the selection of these strategies are examined. The compatibility between current skills and production capabilities with market opportunities was the most influential factor in strategy selection. Because of the lead time resulting from backlogs and aggressive cost cutting, the financial viability of the top defense companies is not at risk. The thesis concludes that each of the strategies was pursued to nearly the same degree and many of the companies are pursuing multiple strategies. |
author2 |
Doyle, Richard |
author_facet |
Doyle, Richard Peck, Thomas R. |
author |
Peck, Thomas R. |
spellingShingle |
Peck, Thomas R. Economic Darwinism in the defense industry: an analysis of corporate responses |
author_sort |
Peck, Thomas R. |
title |
Economic Darwinism in the defense industry: an analysis of corporate responses |
title_short |
Economic Darwinism in the defense industry: an analysis of corporate responses |
title_full |
Economic Darwinism in the defense industry: an analysis of corporate responses |
title_fullStr |
Economic Darwinism in the defense industry: an analysis of corporate responses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic Darwinism in the defense industry: an analysis of corporate responses |
title_sort |
economic darwinism in the defense industry: an analysis of corporate responses |
publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/39729 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peckthomasr economicdarwinisminthedefenseindustryananalysisofcorporateresponses |
_version_ |
1716727852149243904 |