Leadership development revisited : an assessment of midshipmen learning processes at the United States Naval Academy

This thesis attempts to answer the following research questions: (1) How do midshipmen learn about leadership? (2) How do officer learning processes differ from midshipmen learning processes? The learning literature and the leadership literature identified the following leadership learning processes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kennedy, Robert.
Other Authors: Crawford, Alice
Language:en_US
Published: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32656
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-32656
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-326562014-11-27T16:18:26Z Leadership development revisited : an assessment of midshipmen learning processes at the United States Naval Academy Kennedy, Robert. Crawford, Alice Thomas, Gail F. NA Leadership and Human Resource Development This thesis attempts to answer the following research questions: (1) How do midshipmen learn about leadership? (2) How do officer learning processes differ from midshipmen learning processes? The learning literature and the leadership literature identified the following leadership learning processes: (1) experience, (2) observation, (3) reflection, (4) experimentation, (5) interpersonal interactions, (6) organizational cultural, (7) formal instruction (i.e., conceptualization), and (8) self-direction. To test the research questions, the author conducted 25 focused interviews with Naval Academy midshipmen, Naval Postgraduate School students, and Naval Academy leadership instructors. The interview data was transcribed and analyzed. The data analysis yielded eight general themes related to midshipmen leadership development. The data suggested midshipmen learn leadership from the following sources: experience, observation, reflection, interpersonal interaction, and organizational culture. The interview data further suggested midshipmen do not learn leadership from formal classroom instruction; however, the officer interview data supported conceptualization (i.e., theoretical instruction) as an important leadership learning process. The officer interview data suggested that graduate students and leadership instructors use an integrated (i.e., systems) approach to learn leadership. 2013-05-06T18:43:42Z 2013-05-06T18:43:42Z 1998-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32656 en_US This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
description This thesis attempts to answer the following research questions: (1) How do midshipmen learn about leadership? (2) How do officer learning processes differ from midshipmen learning processes? The learning literature and the leadership literature identified the following leadership learning processes: (1) experience, (2) observation, (3) reflection, (4) experimentation, (5) interpersonal interactions, (6) organizational cultural, (7) formal instruction (i.e., conceptualization), and (8) self-direction. To test the research questions, the author conducted 25 focused interviews with Naval Academy midshipmen, Naval Postgraduate School students, and Naval Academy leadership instructors. The interview data was transcribed and analyzed. The data analysis yielded eight general themes related to midshipmen leadership development. The data suggested midshipmen learn leadership from the following sources: experience, observation, reflection, interpersonal interaction, and organizational culture. The interview data further suggested midshipmen do not learn leadership from formal classroom instruction; however, the officer interview data supported conceptualization (i.e., theoretical instruction) as an important leadership learning process. The officer interview data suggested that graduate students and leadership instructors use an integrated (i.e., systems) approach to learn leadership.
author2 Crawford, Alice
author_facet Crawford, Alice
Kennedy, Robert.
author Kennedy, Robert.
spellingShingle Kennedy, Robert.
Leadership development revisited : an assessment of midshipmen learning processes at the United States Naval Academy
author_sort Kennedy, Robert.
title Leadership development revisited : an assessment of midshipmen learning processes at the United States Naval Academy
title_short Leadership development revisited : an assessment of midshipmen learning processes at the United States Naval Academy
title_full Leadership development revisited : an assessment of midshipmen learning processes at the United States Naval Academy
title_fullStr Leadership development revisited : an assessment of midshipmen learning processes at the United States Naval Academy
title_full_unstemmed Leadership development revisited : an assessment of midshipmen learning processes at the United States Naval Academy
title_sort leadership development revisited : an assessment of midshipmen learning processes at the united states naval academy
publisher Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32656
work_keys_str_mv AT kennedyrobert leadershipdevelopmentrevisitedanassessmentofmidshipmenlearningprocessesattheunitedstatesnavalacademy
_version_ 1716725358526464000