Automatic sensitivity analysis for an Army modernization optimization model

This is an extremely turbulent period for the post-cold-war Army. Even though the tempo of operations has increased dramatically worldwide, a peace dividend is demanded, consequently placing substantial constraints on the Army's capital budgeting process. In spite of this, the senior leadership...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnson, John Peter
Other Authors: Rosenthal, Richard E.
Language:en_US
Published: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/31448
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-31448
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-314482014-11-27T16:18:04Z Automatic sensitivity analysis for an Army modernization optimization model Johnson, John Peter Rosenthal, Richard E. Operations Research This is an extremely turbulent period for the post-cold-war Army. Even though the tempo of operations has increased dramatically worldwide, a peace dividend is demanded, consequently placing substantial constraints on the Army's capital budgeting process. In spite of this, the senior leadership is determined to maintain a first-rate force capable of meeting the challenges of the future. Currently, the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations and Plans (DCSOPS), United States Army, is reviewing a decision tool known as the Research, Development and Acquisition Alternative Analyzer (RDA3) to support the development of the Army Modernization Plan (AMP). RDA3 is a mixed integer optimization model formulated in the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) by Donahue (1992). It prioritizes modernization actions and optimally allocates scarce research and development funds. The goal of this thesis work is to enhance RDA3 to provide the user with a more robust decision tool capable of providing a complete analysis of the entire decision space. Specifically, this study focuses on the unfunded investment projects in the RDA3 solution, which are collectively called the losers list. The idea is to automatically provide explanatory information as to why each project on the losers list is unfunded. This study uses techniques developed by Chinneck (1993) for identifying infeasibilities in linear programming models. Chinneck's techniques are specialized for the RDA3 context and extended to integer programming. Additionally, the idea of controlling the amount of change from one model run to another, known as persistence, is applied to RDA3. 2013-04-29T22:50:42Z 2013-04-29T22:50:42Z 1995-06 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/31448 en_US This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
description This is an extremely turbulent period for the post-cold-war Army. Even though the tempo of operations has increased dramatically worldwide, a peace dividend is demanded, consequently placing substantial constraints on the Army's capital budgeting process. In spite of this, the senior leadership is determined to maintain a first-rate force capable of meeting the challenges of the future. Currently, the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations and Plans (DCSOPS), United States Army, is reviewing a decision tool known as the Research, Development and Acquisition Alternative Analyzer (RDA3) to support the development of the Army Modernization Plan (AMP). RDA3 is a mixed integer optimization model formulated in the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) by Donahue (1992). It prioritizes modernization actions and optimally allocates scarce research and development funds. The goal of this thesis work is to enhance RDA3 to provide the user with a more robust decision tool capable of providing a complete analysis of the entire decision space. Specifically, this study focuses on the unfunded investment projects in the RDA3 solution, which are collectively called the losers list. The idea is to automatically provide explanatory information as to why each project on the losers list is unfunded. This study uses techniques developed by Chinneck (1993) for identifying infeasibilities in linear programming models. Chinneck's techniques are specialized for the RDA3 context and extended to integer programming. Additionally, the idea of controlling the amount of change from one model run to another, known as persistence, is applied to RDA3.
author2 Rosenthal, Richard E.
author_facet Rosenthal, Richard E.
Johnson, John Peter
author Johnson, John Peter
spellingShingle Johnson, John Peter
Automatic sensitivity analysis for an Army modernization optimization model
author_sort Johnson, John Peter
title Automatic sensitivity analysis for an Army modernization optimization model
title_short Automatic sensitivity analysis for an Army modernization optimization model
title_full Automatic sensitivity analysis for an Army modernization optimization model
title_fullStr Automatic sensitivity analysis for an Army modernization optimization model
title_full_unstemmed Automatic sensitivity analysis for an Army modernization optimization model
title_sort automatic sensitivity analysis for an army modernization optimization model
publisher Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/31448
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonjohnpeter automaticsensitivityanalysisforanarmymodernizationoptimizationmodel
_version_ 1716725196664078336