A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process
Econometricans must choose between many methods for estimating Rho in a first order autoregressive process. This thesis examines the performance of four estimators in a Monte Carlo situation. The methods examined are Durbin-Watson, Beach-MacKinnon, Theil-Nagar and Prais-Winsten. The autocorrelation...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2012
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10945/21718 |
id |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-21718 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-217182014-11-27T16:14:28Z A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process Horn, Joseph A. Boger, Dan C. NA NA NA NA Econometricans must choose between many methods for estimating Rho in a first order autoregressive process. This thesis examines the performance of four estimators in a Monte Carlo situation. The methods examined are Durbin-Watson, Beach-MacKinnon, Theil-Nagar and Prais-Winsten. The autocorrelation coefficient, Rho, was varied from .2 to .9 and each method provided estimates of Rho and beta for 1000 replications. The results presented here are similar to those found in previous comparisons. Specifically, Ordinary Least Squares was found to be an efficient estimator of beta when autocorrelation is present only to a slight degree. Of the four estimators examined, the performance of Theil-Nagar proved superior in estimating both Rho and beta for small values of the correlation coeficient. Beach-MacKinnon, on the hand, while containing a large bias in the estimation of Rho, is the more efficient estimator of beta for large values of Rho 2012-11-27T00:15:40Z 2012-11-27T00:15:40Z 1986 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/21718 ocn641012865 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Econometricans must choose between many methods for estimating Rho in a first order autoregressive process. This thesis examines the performance of four estimators in a Monte Carlo situation. The methods examined are Durbin-Watson, Beach-MacKinnon, Theil-Nagar and Prais-Winsten. The autocorrelation coefficient, Rho, was varied from .2 to .9 and each method provided estimates of Rho and beta for 1000 replications. The results presented here are similar to those found in previous comparisons. Specifically, Ordinary Least Squares was found to be an efficient estimator of beta when autocorrelation is present only to a slight degree. Of the four estimators examined, the performance of Theil-Nagar proved superior in estimating both Rho and beta for small values of the correlation coeficient. Beach-MacKinnon, on the hand, while containing a large bias in the estimation of Rho, is the more efficient estimator of beta for large values of Rho |
author2 |
Boger, Dan C. |
author_facet |
Boger, Dan C. Horn, Joseph A. |
author |
Horn, Joseph A. |
spellingShingle |
Horn, Joseph A. A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process |
author_sort |
Horn, Joseph A. |
title |
A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process |
title_short |
A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process |
title_full |
A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process |
title_sort |
comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/21718 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hornjosepha acomparisonoffourestimatorsofafirstorderautoregressiveprocess AT hornjosepha comparisonoffourestimatorsofafirstorderautoregressiveprocess |
_version_ |
1716723860099825664 |