A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process

Econometricans must choose between many methods for estimating Rho in a first order autoregressive process. This thesis examines the performance of four estimators in a Monte Carlo situation. The methods examined are Durbin-Watson, Beach-MacKinnon, Theil-Nagar and Prais-Winsten. The autocorrelation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Horn, Joseph A.
Other Authors: Boger, Dan C.
Language:en_US
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/21718
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-21718
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-217182014-11-27T16:14:28Z A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process Horn, Joseph A. Boger, Dan C. NA NA NA NA Econometricans must choose between many methods for estimating Rho in a first order autoregressive process. This thesis examines the performance of four estimators in a Monte Carlo situation. The methods examined are Durbin-Watson, Beach-MacKinnon, Theil-Nagar and Prais-Winsten. The autocorrelation coefficient, Rho, was varied from .2 to .9 and each method provided estimates of Rho and beta for 1000 replications. The results presented here are similar to those found in previous comparisons. Specifically, Ordinary Least Squares was found to be an efficient estimator of beta when autocorrelation is present only to a slight degree. Of the four estimators examined, the performance of Theil-Nagar proved superior in estimating both Rho and beta for small values of the correlation coeficient. Beach-MacKinnon, on the hand, while containing a large bias in the estimation of Rho, is the more efficient estimator of beta for large values of Rho 2012-11-27T00:15:40Z 2012-11-27T00:15:40Z 1986 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/21718 ocn641012865 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
description Econometricans must choose between many methods for estimating Rho in a first order autoregressive process. This thesis examines the performance of four estimators in a Monte Carlo situation. The methods examined are Durbin-Watson, Beach-MacKinnon, Theil-Nagar and Prais-Winsten. The autocorrelation coefficient, Rho, was varied from .2 to .9 and each method provided estimates of Rho and beta for 1000 replications. The results presented here are similar to those found in previous comparisons. Specifically, Ordinary Least Squares was found to be an efficient estimator of beta when autocorrelation is present only to a slight degree. Of the four estimators examined, the performance of Theil-Nagar proved superior in estimating both Rho and beta for small values of the correlation coeficient. Beach-MacKinnon, on the hand, while containing a large bias in the estimation of Rho, is the more efficient estimator of beta for large values of Rho
author2 Boger, Dan C.
author_facet Boger, Dan C.
Horn, Joseph A.
author Horn, Joseph A.
spellingShingle Horn, Joseph A.
A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process
author_sort Horn, Joseph A.
title A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process
title_short A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process
title_full A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process
title_fullStr A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process
title_sort comparison of four estimators of a first order autoregressive process
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/21718
work_keys_str_mv AT hornjosepha acomparisonoffourestimatorsofafirstorderautoregressiveprocess
AT hornjosepha comparisonoffourestimatorsofafirstorderautoregressiveprocess
_version_ 1716723860099825664