Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning

Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited === This study identifies factors affecting the performance of commercial-off-the-shelf speech recognition software (SRS) when used for ship control purposes. After a review of research in the feasibility and acceptability of SRS-based ship cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kuffel, Robert F.
Other Authors: Gottfried, Russell
Format: Others
Published: Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School Marc
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1662
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-1662
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-16622017-05-24T16:07:16Z Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning Kuffel, Robert F. Gottfried, Russell Fargues, Monique P. Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Department of Information Sciences Automatic speech recognition Computer software Training Ship handling Speech recognition Voice recognition Ship maneuvers Standard commands Ship handling Commercial-off-the-shelf software Voice activated control system Manpower reducing technology Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited This study identifies factors affecting the performance of commercial-off-the-shelf speech recognition software (SRS) when used for ship control purposes. After a review of research in the feasibility and acceptability of SRS-based ship control, the paper examines the effects of: "A restricted vocabulary versus a large vocabulary," Low experience level conning officers versus high experience level conning officers, "Male versus female voices," Pre-test training on specific words versus no pre-test training. Controlled experimentation finds that: "The experience level of a conning officer has no significant impact on SRS performance." Female participants experienced more SRS errors than did their male counterparts. However, in this experiment, only a limited number of trials were available to assess a difference. "SRS with restricted vocabulary performs no better than SRS with large vocabularies." Using the software "correct as you go" feature may impact software performance. Following the user profile establishment, individual user training on two specific words reduces error rates significantly. This study concludes that SRS is a viable technology for ship control and merits further testing and evaluation. Lieutenant, United States Navy March 2004 2012-03-14T17:32:36Z 2012-03-14T17:32:36Z 2004-03 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1662 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. xii, 48 p. application/pdf Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Automatic speech recognition
Computer software
Training
Ship handling
Speech recognition
Voice recognition
Ship maneuvers
Standard commands
Ship handling
Commercial-off-the-shelf software
Voice activated control system
Manpower reducing technology
spellingShingle Automatic speech recognition
Computer software
Training
Ship handling
Speech recognition
Voice recognition
Ship maneuvers
Standard commands
Ship handling
Commercial-off-the-shelf software
Voice activated control system
Manpower reducing technology
Kuffel, Robert F.
Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning
description Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited === This study identifies factors affecting the performance of commercial-off-the-shelf speech recognition software (SRS) when used for ship control purposes. After a review of research in the feasibility and acceptability of SRS-based ship control, the paper examines the effects of: "A restricted vocabulary versus a large vocabulary," Low experience level conning officers versus high experience level conning officers, "Male versus female voices," Pre-test training on specific words versus no pre-test training. Controlled experimentation finds that: "The experience level of a conning officer has no significant impact on SRS performance." Female participants experienced more SRS errors than did their male counterparts. However, in this experiment, only a limited number of trials were available to assess a difference. "SRS with restricted vocabulary performs no better than SRS with large vocabularies." Using the software "correct as you go" feature may impact software performance. Following the user profile establishment, individual user training on two specific words reduces error rates significantly. This study concludes that SRS is a viable technology for ship control and merits further testing and evaluation. === Lieutenant, United States Navy
author2 Gottfried, Russell
author_facet Gottfried, Russell
Kuffel, Robert F.
author Kuffel, Robert F.
author_sort Kuffel, Robert F.
title Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning
title_short Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning
title_full Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning
title_fullStr Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning
title_full_unstemmed Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning
title_sort speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning
publisher Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate Marc
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1662
work_keys_str_mv AT kuffelrobertf speechrecognitionsoftwareanalternativetoreduceshipcontrolmanning
_version_ 1718452705654996992