Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning
Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited === This study identifies factors affecting the performance of commercial-off-the-shelf speech recognition software (SRS) when used for ship control purposes. After a review of research in the feasibility and acceptability of SRS-based ship cont...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School
Marc
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1662 |
id |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-1662 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-16622017-05-24T16:07:16Z Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning Kuffel, Robert F. Gottfried, Russell Fargues, Monique P. Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Department of Information Sciences Automatic speech recognition Computer software Training Ship handling Speech recognition Voice recognition Ship maneuvers Standard commands Ship handling Commercial-off-the-shelf software Voice activated control system Manpower reducing technology Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited This study identifies factors affecting the performance of commercial-off-the-shelf speech recognition software (SRS) when used for ship control purposes. After a review of research in the feasibility and acceptability of SRS-based ship control, the paper examines the effects of: "A restricted vocabulary versus a large vocabulary," Low experience level conning officers versus high experience level conning officers, "Male versus female voices," Pre-test training on specific words versus no pre-test training. Controlled experimentation finds that: "The experience level of a conning officer has no significant impact on SRS performance." Female participants experienced more SRS errors than did their male counterparts. However, in this experiment, only a limited number of trials were available to assess a difference. "SRS with restricted vocabulary performs no better than SRS with large vocabularies." Using the software "correct as you go" feature may impact software performance. Following the user profile establishment, individual user training on two specific words reduces error rates significantly. This study concludes that SRS is a viable technology for ship control and merits further testing and evaluation. Lieutenant, United States Navy March 2004 2012-03-14T17:32:36Z 2012-03-14T17:32:36Z 2004-03 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1662 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted. xii, 48 p. application/pdf Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Automatic speech recognition Computer software Training Ship handling Speech recognition Voice recognition Ship maneuvers Standard commands Ship handling Commercial-off-the-shelf software Voice activated control system Manpower reducing technology |
spellingShingle |
Automatic speech recognition Computer software Training Ship handling Speech recognition Voice recognition Ship maneuvers Standard commands Ship handling Commercial-off-the-shelf software Voice activated control system Manpower reducing technology Kuffel, Robert F. Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning |
description |
Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited === This study identifies factors affecting the performance of commercial-off-the-shelf speech recognition software (SRS) when used for ship control purposes. After a review of research in the feasibility and acceptability of SRS-based ship control, the paper examines the effects of: "A restricted vocabulary versus a large vocabulary," Low experience level conning officers versus high experience level conning officers, "Male versus female voices," Pre-test training on specific words versus no pre-test training. Controlled experimentation finds that: "The experience level of a conning officer has no significant impact on SRS performance." Female participants experienced more SRS errors than did their male counterparts. However, in this experiment, only a limited number of trials were available to assess a difference. "SRS with restricted vocabulary performs no better than SRS with large vocabularies." Using the software "correct as you go" feature may impact software performance. Following the user profile establishment, individual user training on two specific words reduces error rates significantly. This study concludes that SRS is a viable technology for ship control and merits further testing and evaluation. === Lieutenant, United States Navy |
author2 |
Gottfried, Russell |
author_facet |
Gottfried, Russell Kuffel, Robert F. |
author |
Kuffel, Robert F. |
author_sort |
Kuffel, Robert F. |
title |
Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning |
title_short |
Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning |
title_full |
Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning |
title_fullStr |
Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning |
title_sort |
speech recognition software: an alternative to reduce ship control manning |
publisher |
Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School |
publishDate |
Marc |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1662 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kuffelrobertf speechrecognitionsoftwareanalternativetoreduceshipcontrolmanning |
_version_ |
1718452705654996992 |