Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === Current Army models and simulations provide limited representation of the actions and behaviors of the individual combatant (Soldier, Sailor, Marine, or Airman). As the Army transforms into the Future Force, more emphasis is being placed on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Streater, D. Brent
Other Authors: Paulo, Eugene P.
Format: Others
Published: Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1508
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-1508
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-15082017-05-24T16:07:07Z Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire Streater, D. Brent Paulo, Eugene P. Lucas, Thomas W. Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Operations Research Combat Computer simulation Human behavior Physiological aspects Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Current Army models and simulations provide limited representation of the actions and behaviors of the individual combatant (Soldier, Sailor, Marine, or Airman). As the Army transforms into the Future Force, more emphasis is being placed on modeling the actions and behaviors of the individual combatant. The Training and Doctrine Command Analysis Center - Monterey has initiated the Individual Combatant Research Project. One research area is modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire, which is the focus of this thesis. From a study of both historical examples and current U.S. Army doctrine, we derived the input factors and responses. We selected the most significant input factors and derived a general model to represent this phenomenon. From the general model we derived a specific model that we implemented as a behavior rule using the Combined Arms Analysis Tool for the 21st Century, CXXI. In order to determine the effectiveness of the model, we used the face validation method. Our data analysis consisted of a twosample t-test, a Mann-Whitney test, and a two-way analysis of variance. From our analysis we concluded that implementation of our model in CXXI was an improvement that made CXXI more realistic and functional. Captain, United States Army 2012-03-14T17:32:07Z 2012-03-14T17:32:07Z 2004-06 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1508 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. xviii, 49 p. : col. maps ; application/pdf Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Combat
Computer simulation
Human behavior
Physiological aspects
spellingShingle Combat
Computer simulation
Human behavior
Physiological aspects
Streater, D. Brent
Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire
description Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === Current Army models and simulations provide limited representation of the actions and behaviors of the individual combatant (Soldier, Sailor, Marine, or Airman). As the Army transforms into the Future Force, more emphasis is being placed on modeling the actions and behaviors of the individual combatant. The Training and Doctrine Command Analysis Center - Monterey has initiated the Individual Combatant Research Project. One research area is modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire, which is the focus of this thesis. From a study of both historical examples and current U.S. Army doctrine, we derived the input factors and responses. We selected the most significant input factors and derived a general model to represent this phenomenon. From the general model we derived a specific model that we implemented as a behavior rule using the Combined Arms Analysis Tool for the 21st Century, CXXI. In order to determine the effectiveness of the model, we used the face validation method. Our data analysis consisted of a twosample t-test, a Mann-Whitney test, and a two-way analysis of variance. From our analysis we concluded that implementation of our model in CXXI was an improvement that made CXXI more realistic and functional. === Captain, United States Army
author2 Paulo, Eugene P.
author_facet Paulo, Eugene P.
Streater, D. Brent
author Streater, D. Brent
author_sort Streater, D. Brent
title Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire
title_short Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire
title_full Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire
title_fullStr Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire
title_full_unstemmed Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire
title_sort modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire
publisher Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1508
work_keys_str_mv AT streaterdbrent modelinghowindividualentitiesreacttoindirectfire
_version_ 1718452640427278336