Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === Current Army models and simulations provide limited representation of the actions and behaviors of the individual combatant (Soldier, Sailor, Marine, or Airman). As the Army transforms into the Future Force, more emphasis is being placed on...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1508 |
id |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-1508 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-15082017-05-24T16:07:07Z Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire Streater, D. Brent Paulo, Eugene P. Lucas, Thomas W. Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.). Operations Research Combat Computer simulation Human behavior Physiological aspects Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Current Army models and simulations provide limited representation of the actions and behaviors of the individual combatant (Soldier, Sailor, Marine, or Airman). As the Army transforms into the Future Force, more emphasis is being placed on modeling the actions and behaviors of the individual combatant. The Training and Doctrine Command Analysis Center - Monterey has initiated the Individual Combatant Research Project. One research area is modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire, which is the focus of this thesis. From a study of both historical examples and current U.S. Army doctrine, we derived the input factors and responses. We selected the most significant input factors and derived a general model to represent this phenomenon. From the general model we derived a specific model that we implemented as a behavior rule using the Combined Arms Analysis Tool for the 21st Century, CXXI. In order to determine the effectiveness of the model, we used the face validation method. Our data analysis consisted of a twosample t-test, a Mann-Whitney test, and a two-way analysis of variance. From our analysis we concluded that implementation of our model in CXXI was an improvement that made CXXI more realistic and functional. Captain, United States Army 2012-03-14T17:32:07Z 2012-03-14T17:32:07Z 2004-06 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1508 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. xviii, 49 p. : col. maps ; application/pdf Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Combat Computer simulation Human behavior Physiological aspects |
spellingShingle |
Combat Computer simulation Human behavior Physiological aspects Streater, D. Brent Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire |
description |
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === Current Army models and simulations provide limited representation of the actions and behaviors of the individual combatant (Soldier, Sailor, Marine, or Airman). As the Army transforms into the Future Force, more emphasis is being placed on modeling the actions and behaviors of the individual combatant. The Training and Doctrine Command Analysis Center - Monterey has initiated the Individual Combatant Research Project. One research area is modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire, which is the focus of this thesis. From a study of both historical examples and current U.S. Army doctrine, we derived the input factors and responses. We selected the most significant input factors and derived a general model to represent this phenomenon. From the general model we derived a specific model that we implemented as a behavior rule using the Combined Arms Analysis Tool for the 21st Century, CXXI. In order to determine the effectiveness of the model, we used the face validation method. Our data analysis consisted of a twosample t-test, a Mann-Whitney test, and a two-way analysis of variance. From our analysis we concluded that implementation of our model in CXXI was an improvement that made CXXI more realistic and functional. === Captain, United States Army |
author2 |
Paulo, Eugene P. |
author_facet |
Paulo, Eugene P. Streater, D. Brent |
author |
Streater, D. Brent |
author_sort |
Streater, D. Brent |
title |
Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire |
title_short |
Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire |
title_full |
Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire |
title_fullStr |
Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire |
title_sort |
modeling how individual entities react to indirect fire |
publisher |
Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1508 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT streaterdbrent modelinghowindividualentitiesreacttoindirectfire |
_version_ |
1718452640427278336 |