Super 301 and the Trade Deficit
The thesis considers the issues associated with one of the amendments of section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 - the so-called Super 301. It was included in the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988. This measure was passed to solve problems with the U.S. bilateral trade deficits, which were...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
2012
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10945/13563 |
id |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-13563 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-135632014-11-27T16:10:26Z Super 301 and the Trade Deficit Svilenov, Roussin M. Roger D. Evered. Looney, Robert E. The thesis considers the issues associated with one of the amendments of section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 - the so-called Super 301. It was included in the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988. This measure was passed to solve problems with the U.S. bilateral trade deficits, which were considered to be a consequence of trade barriers to U.S. exports in foreign countries Under Super 301 the United States presses foreign countries to eliminate unfair trade practices under threat of unilateral retaliation. The paper explores the history of Super 301, the cases of its application, the extent to which it achieved its purpose, and its implications for the international multilateral trade agreements. The paper concludes that the Super 301 has failed to eliminate the problem of the U.S. bilateral trade deficit with Japan, and has inspired resentment on the part of U.S. trading partners to negotiate under threat of punishment. 2012-09-07T15:34:48Z 2012-09-07T15:34:48Z 1999-06 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/13563 en_US Approved for public release, distribution unlimited. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
The thesis considers the issues associated with one of the amendments of section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 - the so-called Super 301. It was included in the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988. This measure was passed to solve problems with the U.S. bilateral trade deficits, which were considered to be a consequence of trade barriers to U.S. exports in foreign countries Under Super 301 the United States presses foreign countries to eliminate unfair trade practices under threat of unilateral retaliation. The paper explores the history of Super 301, the cases of its application, the extent to which it achieved its purpose, and its implications for the international multilateral trade agreements. The paper concludes that the Super 301 has failed to eliminate the problem of the U.S. bilateral trade deficit with Japan, and has inspired resentment on the part of U.S. trading partners to negotiate under threat of punishment. |
author2 |
Roger D. Evered. |
author_facet |
Roger D. Evered. Svilenov, Roussin M. |
author |
Svilenov, Roussin M. |
spellingShingle |
Svilenov, Roussin M. Super 301 and the Trade Deficit |
author_sort |
Svilenov, Roussin M. |
title |
Super 301 and the Trade Deficit |
title_short |
Super 301 and the Trade Deficit |
title_full |
Super 301 and the Trade Deficit |
title_fullStr |
Super 301 and the Trade Deficit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Super 301 and the Trade Deficit |
title_sort |
super 301 and the trade deficit |
publisher |
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/13563 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT svilenovroussinm super301andthetradedeficit |
_version_ |
1716722083719806976 |